Resident operative time as an independent predictor of early post-operative cataract surgery outcomes and supervising attending surgeon impact: a retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: The authors sought to determine if resident operative time in cataract extraction and intraocular lens insertion (CE/IOL) affects early visual outcomes and post-operative recovery. They further sought to investigate if attending surgeons can reduce resident operative time. METHODS: This retrospective, chart-review, case series at single Veterans Affairs Hospital (VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System) studied resident cataract surgeries between March 1, 2018 and March 31, 2020. Following power analysis, 420 eyes of 400 patients from all resident cataract surgeries were included. Eyes with attending as primary surgeon, laser-assisted cataract surgery, or concurrent secondary procedures were excluded. Linear mixed effect models were used to study the association between operative time and visual outcomes while adjusting for covariates including cumulative dissipated energy, preoperative factors, and intraoperative complications. RESULTS: Longer operative time was statistically associated with worse post-operative-day 1 (POD1) pinhole visual acuity (PH-VA) adjusting for cumulative dissipated energy and other operative factors (p = 0.049). Although resident physicians were the primary surgeons, the operative times were different between the ten supervising attending surgeons in the study (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that increased resident operative time is a significant, independent risk factor for decreased POD1 PH-VA. Increased resident operative time is not associated with worsened long term visual outcomes. Attending surgeons may be able to reduce resident operative time, which is associated with improved early visual outcomes.

Evaluation of Two-Dimensional (2D) versus Three-Dimensional (3D) Video Tutorials in Cataract Surgery for New Trainees.

Purpose Microscopic ophthalmic surgery requires an understanding of three-dimensional (3D) spaces within the eye. Recently, there has been an increase in 3D video training tools in health care. Studies have evaluated the efficacy of 3D tutorials in general surgery, but little has been published within ophthalmology. We present a randomized study evaluating differences in surgically naïve trainees after watching either a 2D or 3D phacoemulsification tutorial. Design This was a double-blind, randomized study. A group of third and fourth year medical students at our institution were randomized with stratified randomization based on prior surgical courses to control for differences in baseline surgical skill. The two study arms were watching 2D or 3D instructional videos on phacoemulsification (Richard Mackool). Methods Participants received a preliminary survey and participated in an hour-long microscopic surgery session. During the session, participants performed tasks evaluating baseline microscopic spatial awareness and surgical skill. The students were then instructed to watch either a 2D or 3D video on phacoemulsification based on their randomized study arm. During the postintervention session, participants performed the biplanar incision and capsulorhexis steps of cataract surgery discussed in the video on model eyes. Students were evaluated on speed and overall capsulorhexis quality. Results Thirty-one students qualified for the study and completed the microscopic surgery session. Students in both groups had similar baseline speed and quality of preintervention microscopic tasks ( p > 0.05 for all tasks). Postintervention, students randomized to the 3D video performed significantly faster than the 2D group for biplanar incision (11.1 ± 5.5 s vs. 20.7 ± 10.5 s, p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences found between the groups in capsulorhexis timing ( p = 0.12) or quality score ( p = 0.60). Conclusions 3D video surgical training tutorials may improve speed of certain steps of cataract surgery for surgically naïve ophthalmology trainees. Given the limited sample size of this study, further investigation of their effectiveness is warranted.

Risk of Infectious Endophthalmitis From a Resident-Performed Intravitreal Injection.

PURPOSE: This work assesses the safety of resident-performed intravitreal injections by comparing the incidence of postinjection endophthalmitis associated with residents vs surgical retina attendings. METHODS: In this retrospective noninferiority cohort study, the Current Procedural Technology code for an intravitreal injection was used to identify patients from July 1, 2015, to October 31, 2018, at a single-center Veterans Affairs hospital where patients receive intravitreal injections from attending vitreoretinal surgeons and residents. The medical record for each injection was reviewed for the training level of the proceduralist, indication, medication, and laterality. The main outcome was the incidence of postinjection endophthalmitis occurring within 30 days of an intravitreal injection, which was confirmed by at least 2 medical-record reviewers. RESULTS: In this cohort of 593 patients, most were male (97.0%), and the average age was 70.3 years (±10.8 years). Of the 6934 injections given, 3877 (55.9%) were performed by residents and 3057 (44.1%) by attendings. Of the 5 cases of endophthalmitis identified, 3 were associated with a resident-performed injection in his or her fourth year of postgraduate training. The difference (0.012%; 95% CI, -0.168% to 0.169%) in the incidence of postinjection endophthalmitis between residents (0.077%) and attendings (0.065%) did not cross the predetermined noninferiority limit (0.200%). CONCLUSIONS: At our teaching clinic, resident-performed injections were not associated with an elevated risk of endophthalmitis when compared with attending-performed injections. Under varying levels of supervision, residents appeared to demonstrate appropriate sterile injection technique.

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer: Cutaneous lesions & atypical fibroids.

OBJECTIVE: To report a diagnosis of hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) syndrome following initial presentation with multiple cutaneous lesions. DESIGN: Case report. DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: N/A. SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: 27-year-old nulligravid woman who presented with multiple red-brown lesions on her skin found to have cutaneous and uterine leiomyoma. INTERVENTIONS: Biopsy of cutaneous lesions and fertility sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESS: Histological assessment of uterine leiomyoma. RESULTSS: Pathologic examination of uterine leiomyoma revealed diffuse atypia and fumarate hydratase loss phenotype concerning for genetic syndrome. Follow-up DNA sequencing via Sanger sequencing confirmed a pathogenetic R2333H mutation consistent with HLRCC. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration of HLRCC on differential diagnosis when patients present with cutaneous nodules and atypical or early onset uterine leiomyoma provides opportunity for early surveillance, family member testing, and more thoughtful surgical planning. PRECIS: 27-year-old woman with multiple cutaneous lesions is found to have uterine leiomyomas and undergoes robotic myomectomy. Genetic testing of uterine leiomyomas reveals mutation in fumarate hydratase, etiologic in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC).