RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Surgeons and perioperative staff experience high rates of burnout manifesting as exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of achievement. Consequences include increases in errors and adverse patient events. Little data exist regarding the effectiveness of multidisciplinary peer support systems in combatting burnout. We sought to improve staff morale through establishment of a formally trained, multidisciplinary peer support team. METHODS: Selfselected surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses were formally trained as Peer Responders as part of an institutional peer support program. All perioperative staff at our pediatric surgery center (n = 120) were surveyed before initiation of the program and then 1-mo and 12-mo after initiation. Primary outcomes were unit morale, unit support, and peer approachability. Kruskal-Wallis tests and Chi-squared tests were used for comparison of primary outcomes among surveys and by position with an alpha value of 0.05 set for significance. Institutional review board approval was waived. RESULTS: The survey response rates were 57.5%, 32.5%, and 37.5% chronologically. After 1 year, there were statistically significant increases in unit support (P < 0.01) and peer approachability (P < 0.001), and a nonstatistically significant increase in unit morale (P = 0.22). On subgroup analysis by staff role, surgeons were least likely to utilize peer support. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary peer support team is an effective and easily reproducible means of building a culture of support and improving morale among perioperative staff. Surgeons were least likely to seek interprofessional peer support. Consequently, surgeon-specific strategies may be necessary. Further investigations are ongoing regarding secondary effects on staff burnout rates, patient safety, and quality of care.
