[Efficiency of electrocardiogram monitor for positioning the catheter tip in the central catheter placement via lower extremity veins in neonates: a randomized controlled study]. / å¿ƒç”µç›‘æŠ¤ä»ªåœ¨æ–°ç”Ÿå„¿ç»ä¸‹è‚¢é™è„‰ç½®å ¥ä¸­å¿ƒé™è„‰å¯¼ç®¡ä¸­å®šä½æ•ˆæžœçš„éšæœºå¯¹ç §ç ”ç©¶.

OBJECTIVES: To study the efficiency of electrocardiogram (ECG) monitor for positioning the catheter tip in the placement of peripherally inserted central venous catheterization (PICC) via lower extremity veins in neonates. METHODS: A total of 120 neonates who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit from January 2020 to January 2022 and received PICC via lower extremity veins were enrolled and divided into a control group and an observation group using a random number table (n=60 each). The neonates in the control group were given body surface measurement and postoperative chest X-ray localization, and those in the observation group were given body surface measurement, ECG-guided positioning, and postoperative chest X-ray localization. The two groups were compared in terms of general information, one-time success rate of PICC placement, and time spent on PICC placement, and the efficiency of ECG-guided positioning was evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the observation group had a higher one-time success rate of PICC placement (92% vs 75%; P<0.05) and a shorter time spent on PICC placement [(26.5±3.0) min vs (31.8±2.8) min; P<0.05]. ECG-guided positioning had a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 100% in the PICC placement via lower extremity veins in neonates. CONCLUSIONS: ECG monitor helps to determine the position of catheter tip in the PICC placement via lower extremity veins in neonates and can improve the one-time success rate of PICC placement and reduce the time spent on PICC placement, with a good positioning efficiency.

[RCT of Reduction in Catheter-Related Complications by Using Intracavitary Electrocardiogram-Assisted Guidance in Neonatal PICC Placement].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG) guidance on peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) related complications in neonatal patients. METHODS: A total of 210 neonatal patients were included in the study. They were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Sichuan Provincial People's Hosptial between January, 2017 and December, 2019 and had PICC lines were placed in their upper limbs. The patients were randomly assigned to the observation group, which had PICC placement through conventional anatomical landmark guidance combined with IC-ECG guidance ( n=105) or to the control group, which had PICC placement through only conventional anatomical landmark guidance ( n=105) for PICC catheter tip positioning. Patient baseline data and data on subsequent catheter-related complications of the two groups were collected and compared. RESULTS: There were no significant difference between the two groups in sex composition, gestational age, postnatal days on the day of PICC placement, duration of PICC placement, disease profile, and the site of puncture ( P>0.05). The observation group showed a significantly lower overall incidence of catheter-related complications (3.8%), compared to that of the control group (21.9%) ( P<0.05). The observation group showed significantly lower incidence of phlebitis and arrhthmia compared to that of the control group ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION: A combination of anatomical landmark guidance and IC-ECG guidance to assist the placement of PICC decreases catheter-related complications.

[Efficiency of electrocardiogram monitor for positioning the catheter tip in peripherally inserted central catheter placement in neonates].

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficiency of electrocardiogram (ECG) monitor for positioning the catheter tip in the placement of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in neonates. METHODS: A total of 160 neonates who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from January 2015 to December 2017 and underwent the PICC placement via the veins of upper extremity were enrolled. They were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 80 neonates in each group. The neonates in the control group were given body surface measurement and postoperative X-ray localization, while those in the observation group were given body surface measurement, ECG localization, and postoperative X-ray localization. The two groups were compared in terms of general information, one-time success rate of PICC placement, and time spent on PICC placement. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in sex composition, gestational age, age in days at the time of PICC placement, disease type, and site of puncture (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group had a significantly higher one-time success rate of PICC placement (95% vs 79%; P<0.05) and a significantly shorter time spent on PICC placement (P<0.05). Localization under an ECG monitor during PICC placement had a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: During the PICC placement in neonates, the use of ECG monitor to determine the position of catheter tip can improve the one-time success rate of placement and reduce the time spent on placement.