Update on 2-year outcomes of the TOMS™ transobturator male sling for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence.

AIMS: To update the 2-year outcomes of the TOMS™ transobturator male sling for treating post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (pRP-UI) in a group of patients previously evaluated at 1 year. METHODS: We prospectively followed 40 patients with pRP-UI before and 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation of the TOMS™ transobturator male sling. Urinary symptoms were evaluated using the following questionnaires: USP, ICIQ, UCLA-PCI (urinary bother domain), PGI-I, and daily pad use. Success was defined as patients wearing no or only one security pad. We also report on any other surgical procedures for treating persistent incontinence during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Of 40 patients included in the 1-year follow-up, seven required additional surgical treatment. In the remaining patients (n = 33), significant improvement (P < 0.001) compared to baseline was seen, and a subsequent tendency (non-significant) toward impairment was noted throughout the three postoperative follow-ups for the ICIQ (14.4 ± 4.4 [baseline], 7.6 ± 5.7 [6 months], 8.1 ± 5.6 [12 months], 8.9 ± 5.5 [24 months]), USP-stress urinary (6.7 ± 2.2, 2.8 ± 2.4, 2.8 ± 2.4, 3.2 ± 2.8), ULCA-PCI-urinary bother (10.0 ± 12.5, 66.0 ± 33.0, 64.0 ± 31.5, 62.0 ± 30.7) scores, and pad use (2.5 ± 1.2, 0.7 ± 1.1, 0.8 ± 1.2, 0.9 ± 1.2). Significant impairment in postoperative PGI-I (6.2 ± 0.9, 6.1 ± 0.9, 5.8 ± 1.1, P = 0.028) and USP-overactive bladder symptoms scores (5.4 ± 3.6 [6 months] vs. 6.6 ± 3.7 [24 months], P = 0.046) were noted. A total of 18 (54.5%), 17 (51.5%), and 15 (45.5%) patients wore no postoperative pad, respectively. CONCLUSION: Approximately half of the patients continue to wear no pad 2 years after TOMS™ transobturator male sling implantation. However, a tendency toward impaired continence, possibly associated with overactive bladder symptoms, was noted.

Is it worth continuing sexual rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy with intracavernous injection of alprostadil for more than 1 year?

INTRODUCTION: Intracavernous alprostadil injection (IAI) is a widely used treatment for sexual rehabilitation (SR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). It is unknown whether the continuation of IAI beyond 1 year continues to improve erectile function. AIMS: To assess evolution of sexual function in patients using IAI who are nonresponsive to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) between 12 (M12) and 24 (M24) months after RP. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 75 men with a nerve-sparing laparoscopic RP, who had normal preoperative erectile function, and who regularly used IAI for SR for at least 24 months. At M12, no patients had responded to PDE5i. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 12 and 24 months, sexual function was assessed with the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15, and erection hardness score (EHS) with and without IAI. We also assessed the satisfaction rate with IAI, injection-related penile pain, and satisfaction of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by using t-tests for paired data and Spearman's rho correlation coefficients to assess the relationships between scores at M12 and M24. RESULTS: Improvement of nocturnal erection was noted (UCLA-PCI, question 25); however, no significant difference was found for IIEF-erectile function with (19.60 ± 9.80 vs. 18.07 ± 10.44) and without IAI (4.63 ± 2.93 vs. 4.92 ± 4.15), UCLA-PCI-sexual bother (37.14 ± 21.45 vs. 37.54 ± 19.67), nor the EHS score with (2.97 ± 1.30 vs. 2.57 ± 1.30) and without IAI (0.67 ± 1.11 vs. 0.76 ± 0.10). The rate of satisfaction with treatment decreased over time (66.6% vs. 46.7%, P = 0.013). Improved response to IAI at M12 was not correlated to improvement in spontaneous erections at M24. CONCLUSION: The response to IAI remained stable after 2 years of treatment, and no significant improvement of spontaneous erections during intercourse attempts was found between M12 and M24. Patients should be informed of the limited effect of IAI on natural erections after 1 year. Yiou R, Bütow Z, Parisot J, Binhas M, Lingombet O, Augustin D, de la Taille A, and Audureau E. Is it worth continuing sexual rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy with intracavernous injection of alprostadil for more than 1 year? Sex Med 2015;3:42-48.

Comprehensive evaluation of embarrassment and pain associated with invasive urodynamics.

AIMS: To evaluate pain and embarrassment associated with invasive urodynamics and to determine underlying factors. METHODS: One hundred seventy one consecutive patients referred to our department for invasive urodynamics were evaluated using visual numeric rating scales for sensations of apprehension, pain, and embarrassment during several steps of the procedure (scores ranging from 0 [no symptom] to 10 [worst imaginable symptom]). We also investigated the influence of sex, age, information provided before urodynamics, and medical indication on these sensations. The Spearman correlation, non-parametric test, and logistic regression analysis were performed to determine explicative factors for the most painful sensations. RESULTS: The mean age was 61.0 (standard deviation ± 15 years). The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) apprehension level was 2.9/10 (2.4; 3.4). The mean (95% CI) pain levels at installation on urodynamic table, transurethral catheter insertion (cystometry), and catheter repositioning (urethral pressure profilometry) were 0.3/10 (0.1; 0.5), 1.9/10 (1.6; 2.3), and 1.3/10 (1.0; 1.7), respectively. At catheter insertion, 25% of patients reported a pain level ≥ 4/10. The mean embarrassment level due to urination in front of the doctor was 1.9/10 (1.4; 2.3). Painful sensations reported during the different steps were strongly correlated with each other and with levels of apprehension and embarrassment. Age <54 years (lower quartile) and apprehension level were the only factors associated with painful sensation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that invasive urodynamics is a well-tolerated procedure. However, some patients experience high levels of pain and embarrassment throughout the procedure. Younger age and apprehension were the most influential factors.

Evaluation of urinary symptoms in patients with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence treated with the male sling TOMS.

AIMS: To evaluate stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overactive bladder (OAB), and obstructive symptoms in patients with post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence (pRP-UI) treated with the bulbar compressive sling TOMS, and investigate the effect of each urinary symptom on urinary bother. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively followed 40 patients with pRP-UI before, and 6 and 12 months (T6 and T12, respectively) after implantation of the TOMS sling. Urinary symptoms were evaluated using the following questionnaires: USP, ICIQ, UCLA-PCI (urinary bother domain), PGI-I, and daily pad use. Success was defined as patients wearing no pads or using one security pad. RESULTS: Significant improvement of mean USP-SUI (6.97/9, 3.35, 3.02, P < 0.001) and USP-OAB domains (8.1/21, 5.74, 5.71, P < 0.001), ICIQ (15.15/21, 8.17/21, 8.35/21, P < 0.01), urinary bother (92.5/100, 42.5, 41.87, P < 0.001), and pad number (2.78, 1.01, 1.03, P < 0.001) were noted between baseline, T6, and T12. At baseline, 32 (80%) patients reported urge incontinence. Urinary bother strongly correlated with UPS-SUI but not with UPS-OAB score. At T12, 22 (55%) patients with pad use were considered cured, and 13 (32.5%) patients reported a greatly improved urinary tract condition (PGI-I). Improvement of USP-SUI and USP-OAB scores correlated with improvement of ICIQ and PGI scores. The USP-obstructive domain remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: The TOMS sling improves SUI and OAB symptoms without generating obstructive symptoms. OAB symptoms including urge incontinence reported by most patients were not a major concern at baseline; however, improvement of these symptoms was associated with improvement of continence and PGI-I scores.

Erection hardness score for the evaluation of erectile dysfunction: further psychometric assessment in patients treated by intracavernous prostaglandins injections after radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects quality of life in patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP). The Erection Hardness Score (EHS) is a single-item scale that has demonstrated good psychometric properties for assessing erectile function (EF) in patients treated by sildenafil, but its applicability to other treatment contexts has not yet been tested. AIM: This study aims to test the validity and time and treatment responsiveness of the EHS to assess ED in men with post-RP ED treated with alprostadil injections. METHODS: This is a 1-year follow-up cohort study of 75 patients treated by RP for localized prostate cancer in a urology department setting between January 2007 and December 2008. Data were prospectively collected at 6 and 12 months post-RP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The EHS, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) reference questionnaire, the Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ), and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) were collected. Convergent validity (Spearman correlation coefficients with IIEF domains), known-groups validity (comparing EHS scores across ED severity groups), time and treatment responsiveness (effect size with/without treatment and over the follow-up period), and predictive ability (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC-ROC]) were analyzed for this study. RESULTS: The EHS showed good convergent validity (all Spearman coefficients significant at the P<0.05 level), adequate known-groups validity (global differentiation between IIEF-EF severity groups; P<0.001), and treatment responsiveness (effect size: +1.8 [6 months], +2.1 [12 months]), but limited time responsiveness and predictive ability of the EHS for a normal EF at 12 months follow-up when compared with the IIEF-EF domain (AUC-ROC: 0.72 vs. 0.85; P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the overall good psychometric properties of the EHS in patients with post-RP ED treated with alprostadil injections. However, evidence for limited predictive validity and responsiveness to change over time should be considered for its use in clinical follow-up in this population.

Sexual quality of life in women partnered with men using intracavernous alprostadil injections after radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The effects of intracavernous alprostadil injection (IAI), a primary treatment for post-radical prostatectomy (RP) erectile dysfunction (ED) (pRPED), on the sex life of women partnered with men who have undergone RP have received little attention. AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate the sexual quality of life in female partners of men receiving IAIs for pRPED. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the sex lives of 152 women partnered with men who were being treated for pRPED with IAI and previously had normal erectile function. Women completed the Index of Sexual Life (ISL) questionnaire 1 year after their partner's RP. Male patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15), the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) questionnaire, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), and the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) urinary function questionnaire. Penile pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests, Spearman correlation, and multiple linear regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Female sexual life satisfaction (SLS), sexual drive (SD), and general life satisfaction (GLS) were assessed using the ISL questionnaire. RESULTS: Mean ages for the 104 couples included were 62.3 and 59.8 years for the men and women, respectively. Mean ISL, SD, SLS, and GLS scores at 12 months were 25.4, 3.8, 14.1, and 7.5, respectively. ISL scores were strongly correlated with IIEF-15 domains, mainly erectile function (r > 0.41, P < 0.00002) and intercourse satisfaction (r > 0.27, P < 0.005). Age and VAS, ICIQ, and UCLA-PCI scores were negatively correlated with some ISL domains. IIEF-15 erectile function and intercourse satisfaction were the most significant domains predicting female SLS. An IIEF-15 erectile function of 25 corresponded to a 75% chance of an SLS score ≥18. CONCLUSION: Indexes of female sexual quality of life were low overall but were highly correlated with the partner's response level to IAI treatment. IAI-related pain, increased age, and poor urinary function of the male partner appear to negatively impact female sex life.

Sexual rehabilitation and penile pain associated with intracavernous alprostadil after radical prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Intracavernous alprostadil injection (IAI) is widely used for sexual rehabilitation (SR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, the rate of spontaneous erection recovery with IAI remains unclear, and IAI causes pain that may hinder SR. AIMS: To assess SR in IAI users after RP and to evaluate the course and impact on SR of postinjection penile pain. METHODS: We prospectively studied 87 patients who underwent nerve-sparing laparoscopic RP, reported normal preoperative erectile function, and used IAI for 12 months. Patients started with 2.5 µg alprostadil and were advised to increase the dose gradually until erection hardness allowed vaginal penetration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 6 and 12 months, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) and Erection Hardness Score (EHS) were determined with and without IAI, and injection-related penile pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale. Correlations linking penile pain, IIEF-15, and EHS scores were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean alprostadil dose was 8.1 µg after 6 months and 9.9 µg after 12 months. With/without IAI, mean IIEF-15 scores for erectile and orgasmic function and mean EHS score were 14.6/4.6, 4.1/2.1, and 2.5/0.4, respectively, after 6 months; and 17.2/5.4, 4.9/2.6, and 2.7/0.9 after 12 months. Pain scores were 3.2±2.5/10 and 2.5±2.5/10 after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Pain intensity correlated with erectile function (r=-0.23), intercourse satisfaction (r=-0.23), and overall satisfaction (r=-0.24) after 6 months but not after 12 months. Follow-up was short and only patients who used IAI for 12 months were included. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who were willing and able to use IAI, erectile function improved after 1 year but remained below preoperative levels. The adverse impact of pain on SR was significant during the first 6 months and diminished over time. These data may help to counsel IAI users with painful erections.