The effect of variation in arm position on sagittal spinal alignment.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective radiographic analysis of sagittal alignment in patients with and without previous spinal fusion. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of variation of arm position on the segmental, regional, and global sagittal radiographic spinal alignment. In addition, to determine whether spinal fusion has any influence on the effect of variation in arm position on the sagittal spinal alignment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Importance of segmental, regional, and global sagittal alignment has been widely promoted. However, no mention has been made of arm positioning during a lateral spinal radiograph and the resultant effects it may have on sagittal alignment and balance. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 40 consecutive patients with and 40 consecutive patients without a previous spinal fusion was performed. The patients had lateral long cassette radiographs performed in a standardized fashion with the first radiograph obtained with the patient's arms raised horizontally forward at 90 degrees of flexion at the shoulder, and the second radiograph obtained with arms raised horizontally forward at 30 degrees of flexion at the shoulder. Standard segmental, regional, and global sagittal alignments were measured and statistically compared. RESULTS: In comparing group 1 (patients with spinal fusion) to group 2 (patients without spinal fusion), there was no statistically significant difference in segmental and regional sagittal alignments. However, positioning the arms at 90 degrees versus 30 degrees resulted in a negative shift of the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) in patients that was statistically significant (P = 0.038) for those with (-6 mm at 90 degrees vs +4 mm at 30 degrees ), but not (P = 0.119) for those patients without (-8 mm at 90 degrees vs -4mm at 30 degrees ) a previous spinal fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings in this study, the authors recommend positioning the arms at 30 degrees of forward flexion from the vertical when obtaining a long cassette lateral radiograph of the entire spine.

Comparison of push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliotic curves.

STUDY DESIGN: A comparative evaluation of supine right and left lateral-bending radiographs and push-prone radiographs in patients with thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis to determine postoperative correction of the curve. OBJECTIVES: To determine the difference in the ability of the push-prone radiograph and the supine lateral-bending radiograph to predict postoperative coronal alignment for primary thoracolumbar and lumbar curves managed with an anterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Right and left supine side-bending radiographs are the standard means of evaluating curve flexibility before surgery in idiopathic scoliosis. A push-prone radiograph also has been obtained at the authors' institution as a single dynamic radiographic assessment of forced correction of the primary curve and resultant effects on compensatory curves above and below the fusion. METHODS: Preoperative standing, supine right and left lateral-bending, and push-prone radiographs were performed in 40 patients who underwent anterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. Postoperative standing radiographs of the spine were obtained at 3 months after surgery. Measurements on all the radiographs included the coronal Cobb angle, the angle of the lowest instrumented vertebra to the horizontal, the rotation of the lowest instrumented vertebra, and the distance of the midpoint of the lowest instrumented vertebra from the center sacral line. RESULTS: The lateral-bending and the push-prone radiographs predicted less correction of the Cobb angle and the angle of the lowest instrumented vertebra to the horizontal than was achieved after surgery. However, the push-prone radiograph was superior to the lateral-bending radiograph in accurately predicting the postoperative correction of the rotation of the lowest instrumented vertebra as well as the translation of the lowest instrumented vertebra from the center sacral line. CONCLUSIONS: The push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs are similar in predicting less correction of the Cobb angle after anterior spinal surgery. The push-prone radiograph helps in determining the effects that correction of the primary curve has on the curves above and below the level of fusion by better predicting the translational correction of the lowest instrumented vertebra and the rotation of the lowest instrumented vertebra.