A proposal for developing a large patient population cohort for longterm safety monitoring in rheumatoid arthritis. OMERACT Drug Safety Working Party.

This paper proposes the creation of an objectively acquired reference database to more accurately characterize the incidence and longterm risk of relatively infrequent, but serious, adverse events. Such a database would be maintained longitudinally to provide for ongoing comparison with new rheumatologic drug safety databases collecting the occurrences and treatments of rare events. We propose the establishment of product-specific registries to prospectively follow a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who receive newly approved therapies. In addition, a database is required of a much larger cohort of RA patients treated with multiple second line agents of sufficient size to enable case-controlled determinations of the relative incidence of rare but serious events in the treated (registry) versus the larger disease population. The number of patients necessary for agent-specific registries and a larger patient population adequate to supply a matched case-control cohort will depend upon estimates of the detectability of an increased incidence over background. We suggest a system to carry out this proposal that will involve an umbrella organization, responsible for establishment of this large patient cohort, envisioned to be drawn from around the world.

Comparative effects of nabumetone, sulindac, and ibuprofen on renal function.

OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) have been associated with hemodynamically mediated acute renal failure. There appear to be differences among NSAID in producing this effect. We compare renal effects of ibuprofen, sulindac, and nabumetone. METHODS: Seventeen women over age 56 receiving hydrochlorothiazide and fosinopril for hypertension who had osteoarthritis requiring NSAID received 3 different NSAID to evaluate potential varying renal effects. In an investigator blinded randomized study, patients received nabumetone, sulindac, or ibuprofen for 1 month with intervening 2 week control periods. After each period renal function was assessed by inulin and para-aminohippurate clearances and urinary prostaglandins were measured. RESULTS: No overall statistical differences among the NSAID were observed. However, there were clinically meaningful differences during ibuprofen therapy: 4 patients developed a clinically significant decrease in renal function; during sulindac therapy one of these also developed a clinically significant decrease in renal function. During nabumetone there were 0 episodes of clinically significant decrease in renal function. Using Gomez equations, glomerular hydrostatic pressure and afferent and efferent arteriolar resistances were estimated. None changed overall during any intervention. However, the 4 patients who developed decreased renal function while taking ibuprofen were analyzed separately. Glomerular hydrostatic pressure decreased 15%; afferent arteriolar resistance increased 85%. These changes were associated with marked decreases in vasodilatory prostaglandins compared to patients receiving ibuprofen who did not develop decreases in renal function. CONCLUSION: There are differences in effect on renal function among NSAID. These can be correlated with specific alterations in suppression of the cyclooxygenase system cascade and related to changes in the hemodynamic control of glomerular filtration.

Controlled evaluation of nabumetone in the treatment of active adult rheumatoid arthritis. Nabumetone versus naproxen double-blind parallel study.

Nabumetone is a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Therapy with nabumetone 1,000 mg given at bedtime was compared with naproxen 250 mg given twice daily in a prospective double-blind study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Both drugs were found to be efficacious in a comparable fashion. Both drugs were well tolerated in terms of patient withdrawal rates, which were 5 and 8 percent, respectively. Gastrointestinal side effects were the most commonly encountered problem. Nabumetone holds promise as an important new therapeutic approach in arthritis.

Six-month multi-center study comparing nabumetone with naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

This six-month, double-blind, controlled, randomized, parallel study at 13 medical centers compared the safety and efficacy of nabumetone (1,000 mg taken at bedtime) with that of naproxen (250 mg twice daily) in the treatment of osteoarthritis in symptomatic adult outpatients. Five efficacy parameters were measured: patients' assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, physicians' assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, and physicians' assessment of pain with respect to a declined activity. All 489 patients who took medication were included in the evaluation of safety, and 455 patients (227 in the nabumetone group and 228 in the naproxen group) were evaluated for efficacy. Significant improvement in all five efficacy parameters occurred in both groups. No significant differences were found between the two groups at the end of the study in any of the five efficacy parameters. Twenty-three percent of nabumetone and 17 percent of naproxen patients withdrew from the study for lack of efficacy. At least one possible or probable treatment-related adverse experience was reported for 45 percent of nabumetone-treated patients and 42 percent of those given naproxen, and in 19 percent of the nabumetone-treated and 18 percent of the naproxen-treated patients these experiences were moderate or severe. However, only 7 percent of patients in each group withdrew from the study due to adverse experiences. Nabumetone and naproxen have comparable safety and efficacy, suggesting that a single, nighttime dose of nabumetone is a convenient, effective, and safe treatment for osteoarthritis.