Impact of Selective Dry Cow Therapy on Antimicrobial Consumption, Udder Health, Milk Yield, and Culling Hazard in Commercial Dairy Herds.

The main objective of the study was to evaluate whether or not implementing selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) on commercial dairy farms reduces antimicrobial consumption without negatively affecting future performances when compared to blanket dry cow therapy (BDCT). Twelve commercial herds in the Flemish region of Belgium with overall good udder health management were enrolled in a randomized control trial, including 466 cows that were assigned to a BDCT (n = 244) or SDCT (n = 222) group within herds. Cows in the SDCT group were dried off with internal teat sealants combined or not with long-acting antimicrobials according to a predefined algorithm based on test-day somatic cell count (SCC) data. Total antimicrobial use for udder health between drying off and 100 days in milk was significantly lower in the SDCT group (i.e., a mean of 1.06 defined the course dose) compared to the BDCT group (i.e., a mean of 1.25 defined the course dose), although with substantial variation between herds. Test-day SCC values, milk yield, and the clinical mastitis and culling hazard in the first 100 days in milk did not differ between the BDCT and SDCT groups. SCC-based and algorithm-guided SDCT is suggested to decrease the overall use of antimicrobials without jeopardizing cows' udder health and milk yield.

Investigation of differential somatic cell count as a potential new supplementary indicator to somatic cell count for identification of intramammary infection in dairy cows at the end of the lactation period.

The objective of this study was to investigate the new differential somatic cell count (DSCC) as a supplementary indicator to SCC for the identification of intramammary infection (IMI) in dairy cows at the end of the lactation period. Different approaches for identification of cows with IMI (i.e. often based on SCC) and targeted antimicrobial treatment of those rather than of all cows have been developed (i.e. selective dry cow treatment). Recently, DSCC representing the proportion of polymorphonuclear neutrophils and lymphocytes, has been introduced as an additional indicator for the presence of IMI. We used the last dairy herd improvement (DHI) samples taken within 42 d prior to dry-off as well as hand-stripped samples collected within 5 days prior to dry-off to measure DSCC and SCC. The bacteriological status was determined using quarter foremilk samples collected close to drying off. In total, 582 cows were dried off during our study but not all of them could be included in the data analysis for different reasons (e.g. incomplete data, samples too old for reliable determination of SCC and DSCC, contamination). Eventually, the final data set comprised of 310 cows of which 64 and 149 were infected with major and minor pathogens, respectively, and 97 were uninfected. The area under receiver-operating characteristics curves (AUC) were calculated to compare the diagnostic abilities of the different parameters. The AUC for identification of IMI by major pathogens when using the combination of DSCC and SCC was 0.64 compared to 0.62 for SCC alone and 0.62 for DSCC alone. The different parameters were further compared based on test characteristics and predictive values. For example, classifying cows as infected based on a cut-off of 200,000 cells/ml for SCC alone and in terms of using DSCC combined with SCC based on either >60% and/or >200,000 cells/ml, the sensitivity changed from 47 to 66% and the specificity from 74 to 54%. At the same time, the negative predictive value changed from 84 to 86% and the positive predictive value from 32 to 27%. Test characteristics and predictive values of the parameters DSCC and SCC were similar using DHI and hand-stripped samples. In conclusion, our study provides first indications on test characteristics and predictive values for the combination of DSCC and SCC. However, more work on this subject and the actual practical application is needed.

Absence of zoonotic hepatitis E virus infection in Flemish dairy cows.

Recently, infectious HEV particles were discovered in milk and fecal samples of dairy cows in China. Given the recent increase of autochthonous HEV infections in Europe, we wanted to assess whether cows constitute an HEV reservoir in this region and hence may be responsible for the advance of HEV through consumption of cow produce. To verify the zoonotic risk cows potentially pose towards European consumers, we screened >10% of dairy milk farms in Flanders, Belgium for the presence of HEV. A quarter of these housed both cows and pigs, the latter a well-known reservoir for HEV. Milk and fecal samples were analyzed for the presence of HEV RNA and HEV-specific antibodies. Despite the fact that HEV is circulating amongst pig farms in Flanders and proof of active HEV infection in the pigs of at least one of the mixed farms included in our study, we could not detect any sign of active or past HEV infection in cows. The HEV prevalence in our study was 0%, with a 99.99% confidence interval (CI) for HEV RNA and anti-HEV antibody of [0%-2.30%] and [0%-4.23%] respectively. Our results suggest that, at least in Flanders, cows are not an HEV reservoir and hence do not pose a major health risk towards humans.