Sarcoid-like reaction in malignant melanoma exacerbated with pembrolizumab therapy case report.

Sarcoid Like Reaction (SLR) is a localized non-caseating epithelioid granulomatous reaction seen secondary to certain immunotherapies and malignancies. Invasive melanoma, while being associated with onset of sarcoidosis, has not shown to directly induce SLR in the literature. We present the case of a 68-year-old male with malignant melanoma, who was found to have SLR prior to starting immunotherapy, which worsened while on pembrolizumab. This case highlights the challenge of distinguishing between drug-induced SLR and melanoma-induced SLR, and the implications in terms of management.

Detection of microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) status by targeted plasma-based genotyping in metastatic breast cancer.

We evaluate microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and the association with clinico-genomic characteristics. Patients with MSI-H in cfDNA (Guardant360®, 74 gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) with MBC are identified. We conduct a retrospective review. The median number of alterations and a median maximum mutant allelic fraction (MAF) in MSI-H and non-MSI-H cohorts are compared with Mann-Whitney U-test. Of 6718 patients with breast cancer with ≥1 plasma NGS alteration, 42 (0.63%) have MSI-H. A median number of genomic alterations per sample is 11 in MSI-H vs. 3 in non-MSI-H (Mann-Whitney U-test p < 0.0001) and the median maximum MAF is 16.8% in MSI-H vs. 2.6% in non-MSI-H (Mann-Whitney U-test p < 0.0001). The co-existing genomic landscape is heterogeneous. The median response duration for seven patients receiving immunotherapy is 92 days (range 29-273 days). CfDNA can identify MSI-H in MBC. Research is needed to validate immunotherapy usage in cfDNA-detected MSI-H MBC.

Erlotinib plus either pazopanib or placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial with correlated serum proteomic signatures.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with erlotinib plus pazopanib versus erlotinib plus placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with progressive-stage IV NSCLC after either 1 or 2 previous chemotherapy regimens were randomized to receive erlotinib (150 mg by mouth daily) with either pazopanib (600 mg by mouth daily) or placebo. During treatment, patients were evaluated every 8 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After a study amendment, pretreatment serum specimens for the VeriStrat assay were collected. The predictive value of the VeriStrat score (good vs poor) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in the overall population and in each treatment group. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two eligible patients were randomized between February 2010 and February 2011. PFS was prolonged with erlotinib plus pazopanib versus erlotinib plus placebo (median, 2.6 vs 1.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.58; P = .001). There was no difference in the OS of the 2 groups. A good VeriStrat score predicted longer PFS and OS in the entire group and predicted longer PFS in the subgroup receiving erlotinib plus pazopanib. The addition of pazopanib increased toxicity, and this was consistent with the known toxicity profile. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of pazopanib to erlotinib in an unselected group of patients with previously treated NSCLC improved PFS and increased treatment-related toxicity, but it had no influence on OS. The efficacy of both regimens was modest. Patients receiving erlotinib plus pazopanib had longer PFS if they had a good VeriStrat score versus a poor one. Cancer 2018;124:2355-64. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Bendamustine, bortezomib and rituximab produces durable complete remissions in patients with previously untreated, low grade lymphoma.

This Phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine, bortezomib and rituximab in patients with previously untreated low-grade lymphoma. Eligible patients had low grade lymphoma with no previous systemic disease treatment. Treatment for all patients was given in 28-day cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8 and 15 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2-6; bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 2; and bortezomib 1·6 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and 15. Patients were permitted to begin maintenance treatment with rituximab 6 months after completion of study treatment and after 6-month follow-up assessments had been conducted. Fifty-four eligible patients were enrolled. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were leucopenia (28%), neutropenia (30%) and lymphopenia (17%). There were no treatment-related deaths and 1 unrelated death on study (embolic stroke). The overall response rate was 94% for all patients. The median follow-up was 54 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival and overall survival at 36 months were 75% and 88%, respectively. The treatment regimen was well tolerated and produced high response rates. Further study of this regimen in patients with previously untreated lymphoma is warranted.

A Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Panitumumab Followed by Evaluation for Resection in Patients With Metastatic KRAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases Only.

BACKGROUND: Patients with liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for potentially curative resection may become resectable with more aggressive chemotherapy regimens. In this nonrandomized trial, we evaluated folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor panitumumab as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type mCRC with liver-only metastasis. METHODS: Patients received FOLFOXIRI (5-FU, 3,200 mg/m(2), 48-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion; leucovorin, 200 mg/m(2) i.v.; irinotecan, 125 mg/m(2); oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m(2) i.v.) and panitumumab (6 mg/kg i.v.) on day 1 of 14-day cycles. Patients were restaged and evaluated for surgery every four cycles. Planned enrollment was originally 49 patients. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (median age: 55 years; 87% male) received a median 6 cycles of treatment (range: 1-33 cycles); 10 patients (67%) were surgical candidates at baseline. Twelve patients were evaluable for clinical response; 9 (60%) achieved partial response. Ten patients underwent surgery; all were complete resections and pathologic partial response. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events included diarrhea (33%) and rash (20%). Enrollment was halted because of emerging data on expanded KRAS/NRAS mutations beyond the region we initially examined, and the potential for negative interaction with oxaliplatin-based therapy. Eight patients underwent expanded KRAS/NRAS analysis outside exon 2; no additional mutations were found. CONCLUSION: KRAS/NRAS mutations outside the region tested in this study were recently shown to be associated with inferior survival on similar treatment regimens. Therefore, this trial was stopped early. This regimen remains a viable option for patients with liver-only mCRC in the KRAS/NRAS wild-type population. Enrollment criteria on future studies should include testing for the newly identified mutations.

The management of fatigue in cancer patients.

Severe, debilitating fatigue is common in cancer patients. For many, it is the symptom that interferes most with normal routines. Virtually every modality used to treat cancer may cause fatigue, as can complications of the disease such as sleep disturbances, infections, malnutrition, hypothyroidism, and anemia. There is a significant overlap between depression and fatigue in many patients. Given the high prevalence of cancer-related fatigue, frequent assessment of patients is essential. The evaluation should include an attempt to identify reversible causes of fatigue, and screening for depression. However, many cancer patients suffer from fatigue even in the absence of any identifiable, reversible cause. For these patients, consideration can be given to suitable exercise programs, educational support and counseling, and energy conservation strategies. A trial of a stimulant medication is also reasonable. Given the heterogeneity of patients, individualized approaches are needed. For anemic patients undergoing chemotherapy, erythropoietic agents can increase hemoglobin levels. The impact of these drugs on fatigue and quality of life is uncertain. Recent reports of increased mortality and thrombotic events in cancer patients treated with epoetin require further investigation.