Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
Urol Oncol ; 41(6): 293.e15-293.e21, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36990941

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of bladder-preserving treatment vs. cystectomy on work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) among patients with bladder cancer. METHODS: Using cross-sectional survey data, we constructed 2-part models involving both logistic and linear prediction to describe the relationship between WPAI and treatment modality among patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). RESULTS: A total of 848 patients were included in the analysis. Patients with NMIBC who had cystectomy were more likely to experience activity impairment compared with those receiving bladder-preserving treatment (OR: 4.25, 95% CI: 2.28-7.93). Among patients with MIBC, cystectomy was protective against increasing presenteeism (e^ß: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.23-0.71) and productivity loss (e^ß: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.21-0.88); however, the opposite effect was seen for absenteeism treatment (e^ß: 4.82, 95% CI: 1.72-13.49). CONCLUSION: Cystectomy increased the odds of experiencing activity impairment for patients with NMIBC. However, for patients with MIBC, cystectomy appears to be protective for presenteeism and productivity loss. Further work is needed in order to better understand these important relationships and improve both patient counseling and shared decision-making.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Cistectomia , Invasividade Neoplásica
3.
J Urol ; 209(1): 150-160, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36067365

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this mixed methods study was to investigate patient and provider perceptions of repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumors to improve counseling as new nonsurgical treatment modalities for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer emerge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative data were collected via a web-based survey through the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network of patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer who had undergone at least 1 transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate associations of patient demographics and clinical variables with treatment preference. Qualitative data were collected with 60 in-depth telephone interviews with patients (n=40) and urologists (n=20) to understand experiences with bladder cancer and transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Telephone interviews were conducted by trained qualitative experts. Transcripts were imported into Dedoose to facilitate analysis. RESULTS: Survey data of 352 patients showed 210 respondents (60%) preferred repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor while 142 (40%) preferred intravesical chemoablation. Patients who preferred repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor were more likely to prioritize initial treatment effectiveness (63%), whereas those who preferred chemoablation prioritized risk of recurrence (55%). Variables associated with a preference for intravesical chemoablation included U.S. residence (OR=2; 95% CI 1.1, 3.8), or if they expressed their reason for treatment preference as priority of recurrence risk over effectiveness (OR=14.6; 95% CI 7.4, 28.5). Predominant interview themes varied across participants, with patients but not urologists emphasizing the emotional toll of the procedure along with the need for improved counseling regarding recurrence, terminology, and cancer-related signs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist in the way patients and urologists perceive repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor for bladder cancer. Understanding transurethral resection of bladder tumor perception will aid in shared decision making as novel treatments emerge for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.


Assuntos
Ressecção Transuretral de Bexiga , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Percepção
4.
J Urol ; 208(3): 580-588, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35640276

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Optima II ("OPTimized Instillation of Mitomycin for Bladder Cancer Treatment," clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03558503) was a phase 2b trial evaluating a nonsurgical alternative as a primary treatment for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients received 6 weekly instillations of UGN-102, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel. This is the first study to report on patient-reported side effects of UGN-102. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients enrolled in Optima II from 20 sites. Of these 63 patients, 44 were in the cohort completing a quarterly patient-reported outcome measure assessing side effects. Changes in side effects were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Associations of 3-month outcomes with demographic and clinical characteristics were examined with regression, controlling for baseline values. Ten of 44 patients (23%) were interviewed after the trial to understand tolerability for future patients making treatment decisions. Transcripts were double-coded using standard methods. RESULTS: In the patient-reported outcome measure cohort (44), 61% were men, 57% aged 65+ years and 89% were non-Hispanic White. UGN-102 did not cause decrements in patient-reported urinary symptoms, bloating/flatulence or malaise at the primary endpoint of 3 months. Sexual function mildly worsened. Future health worries improved. Demographics were not correlated with changes. Clinically, sexual function was correlated with new NMIBC and bloating/flatulence was associated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor within 12 months. In interviews, patients appreciated a nonsurgical alternative, would recommend the gel to other patients and would choose the gel over surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A nonsurgical, chemoablative gel (UGN-102) used as a primary treatment for NMIBC offers a more patient-centered therapeutic approach than standard treatments.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Administração Intravesical , Adulto , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Flatulência/induzido quimicamente , Flatulência/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Mitomicina/efeitos adversos , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
5.
Urol Oncol ; 40(1): 9.e19-9.e27, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34162499

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree of discomfort among patients with bladder cancer undergoing office-based cystoscopy and identify factors and interventions that influence discomfort and anxiety. METHODS: We conducted a survey of the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network (BCAN PSN) to investigate the degree of discomfort associated with office-based cystoscopy and prevalence of interventions used to reduce discomfort. All patients had undergone at least one previous cystoscopy. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with moderate-to-severe cystoscopy discomfort. RESULTS: Among 488 BCAN PSN respondents (50% response rate), 392 responded with demographic data and discomfort score. Cystoscopy was associated with moderate-to-severe discomfort in 52% of patients. Respondents who reported moderate-to-severe discomfort were more likely to describe their most recent cystoscopy discomfort as worse than prior (P<0.001) and to be interested in planning discomfort mitigation for cystoscopy (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, gender was the only factor independently associated with discomfort, with women reporting less discomfort than men (OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.37-0.95,P=0.03). Patients reported a wide variety of cystoscopy-specific interventions with differing perceived effectiveness, the most common being intraurethral lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of patients undergoing office-based cystoscopy for bladder cancer report moderate-to-severe discomfort, constituting a substantial problem among patients undergoing the procedure. Future large pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials are needed to better understand which interventions work most effectively to reduce discomfort associated with cystoscopy.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/etiologia , Cistoscopia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Idoso , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico , Autorrelato
6.
Urol Oncol ; 39(3): 193.e13-193.e19, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863122

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network's (BCAN) Patient Survey Network established a diverse bladder cancer patient community who contribute to the prioritization of bladder cancer research topics through surveys and summits. This study describes our experience establishing an online learning program to train this population in research methods specific to bladder cancer and to subsequently engage patients in various stages of bladder cancer research. METHODS: We created online learning modules that addressed scientific concepts related to bladder cancer, creating the patient empowerment through engagement in research (PEER) program. Bladder cancer patients and caregivers who completed the program were invited to participate in the annual BCAN Bladder Cancer Summit to develop research study concepts. We then facilitated the promoting implementation of patient engagement in research conference to identify methods of connecting patient research advocates with research teams and find ways to disseminate patient-centered outcomes research. RESULTS: After completing the online training, 2 cohorts of PEER trainees attended the 2017 (n = 19) and 2018 (n = 18) Bladder Cancer Summits. These research advocates contributed to the prioritization of bladder cancer research topics that appeared on the Patient Survey Network and developed 3 patient-centered research studies. BCAN research advocates participated in promoting implementation of patient engagement the following year (n = 57) and identified these priorities: (1) the need to expand the patient research advocate cohort, (2) the need to streamline links between patient research advocates and research teams, and (3) approaches for patient-centered dissemination of research results. CONCLUSIONS: The PEER program provides an exemplar for disease-specific research training for fostering patient engagement in research. This framework can be extrapolated to facilitate patient engagement in the research of other disease processes and malignancies.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Participação do Paciente , Projetos de Pesquisa , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Autorrelato
7.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33042200

RESUMO

Applying geometric and dimensional tolerances (GD&T) to part features in computer-aided design (CAD) software is essential so that the part will function properly and to guide downstream manufacturing and inspection processes. However, it is not well characterized how CAD software implements capabilities for a designer to apply GD&T to a part. Of course, CAD software vendors do their own internal testing of those capabilities and users evaluate CAD software so that it satisfies their CAD modeling requirements. However, there has never been any rigorous public-domain testing of CAD software GD&T implementations. To improve that situation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has developed a system to test implementations of GD&T in CAD software. Representative part geometry with GD&T applied to features was modeled in four of the major CAD systems. Errors with semantic representation and graphical presentation of the GD&T were collected and analyzed. The testing methodology, test results, and data analysis demonstrate how well the CAD system GD&T implementations perform. The testing project results can be used as a basis for future testing, methods, and standards to evaluate defects in GD&T applied to part features.

8.
J Urol ; 204(4): 778-786, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32698717

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patients presenting with microhematuria represent a heterogeneous population with a broad spectrum of risk for genitourinary malignancy. Recognizing that patient-specific characteristics modify the risk of underlying malignant etiologies, this guideline sought to provide a personalized diagnostic testing strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The systematic review incorporated evidence published from January 2010 through February 2019, with an updated literature search to include studies published up to December 2019. Evidence-based statements were developed by the expert Panel, with statement type linked to evidence strength, level of certainty, and the Panel's judgment regarding the balance between benefits and risks/burdens. RESULTS: Microhematuria should be defined as ≥ 3 red blood cells per high power field on microscopic evaluation of a single specimen. In patients diagnosed with gynecologic or non-malignant genitourinary sources of microhematuria, clinicians should repeat urinalysis following resolution of the gynecologic or non-malignant genitourinary cause. The Panel created a risk classification system for patients with microhematuria, stratified as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk for genitourinary malignancy. Risk groups were based on factors including age, sex, smoking and other urothelial cancer risk factors, degree and persistence of microhematuria, as well as prior gross hematuria. Diagnostic evaluation with cystoscopy and upper tract imaging was recommended according to patient risk and involving shared decision-making. Statements also inform follow-up after a negative microhematuria evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with microhematuria should be classified based on their risk of genitourinary malignancy and evaluated with a risk-based strategy. Future high-quality studies are required to improve the care of these patients.


Assuntos
Hematúria/diagnóstico , Algoritmos , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Medição de Risco
9.
J Urol ; 202(6): 1136-1142, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31219763

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The BCAN (Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network) Patient Survey Network identified pain during intravesical procedures as a research priority for patients. Although intraurethral lidocaine is the standard of care in this setting, evidence of its use is equivocal. We systematically reviewed studies of interventions to reduce discomfort during cystoscopy and intravesical therapy of bladder cancer. We performed a meta-analysis of interventions using available randomized, controlled trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Search terms derived from the key questions were incorporated into the literature search constructed by a research librarian and the English medical literature from 1990 to 2017 was accessed. The initial search yielded 626 potential studies and the final review incorporated 62. We combined 12 trials into a meta-analysis with a random effects model of the efficacy of intraurethral lidocaine vs plain lubricant to reduce pain during flexible cystoscopy as measured on a 10-point visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Data from 12 randomized controlled trials in a total of 1,549 patients were included in the final intraurethral lidocaine meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference between visual analogue scale pain scores in patients who underwent flexible cystoscopy with intraurethral lidocaine and plain lubricant was -0.22 (95% CI -0.39--0.05). Evidence was insufficient to evaluate other interventions to mitigate the discomfort of invasive bladder procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Intraurethral lidocaine provides statistically significant pain reduction in men who undergo flexible cystoscopy, particularly with a longer dwell time. The evidence was insufficient for other tested interventions. A prospective study is needed to further clarify interventions to decrease patient discomfort during cystoscopy and other intravesical procedures in a diverse population.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Cistoscopia , Lidocaína/uso terapêutico , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia
11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34877094
12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34877112
13.
Procedia CIRP ; 432016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31579280

RESUMO

Advances in sensing, modeling, and control have made it possible to increase the accuracy of robots, and enable them to perform in dynamic environments. Often, performance deficiencies are not evident until late in the development of the manufacturing process, which delays the beginning of production and may cause damage to parts that have already undergone costly manufacturing steps. The goal of this research is to determine if a robot can meet manufacturing requirements, how to optimally plan robot activities, and to monitor robot processes to track performance. To achieve this, representations of product and manufacturing information and robot capabilities should be carried through the design, process planning, production, and analysis phases. Standards for the exchange of this information have been developed, such as ISO 10303 Part 242 for semantic product and manufacturing information and device kinematics, and the Robot Operating System Industrial specification for robot modeling, path planning, and execution. This paper surveys the relevant technologies and standards needed to enable automated deployment of robots in new application areas.

14.
Lancet ; 360(9336): 872, 2002 Sep 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12243937
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...