National Cooperative Growth Study: 25 Years of Growth Hormone Data, Insights, and Lessons for Future Registries.

BACKGROUND: The National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS) data are reviewed from 1985-2010 to report on final demographic, efficacy, and safety findings, and to illustrate the value of long-term, real-world follow-up to physicians and patients. METHODS: The NCGS was a multicenter, open-label, observational, postmarketing surveillance study of Genentech growth hormone (GH) products for the treatment of children with growth failure in North America. FINDINGS: Data from 65,205 patients representing 240,951 patient-years of experience were collected. All etiological groups had clinically meaningful improvements in near-adult height SDS. Females and African Americans were under-represented in the NCGS with little change in accrual over time. The favorable safety profile of GH was validated through the registry. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-five years of monitoring GH use through the NCGS yielded extensive insight into the utility of GH in various underlying etiologies. Demographic disparities were clear and became evident by analyzing data collected through the registry.

Proceedings from the Turner Resource Network symposium: the crossroads of health care research and health care delivery.

Turner syndrome, a congenital condition that affects ∼1/2,500 births, results from absence or structural alteration of the second sex chromosome. There has been substantial effort by numerous clinical and genetic research groups to delineate the clinical, pathophysiological, cytogenetic, and molecular features of this multisystem condition. Questions about the molecular-genetic and biological basis of many of the clinical features remain unanswered, and health care providers and families seek improved care for affected individuals. The inaugural "Turner Resource Network (TRN) Symposium" brought together individuals with Turner syndrome and their families, advocacy group leaders, clinicians, basic scientists, physician-scientists, trainees and other stakeholders with interest in the well-being of individuals and families living with the condition. The goal of this symposium was to establish a structure for a TRN that will be a patient-powered organization involving those living with Turner syndrome, their families, clinicians, and scientists. The TRN will identify basic and clinical questions that might be answered with registries, clinical trials, or through bench research to promote and advocate for best practices and improved care for individuals with Turner syndrome. The symposium concluded with the consensus that two rationales justify the creation of a TRN: inadequate attention has been paid to the health and psychosocial issues facing girls and women who live with Turner syndrome; investigations into the susceptibility to common disorders such as cardiovascular or autoimmune diseases caused by sex chromosome deficiencies will increase understanding of disease susceptibilities in the general population.

Characteristics of children with the best and poorest first- and second-year growth during rhGH therapy: data from 25 years of the Genentech national cooperative growth study (NCGS).

BACKGROUND: Models assessing characteristics contributing to response to recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) response rarely address growth extremes in both years 1 and 2 or examine how children track from year to year. Using National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS) data, we determined characteristics contributing to responsiveness to rhGH and the pattern of change from years 1 to 2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Height velocity standard deviation score (HV SDS) for 2 years for prepubertal children with idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD) (n = 1899) and idiopathic short stature (ISS) (n = 1186) treated with similar doses for two years were computed. Group 1 = HV SDS < -1; 2 = HV SDS -1 to +1; 3 = HV SDS > +1. RESULTS: For IGHD, mean age was 7.5 years and similar in all groups. Year 1 HV SDS was associated with greater body mass index (BMI) SDS, lower pre-treatment HV, baseline height SDS, greater target height SDS minus height SDS, and lower maximum stimulated GH (P <0.0001). Year 2, 172/271 (73%) in group 1 moved to either group 2 (n = 156) or 3 (n = 16). Year 2 HV SDS was associated with greater year 1 HV SDS (r = 0.045, P <0.0001), greater BMI SDS, taller parents and lower peak GH.For ISS, year 1 HV SDS was associated with greater BMI SDS and lower pre-treatment HV (P ≤0.0001). 109/169 (64%) in group 1 moved to group 2 (n = 90) or group 3 (n = 19). Greater year 2 HV SDS was related to year 1 HV SDS (r = 0.27, P <0.0001). CONCLUSION: For IGHD, multiple characteristics contributed to best first-year response but for ISS, best first-year HV SDS was associated only with BMI SDS and inversely with pre-treatment HV. For both GHD and ISS, year 1 HV SDS was not a strong enough predictor of year 2 HV SDS to use first-year HV alone to determine GH continuation.

Is there "seasonal" variation in height velocity in children treated with growth hormone? Data from the National Cooperative Growth Study.

BACKGROUND: Growth rate In children is reported to have seasonal variability. There are fewer published data regarding seasonal variability while on growth hormone (GH) therapy, and none analyzing growth rate with respect to number of daylight hours. METHODS: We analyzed 11,587 3-month intervals in 2277 prepubertal children (boys ages 3-14 years, girls ages 3-12 years) with idiopathic GH deficiency from the National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS) database. All were naive to recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy. Data were submitted from 31 US study centers. Seasonal variation in height velocity (HV) was assumed to be associated with the average number of daylight hours during the interval of time over which HV was computed. Number of daylight hours was determined from the date of the measurement and the latitude of the study center. Other independent variables evaluated included: height standard deviation score (SDS) at the beginning of the interval, chronologic age at the beginning of the interval, time from the start of rhGH treatment to the middle of the interval, month of the year, body mass index SDS at the beginning of the interval, rhGH dose/kg, mother's height SDS, father's height SDS, and log base 10 of the maximum stimulated GH concentration. RESULTS: All variables examined, except month of the year, correlated significantly with interval HV. There was significant "seasonal" variability at all latitudes, with summer annualized HV being greater than winter HV. This difference was greatest in the first year of therapy (0.146 cm/yr/daylight hour; P < 0.0001) but persisted in subsequent years (0.121 cm/yr/daylight hr; P < 0.0001). The difference increased with distance from the equator. Growth rate over the year was not different among the latitudes reflected in this North American study. CONCLUSIONS: There is "seasonal" variation in growth of children on rhGH therapy that correlates with number of daylight hours. The effect is modest and is greatest in the first year of therapy. Annual growth rate appears to be equal in children among latitudes covered by the US consistent with exposure to an equal number of daylight hours over the year. The physiologic mechanism behind this seasonal variation is not yet understood.

A multi-center controlled trial of growth hormone treatment in children with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated safety and efficacy of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) for improving growth, lean body mass (LBM), pulmonary function, and exercise tolerance in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) and growth restriction. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, controlled clinical trial comparing outcomes in prepubertal children <14 years with CF, randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily rhGH (Nutropin AQ) or no treatment (control) for 12 months, followed by a 6-month observation (month 18). Safety was monitored at each visit, including assessments of glucose tolerance. RESULTS: Sixty-eight subjects were randomized (control n = 32; rhGH n = 36). Mean height standard deviation score (SDS) in the rhGH group increased by 0.5 ± 0.4 at 12 months (mean ± SD, P < 0.001); the control group height SDS remained unchanged. Weight increased by 3.8 ± 1.8 versus 2.8 ± 1.5 kg, (mean ± SD, P = 0.0356) and LBM increased by 3.8 ± 1.8 versus 2.1 ± 1.4 kg (P = 0.0002) in the rhGH group versus controls, respectively. Forced vital capacity increased by 325 ± 319 in the rhGH group compared with 178 ± 152 ml in controls (mean ± SD, P = 0.032). Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec improved in both groups with a significant difference between groups after adjustment for baseline severity (LS mean ± SE: rhGH, 224 ± 37, vs. controls, 108 ± 40 ml; P = 0.04). There was no difference between groups in exercise tolerance (6-min walk distance) at 1 year. Changes in glucose tolerance for the two groups were similar over the 12-month study period, with three subjects developing IGT and one CFRD in each group. One rhGH-treated patient developed increased intracranial pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with rhGH in prepubertal children with CF was effective in promoting growth, weight, LBM, lung volume, and lung flows, and had an acceptable safety profile.

Intracranial hypertension in pediatric patients treated with recombinant human growth hormone: data from 25 years of the Genentech National Cooperative Growth Study.

Intracranial hypertension (IH) is a rare condition in children. However, a relationship between recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy and IH has been well documented. Risk factors were assessed for 70 rhGH-naive patients enrolled in the National Cooperative Growth Study with reports of IH after treatment initiation. Patients with severe growth hormone deficiency, Turner syndrome, chronic renal insufficiency (CRI), and obesity (particularly in the CRI group) were at highest risk of developing IH during the first year of therapy, suggesting initiation of careful early monitoring. In some patients, factors such as corticosteroid use or other chromosomal abnormalities appear to confer a delayed risk of IH, and these patients should be monitored long-term for signs and symptoms of IH.

An observational study to validate the Satisfaction Measure of the Injection of Growth Hormone Therapy (SMIGHTy) questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to psychometrically evaluate a tool to measure adult caregivers' level of satisfaction with the delivery device used to administer injections of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) to a child - the Satisfaction Measure of the Injection of Growth Hormone Therapy (SMIGHTy*) questionnaire. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred caregivers who administer rhGH to a child using an injection device completed the SMIGHTy questionnaire at baseline and 7-14 days later, and also completed other measures of treatment adherence and treatment satisfaction at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SMIGHTy reliability (inter-item and test-retest) and external validity (association with other study measures) were assessed. RESULTS: Analyses revealed good inter-item agreement and test-retest reliability for the SMIGHTy questionnaire. External validity, measured by associations with adherence and other measures of treatment satisfaction, was high. STUDY LIMITATIONS: This study assessed only adult caregivers; the instrument was not validated for use by young or adult patients. CONCLUSIONS: The SMIGHTy instrument is more comprehensive than existing instruments for assessing the growth hormone treatment experience. It is multidimensional, assesses both positive and negative aspects of the treatment experience (Device Satisfaction, Negative Events, Benefits), and has separate measures of overall satisfaction and preference.

Treatment of growth hormone-deficient infants with recombinant human growth hormone to near-adult height: patterns of growth.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine adult statures and linear growth patterns of children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) who began treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in infancy. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with GHD in whom administration of rhGH was initiated at or before 2 years of age and who had achieved near-adult heights (NAH) were identified in the database of the Genentech National Cooperative Growth Study. RESULTS: After beginning treatment at a mean age of 0.9 years and height of -2.3 SD, these subjects achieved mean statures of -0.6, -0.3, and -0.4 SD at 5 and 10 years of age and at NAH, respectively. In 23 patients whose parental heights were known, mean NAH was comparable to the target height. Patients with uncomplicated courses whose heights were normal or tall when spontaneous puberty occurred or was induced realized the tallest NAHs. Patients with severe prenatal or perinatal, congenital and acquired neurologic insults, sexual precocity, or associated illnesses achieved less optimal NAHs. CONCLUSION: A normal pattern of linear growth during childhood and adolescence and satisfactory NAHs can be achieved in the majority of patients when treatment of the GHD subject is begun during infancy.

Bioequivalence studies for three formulations of a recombinant human growth hormone: challenges and lessons learned.

Two bioequivalence (BE) studies in healthy volunteers comparing new formulations of the recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) Nutropin AQ (somatropin [rDNA origin] injection; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) with the currently marketed formulation (5 mg/mL) were conducted to extend available dosing options. All formulations were administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection ranging in volume from 0.25 to 1.0 mL depending on the formulation concentration. Study A was a 2-period crossover design to assess the BE of 5 and 10 mg/mL. The estimate for relative bioavailability (AUC(0-24 h)) was within the prespecified BE interval (0.80-1.25). However, while the C(max) estimate (1.17) was contained within the range for BE, the 90% CI (0.986-1.38) extended beyond the prespecified BE interval. As a result, Study A failed to show BE between the 5 and 10mg/mL formulations. Review of the data showed unexpected increased variability in the observed C(max). Further review of individual data suggested that in 4 subjects, the GH concentration profile of 1 of the 2 injections closely resembled the absorption kinetics of an intramuscular injection rather than an SC injection. Because study conduct may have contributed to these results, we performed a second study, Study B. This study incorporated injection technique training, a defined injection site, and a larger sample size to accommodate variability. It also included a third formulation, creating a 3-period crossover design to assess the BE of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/mL. Study B results demonstrated BE of the new 2.5- and 10-mg/mL formulations to the reference 5-mg/mL formulation, and BE to each other, with all 90% CIs within the BE range of 0.80 to 1.25. Thus the challenge of recognizing that design issues could affect outcomes gave us the tools to perform a second study, and the positive results taught us that demonstrating BE is an issue not only of pharmacology, but also of study methodology and execution.

First-year response to rhGH therapy in children with CKD: a National Cooperative Growth Study Report.

A clear definition of the appropriate growth response during recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment has never been established in the pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. We present here data from Genentech's National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS) on the first-year growth response in prepubertal children with CKD. Using NCGS data, we constructed response curves for the first year of rhGH therapy in 270 (186 males, 84 females) naïve-to-treatment, prepubertal children with CKD prior to transplant or dialysis. Data from both genders were combined because gender was not significantly related to height velocity (p = 0.51). Response to rhGH was expressed as height velocity (HV) in cm/year. Mean, mean + or - 1SD, and mean - 2SD for HV during the first year of rhGH treatment as well as pretreatment HV were plotted versus age. Age-specific HV plots for rhGH-treated children with CKD are presented. At all ages, the first-year mean HV was greater than the mean pretreatment HV. The mean - 2SD for HV in children on rhGH treatment was similar to the mean pretreatment HV. These growth plots will be useful to clinicians for assessing a patient's first-year growth response. We propose that a HV below the mean - 1SD is an inadequate response. These curves may help identify patients with a suboptimal growth response due to confounding medical factors and/or non-compliance.

A stepwise increase in recombinant human growth hormone dosing during puberty achieves improved pubertal growth: a National Cooperative Growth Study report.

UNLABELLED: The magnitude of the pubertal growth spurt contributes to adult height. Children treated with increased doses of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) during puberty have shown improved near adult height (NAH) outcomes that varied by treatment duration. METHODS: Males, in a single clinic, treated with a prepubertal dose of rhGH (0.3 mg/kg/wk) received 0.1 mg/kg/wk dose increases with successive Tanner stages up to 0.6 mg/kg/wk. Changes in height and height SDS from pubertal onset to NAH were assessed in patients attaining NAH after > or =3 years (n = 23) and > or =4 years (n = 16). Using ANCOVA, outcomes were compared to closely matched patients (n = 758) from the National Cooperative Growth Study treated with a fixed dose (0.3 mg/kg/wk) throughout puberty. RESULTS: Compared to matched patients, a 3.6 cm greater increase in mean height gain and a 0.49 greater increase in mean height SDS (p <0.0001) during puberty was observed in patients attaining NAH after > or =3 years. Corresponding values were 3.9 cm and 0.54 (p <0.0001) in patients attaining NAH after > or =4 years. CONCLUSION: Stepwise increases in rhGH improved pubertal height gain when compared to a fixed dose and may represent an alternate approach to managing the patient during puberty.

Stimulant medication use and response to growth hormone therapy: an NCGS database analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Determine (1) frequency of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment and (2) growth responses in growth hormone (GH)-treated children who are receiving ADHD medication versus GH alone. METHODS: Prepubertal children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) or GH deficiency (IGHD) enrolled in Genentech's National Cooperative Growth Study. ADHD treatment was determined by documentation of psycho-stimulant medication use at enrollment. RESULTS: ADHD medication use increased from 0.8% (7/850) in 1985 to 5.8% (752/12,113) in 2005. First-year GH treatment response for ADHD + IGHD versus IGHD: 8.5 +/- 2.0 vs. 9.4 +/- 2.6 cm/year, but when adjusted for age, sex, and enrollment body mass index, the difference is clinically insignificant (-0.4 cm/year). First-year growth was similar in all ISS: 8.1 +/- 1.9 versus 8.6 +/- 2.1 cm/year (ADHD + ISS vs. ISS, an adjusted -0.2-cm/year difference). CONCLUSION: Increasing numbers of GH-treated children are taking ADHD medications and their growth responses during the first year of GH therapy are similar to those not taking ADHD medications.

Growth response, near-adult height, and patterns of growth and puberty in patients with noonan syndrome treated with growth hormone.

CONTEXT: Noonan syndrome (NS) is a heterogeneous genetic disorder characterized by short stature. SETTING: The National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS), a postmarketing observational study of recombinant human GH (rhGH)-treated children, includes a large cohort of children with NS. PATIENTS: We studied NCGS-enrolled prepubertal and pubertal children with NS. MAIN OUTCOMES: Baseline characteristics and growth responses in NS patients with reported near-adult height (NAH) (n = 65) were compared to patients with idiopathic GH deficiency (n = 3007) and Turner syndrome (TS; n = 1378) with reported NAH to identify factors contributing to NAH optimization in NS. RESULTS: NS patients (mean enrollment age, 11.6 yr) received rhGH (mean, 0.33 mg/kg . wk) for a mean of 5.6 yr. No significant difference was observed in Delta height sd score (SDS) between NS (+1.4 +/- 0.7) and TS (+1.2 +/- 0.9). However, Delta height SDS for NS and TS differed significantly from idiopathic GH deficiency (+1.7 +/- 1.0) (P < 0.0001). Mean gain in NAH above projected was 10.9 +/- 4.9 cm (males) and 9.2 +/- 4.0 cm (females). Duration of prepubertal rhGH was an important contributor to prepubertal change in height SDS (r(2) = 0.97). Height SDS at pubertal onset highly correlated with NAH SDS (rho = 0.783; P < 0.0001). Duration of puberty highly correlated with pubertal height gain in centimeters for males (rho = 0.941) and females (rho = 0.882) (P < 0.01). No new adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: rhGH significantly improved height SDS for children with NS at NAH. Duration of prepubertal rhGH and height SDS at puberty were important contributors to NAH. Because starting age of the patients in this report was 11.6 yr, these data suggest that greater growth optimization is possible with earlier initiation of therapy.

Growth hormone responsiveness: peak stimulated growth hormone levels and other variables in idiopathic short stature (ISS): data from the National Cooperative Growth Study.

HYPOTHESIS: In children with idiopathic short stature (ISS), growth hormone (GH) response to a provocative test will be inversely related to the first year response to hGH and be a variable accounting for a degree of responsiveness. BACKGROUND: Because high levels of GH are a characteristic of GH insensitivity, such as in Laron syndrome, it is possible that a high stimulated GH is associated with a lower first year height velocity among children diagnosed as having ISS. METHODS: We examined the relationship between the peak stimulated GH levels in 3 ISS groups; GH >10 -<25, 25-40, and >40 ng/mL and the first year growth response to rhGH therapy. We also looked at 8 other predictor variables (age, sex, height SDS, height age, body mass index (BMI), bone age, dose, and SDS deficit from target parental height. Multiple regression analysis with the first year height as the dependent variable and peak stimulated GH was the primary endpoint. The predictive value of adding each of the other variables was then assessed. RESULTS: Mean change in height velocity was similar among the three groups, with a maximum difference among the groups of 0.6 cm/yr. There was a small but statistically significant correlation (r=-0.12) between the stimulated GH and first year height velocity. CONCLUSIONS: The small correlation between first year growth response and peak GH is not clinically relevant in defining GH resistance. No cut off level by peak GH could be determined to enhance the usefulness of this measure to predict response. Baseline age was the only clinically significant predictor, R-squared, 6.4%. All other variables contributed less than an additional 2% to the R-squared.

Long-term safety of recombinant human growth hormone in turner syndrome.

CONTEXT: Turner syndrome (TS) affects more than 50,000 girls and women in the United States. The National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS) has collected efficacy and safety data for 5220 TS children treated with recombinant human GH (rhGH) during the last 20 yr. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine frequencies of specific targeted adverse events (AEs) and additional AEs of interest in TS patients. Corresponding safety data in non-TS patients or normal populations were compared for selected AEs. METHODS: Patients may be enrolled at rhGH initiation and followed until discontinuation. Investigators submit AE reports describing any event that is potentially rhGH related or is a targeted event. RESULTS: The Genentech Drug Safety department received 442 AE reports for TS NCGS patients as of June 30, 2006, including 117 serious AEs. Seven deaths occurred; five resulted from aortic dissections/ruptures. The incidence of certain events known to be associated with rhGH (targeted events), including intracranial hypertension, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, scoliosis, and pancreatitis, was increased compared with other non-TS patients in NCGS. There were 10 new-onset malignancies that occurred, including six in patients without known risk factors. Type 1 diabetes also appeared to be increased compared with other NCGS groups. CONCLUSIONS: Children with TS who were treated with rhGH exhibit an increased underlying risk for selected AEs associated with rhGH and for type 1 diabetes, which is likely unrelated to rhGH. The aortic dissection/rupture incidence reflects the higher baseline risk for these events in TS, was consistent with current epidemiological data in smaller TS populations, and is likely unrelated to rhGH. It is not known whether the reported malignancies represent an inherently increased risk in TS patients. Twenty years of experience in 5220 patients indicates no new rhGH-related safety signals in the TS population. The NCGS and similar registries, although focused on the years during rhGH treatment, may also be a window into the natural history of TS in childhood.

Height velocity targets from the national cooperative growth study for first-year growth hormone responses in short children.

CONTEXT: Although GH has been used to treat short stature in GH deficiency (GHD) and other conditions for more than 40 yr, criteria for satisfactorily defining targets for GH responsiveness have never been developed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to present the first-year growth expressed as height velocity (HV) for prepubertal boys and girls with idiopathic GHD, organic GHD, idiopathic short stature, or Turner syndrome from Genentech's National Cooperative Growth Study to derive age-specific targets for GH responsiveness for each etiology and gender. DESIGN AND POPULATION: Using data from the National Cooperative Growth Study, we constructed curves of response to GH during the first year of treatment with standard daily doses in naive-to-treatment prepubertal children with idiopathic GHD (2323 males, 842 females), organic GHD (582 males, 387 females), idiopathic short stature (1392 males, 465 females), or Turner syndrome (1367 females). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: For each category, mean pretreatment and mean +/-1 and +/-2 sd for the first-year HV on GH were assessed. Mean and mean +/- 1 sd for HV were plotted vs. age at baseline (initiation of GH treatment) and compared with mean pretreatment HV. RESULTS: HV plots for each category as a factor of age at baseline are presented. Mean - 2 sd HV plots approximated the pretreatment HV. CONCLUSION: Using baseline age- and gender-specific targets will assist clinicians in assessing a patient's first-year growth response. We propose that HV below the mean - 1 sd on these plots be considered a "poor" response. These curves may be used to identify patients who may benefit from GH dose adjustment, to assess compliance issues, or to challenge the original diagnosis.

Efficacy of a long-acting growth hormone (GH) preparation in patients with adult GH deficiency.

CONTEXT: Treatment of adult GH deficiency (AGHD) with daily injections of GH results in decreased adipose mass, increased lean body mass (LBM), increased bone mineral density, and improved quality of life. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to determine whether a depot preparation of GH given every 14 d would lead to comparable decreases in trunk adipose tissue as daily GH. DESIGN: This open-label, randomized study compares subjects receiving depot GH, daily GH, or no therapy. SETTING: The study was performed at 23 university or local referral endocrine centers. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-five adults with AGHD syndrome participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomized to receive depot GH (n = 51), daily GH (n = 53), or no treatment (n = 31) for 32 wk. The dose of GH was titrated so that IGF-I was less than or equal to +2 SD of the age-adjusted normal range. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Trunk adipose tissue was the main outcome measure as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The percentage of the trunk region that is fat increased by 0.4 in the no treatment group, but decreased by 3.2 (P = 0.001 vs. untreated) in the GH depot group and by 2.5 (P < 0.004 vs. untreated) in the daily GH group. Visceral adipose tissue area decreased by 9.1% in the GH depot group and by 6.8% in the daily GH group. LBM and high-density lipoprotein increased in both treatment groups. Side effect profiles were similar. Three subjects receiving GH experienced serious episodes of adrenal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: GH diminishes trunk and visceral adipose tissue and increases LBM in AGHD. A depot form of GH that is administered every 14 d is as safe and effective as daily GH injections.

Efficacy and safety results of long-term growth hormone treatment of idiopathic short stature.

CONTEXT: Small clinical trials of GH treatment of idiopathic short stature (ISS) show variable efficacy. OBJECTIVE: The study was an analysis of a large GH registry for efficacy and safety of GH treatment of ISS. There was also a comparison with a specific clinical trial. DESIGN: Up to 7 yr of GH treatment of ISS was evaluated for efficacy and safety in the National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS). SETTING: The NCGS study was conducted at Genentech, Inc. and included 47,226 patients. PATIENTS: The ISS group included maximum stimulated GH 10 ng/ml or more and/or a report of ISS by investigator (n = 8018; all included for safety). Cohort 1 (n = 2520) was similar to the clinical trial, cohort 2 (n = 283) included subjects younger than 5 yr of age, and cohort 3 (n = 940) was pubertal at GH start. INTERVENTION: GH, approximately 0.30 mg/kg.wk, was given. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These included growth velocities and height sd (HtSDS). RESULTS: Mean first-year growth velocities in cohorts 1, 2, and 3 increased 4.6, 3.9, and 4.4 cm/yr over pretreatment, respectively. Measures included: baseline mean HtSDS, -2.9, -3.2, and -2.8; mean HtSDS at 1 yr, -2.4, -2.3, and -2.3, respectively. Mean HtSDS after 7 yr in cohorts 1 (n = 303) and 2 (n = 85) and 5 yr in cohort 3 (n = 58) were: -1.2, -1.0, and -1.5, respectively. Cohort 3 shorter treatment time was due to advanced baseline age (mean 13.8 yr) and puberty. Mean HtSDS gain in cohort 1 was comparable with the clinical trial. No new safety signals specific to the NCGS ISS population were observed. CONCLUSION: ISS patients in the GH registry demonstrate a significant increase in HtSDS with the safety profile similar to GH-deficient patients. RESULTS were similar to the clinical trial.

Limited efficacy of growth hormone (GH) during transition of GH-deficient patients from adolescence to adulthood: a phase III multicenter, double-blind, randomized two-year trial.

CONTEXT: Treatment of GH-deficient adolescents in transition to adulthood remains challenging. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of GH in GH-deficient adolescents in transition. PATIENTS: Fifty-eight GH-deficient adolescents (mean age, 15.8 +/- 1.8 yr; 33 males) at near completion of their linear growth participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Baseline studies were done while subjects were on GH. Subjects were retested (insulin-induced hypoglycemia) 4 wk after GH discontinuation and reclassified as persistently GH-deficient or controls (n = 18). GH-deficient subjects were randomized to GH (n = 25, approximately 20 microg/kg.d) or placebo (n = 15). SETTING: The multicenter study was conducted over a 2-yr period. MAIN OUTCOMES: Changes in body composition, bone mineral density (BMD), quality of life (QOL), cardiovascular and metabolic markers were measured. RESULTS: All groups had normal measures of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, body composition, BMD, cardiac function, muscle strength, and QOL at baseline and after 2 yr. IGF-I concentrations decreased in all, but less so in the GH-group (P = 0.013). There was a greater increase in lean body mass (lesser adiposity) in the GH group than placebo at 12 months, but not at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: 1) GH-deficient patients properly treated in childhood can have normal BMD, body composition, cardiac function, muscle strength, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and QOL when reaching adult height; and 2) continuation of GH therapy for 2 yr did not change these measures as compared to placebo-treated or control subjects. GH-deficient adolescents in good metabolic status at the time of epiphyseal fusion may safely discontinue GH for at least 2 yr. Follow-up is needed to determine whether GH therapy is eventually warranted in subjects treated with GH during childhood.