Erratum to "Hand Surgery Patient Perspectives on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of Over 600 Patients" [Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online 5 (2023) 102-107].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.02.009.].

Hand Surgery Patient Perspectives on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of Over 600 Patients.

Purpose: Medical cannabis (MC) has been proposed as a potential addition to multimodal pain management regimens in orthopedics. This study evaluates hand and upper-extremity patient perspectives of MC as a treatment for common orthopedic and musculoskeletal pain conditions. This study also aims to identify the proportion of patients already using MC, perceived barriers to MC use, and opinions on insurance coverage and legality of cannabis. Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional survey study was conducted of all patients at least 18 years old presenting from October 2020 to January 2021 to a hand and upper-extremity outpatient clinic. The survey collected information regarding opinion on MC, including use, legality, and willingness to use MC in the future. Medical cannabis was legal in the states where the study was conducted. Results: A total of 679 patients completed the survey (response rate 72.5%). Sixty-eight patients (10.0%) reported currently using MC. Of the 623 patients (90.0%) who reported not currently using MC, 504 (80.9%) would consider using MC for chronic pain, while the remaining 119 (19.1%) would not consider the use of MC for chronic pain. Age was not associated with whether a patient would consider using MC (P = .16) or was already using MC (P = .10). The most identified barrier to MC use was cost, reported as either expensive or not affordable by 477 patients (70.5%). Conclusions: This study found that most patients presenting for hand and upper-extremity complaints would consider using MC (80.9%), and most perceive it as a safe treatment option for common orthopedic conditions. Moreover, 10% of patients reported already using MC. One of the major barriers to MC use is the cost. Most (90.9%) patients support policies for legalization and insurance coverage of MC. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

Thumb-Basal Joint Arthroplasty Outcomes and Metacarpal Subsidence: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Trapeziectomy With Suture Button Suspensionplasty Versus Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition.

BACKGROUND: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure in the surgical management of symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. Following trapeziectomy, a number of suspensionplasty techniques are often used, but limited comparative evidence exists between these techniques. The central aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of 2 suspensionplasty techniques following trapeziectomy: suture button (TightRope) versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). METHODS: Prospective data were collected on 112 consecutive patients with Eaton stage III-IV thumb CMC arthritis who underwent open trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. There were 53 LRTI and 59 TightRope suspensionplasty procedures. Outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic analysis, and lateral pinch strength. Patient demographic data and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Patients undergoing TightRope suspensionplasty had significantly higher trapeziometacarpal index and thus less subsidence than the LRTI group at 2 weeks (0.22 vs 0.17 [P < .0001]) and 3 months (0.17 vs 0.15 [P < .05]) postoperatively. TightRope suspensionplasty also had a significantly lower QuickDASH score at 2 weeks (64.7 vs 74.6 [P < .05]), 3 months (20.7 vs 32.5 [P < .05]), and 1 year postoperatively (7.57 vs 21.5 [P < .05]) compared with the LRTI group. However, there was no difference in VAS pain, lateral pinch strength, reoperation, or complications at any time point between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Thumb CMC joint arthroplasty performed with a TightRope suspensionplasty versus LRTI yielded short-term improved resistance to subsidence, long-term greater improvement in clinical outcome by QuickDASH, and no difference in pain or complication rates.

Optimal Position of the Bone Anchor for the Internal Brace Suspensionplasty Technique for Thumb Basal Joint Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition is a common technique for thumb basal joint arthroplasty. Recently, a variation of this technique, a suture suspensionplasty, has been introduced. The goal of our study was to assess the optimal position of the bone anchor in the thumb metacarpal. We hypothesized that an anchor placed in the radial aspect of the thumb metacarpal base would provide improved stability and resist subsidence more effectively than an ulnar-based thumb anchor. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaver arms were imaged fluoroscopically in anteroposterior and lateral views centered over the thumb carpometacarpal joint before and after trapeziectomy and after the placement of radial-based and ulnar-based bone anchors. The intermetacarpal angle between the thumb and index metacarpals was measured on all images after the application of a standard force. Radial abduction, opposition, subsidence, palmar abduction, and adduction were measured. Subsidence was calculated as the percentage loss of the trapezial space. RESULTS: Both radially and ulnarly placed internal brace constructs allowed more radial abduction, opposition, and palmar abduction than the pretrapeziectomy constructs. They both also reduced subsidence by approximately 20% to 29% compared with the posttrapeziectomy constructs. Comparing radial to ulnar constructs, motion and subsidence were similar. CONCLUSIONS: There was immediate stability of the thumb with respect to axial load and subsidence after anchor placement, and this was independent of the anchor position. The position of the bone anchor in the thumb metacarpal base did not affect the range of motion. Although the device can limit subsidence, it does not appear to restrict any range of motion of the thumb, irrespective of anchor position. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This cadaver study can help hand surgeons understand the effect of positioning of bone anchors when performing a specific suture suspensionplasty technique.

Perspectives of Orthopedic Patients on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of More Than 2500 Patients.

Nationwide perspectives on cannabis have changed dramatically over recent decades. Although cannabis remains illegal at the federal level, medical cannabis (MC) is now legal in most states, and research has continued to show its effectiveness in a variety of medical conditions. However, both perception and acceptance of MC by the general public are evolving and remain poorly understood. Treating patients effectively with these novel therapeutics requires an understanding of the complex interplay of social and legal factors that could affect patient use. This cross-sectional survey study of more than 2500 patients sought to assess current patient perspectives on MC and to investigate factors related to its use that may represent barriers to broader patient use. Most respondents would consider using MC for chronic pain or other medical conditions. Most respondents were aware of the legal status of MC in their state, and 9 of 10 respondents believed that MC should be legal throughout the United States. General public knowledge of the utility of MC is an area needing improvement because older patients were significantly less likely to believe that MC is safe to use or that MC is safer than prescription opioids. As has been reported in previous literature, social stigma and cost appear to remain barriers for patient use of MC. Our findings provide further insight into current patient perspectives on MC, aiding both medical providers and researchers as we continue to provide access to and research MC. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):e309-e314.].

Comparative Cost Analysis of Single-use Sterile versus Reprocessed Distal Radius Volar Plate Sets.

Background: With the rise in distal radius fracture (DRF) incidence and treatment through open reduction internal fixation, there are increasing concerns in the current medical cost containment climate. To help reduce costs, manufacturers are introducing sterile packed kits. The purpose of this study is to compare the costs of the single use kit (SK) against conventional reprocessed DRF surgical sets (RS). Methods: A four-year retrospective review at three surgical centers was performed to determine a company's RS average sterilization and processing costs. RS instrumentation cost was estimated by straight-line depreciation from the original purchase price. RS implant costs were calculated from the list price. SK list cost was obtained from the same company. Incidence of surgical delays was estimated by a survey of 23 hand surgeons and cost of delays was obtained from surgical center reports. Sensitivity analysis on delay frequency was performed to assess a range of overall costs. Results: OR delays were estimated at one out of 100 cases, with an average cost of $11 per case. For RS, average instruments, implants, and sterilization costs per case was $47, $2882, and $39. The total RS cost of $2,978 and the SK was $1,667 with a difference of $1,313 per case. Conclusion: RS was found to cost $1,313 more per case than the SK in an ambulatory surgical setting and potentially more cost effective. Ultimately, pricing is highly variable at each center based on negotiated and contractual pricing.

Optimal Position of the Suture Button Suspensionplasty (TightRope) for Thumb Basal Joint Arthritis.

Background: Surgical treatment of basal joint arthritis commonly consists of trapeziectomy followed by various suspensionplasty techniques to provide stability to the thumb ray. Our study goal was to assess the motion and stability of the thumb ray after trapeziectomy and placement of a suture button (Mini TightRope®, Arthrex, Naples, Florida) in a high- or low-angle trajectory. We hypothesized that a low-angle trajectory would yield the greatest stability while providing maximal motion of the thumb. Methods: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver arms were imaged fluoroscopically in anterior-posterior and lateral views before and after trapeziectomy, and after placement of low- and high-angle suture buttons. The intermetacarpal angle between the thumb and index metacarpals was measured after application of a standard force. Radial abduction, opposition, subsidence, palmar abduction, adduction, and subsidence were measured. Results: Compared to posttrapeziectomy constructs, low- and high-angle TightRope constructs demonstrated less subsidence, low-angle TightRopes had less palmar abduction, and high-angle TightRope constructs had less radial abduction and adduction. High-angle TightRopes allowed more palmar abduction than low-angle constructs. The high-angle TightRopes trended toward more subsidence than low-angle constructs, although it was not significant. Conclusions: Both TightRope constructs provided improved axial stability after trapeziectomy while not excessively limiting any one motion of the thumb. Compared to the high-angle trajectory, the low-angle TightRope placement provided a more stable construct with respect to subsidence and angular motion. Given the concern for excessive motion of the first metacarpal base with the high-angle construct, we recommend a low-angle trajectory TightRope placement.

Radiographic Incidence and Functional Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures Undergoing Volar Plate Fixation With Concomitant Scapholunate Widening: A Prospective Analysis.

Background: Scapholunate (SL) ligament injuries can occur concomitantly with distal radius fractures (DRFs), and the management of acute SL injury in the setting of DRFs remains controversial. The purpose of the study is to identify the radiographic incidence of SL widening in DRF treated with volar plate fixation and to determine the functional outcomes of DRF with concomitant radiographic SL-widening. Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients with DRFs, with and without radiographic SL-widening, and treated with volar locked plating, were prospectively enrolled. No SL ligament repairs or reconstructions were performed in any cases. Patients with DRFs with radiographic criteria for SL widening were compared to those without. Patients were evaluated at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively with Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires. Results: Thirty-one patients (26.5%) were found to have radiographic evidence of SL widening. Patients with concomitant SL widening had less wrist extension at 3 months (52.4 degrees vs 60.8, P = .034) and at 1 year (64.5 degrees vs 71.8, P = .023). The group with SL widening had greater articular step off at 3 months (0.33 vs 0.06, P = .042), but no difference at 1 year (0.11 vs 0.05, P = .348). There were no differences in wrist flexion, supination, pronation, volar tilt, radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance, PRWE scores, and Quick Dash scores at 3 months and 1 year. Conclusions: Radiographic SL-widening is a common finding associated with DRFs undergoing surgical repair. There are similar clinical outcomes between those with untreated SL widening compared to those without an SL widening at 1-year postoperatively.

Orthopedic Specialty Hospitals Are Associated With Lower Rates of Deep Surgical Site Infection Compared With Tertiary Medical Centers.

Orthopedic specialty hospitals may allow for more streamlined and efficient care, resulting in shorter lengths of stay, lower costs, and fewer complications. Surgical site infection can be a devastating complication of orthopedic procedures and is difficult to treat successfully, requiring substantial cost and resources. The goal of this study was to determine whether specialty hospitals had lower rates of infection than tertiary care institutions. Records were reviewed for patients undergoing primary total hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty and single-level lumbar fusion from 2010 to 2017 at 2 academic tertiary hospitals and 2 specialty hospitals. Patient demographic information, comorbidities, and the development of deep surgical site infection within 1 year of the index procedure were recorded and compared between the groups. Multivariate analysis identified variables that significantly correlated with infection rates. A total of 20,264 patients (73.9%) underwent surgery at a tertiary hospital, and 7169 (26.1%) underwent a procedure at a specialty hospital. Patients treated at orthopedic specialty hospitals had lower rates of infection at 1 year (0.6% vs 0.2%, P<.0001). Of the infections, 42 (32.3%) occurred in the knee, 50 (38.5%) in the hip, 24 (18.5%) in the spine, and 12 (10.8%) in the shoulder. When controlling for a healthier patient population, procedures performed at specialty hospitals were an independent predictor of infection within 1 year (odds ratio, 0.3693; P=.0012). Although tertiary hospitals care for older patients with more medical comorbidities, patients undergoing orthopedic procedures at a specialty hospital may be at lower risk for infection. Further study is needed to identify the processes associated with reduced infection rates and to determine whether they can be adopted at tertiary centers. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e521-e526.].

Radiographic Healing and Functional Outcomes of Untreated Ulnar Styloid Fractures Following Volar Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Analysis.

Background: Ulnar styloid fractures (USFs) are common concomitant injuries associated with distal radius fractures (DRFs). Recent studies have found conflicting evidence on whether these fractures treated or untreated effect pain and functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate pain and function outcomes of consecutively untreated USFs in surgically repaired DRFs. The study hypothesis was that there would be no difference in outcomes whether an USF is present or not, with all cases left untreated. Methods: A prospective study at a single institution of consecutive DRF treated surgically with volar locked plating was undertaken. No patients underwent fixation of an USF if present. There were no treated USF that were excluded. Patients with associated ulnar neck and shaft fractures were excluded. Functional outcome measures were analyzed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (QDASH) and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores. Outcome measures were collected at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Results: There was an incidence of 52.2% (n = 70/134) USF associated with surgically treated DRF. By location, there were 52.9% (n = 37/70) ulnar styloid tip fractures and 46.1% (33/70) ulnar styloid base. There were 75.7% of USF (53/70) still not healed by 1-year follow-up. When comparing patients with a DRF without an USF versus DRF with an associated USF at 12 months, there was no statistical difference in the QDASH score (6.7 vs 8.4, P = .47) or the PRWE total score (4.8 vs 7.5, P = .24). Similarly, subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference in QDASH or PRWE scores at final follow-up in united USF versus nonunited USF subjects (QDASH 14.2 vs 6.8, P = .112; PRWE 14.8 vs 5.4, P = .185). Conclusions: USFs are a common concomitant injury occurring in nearly half of DRFs treated surgically. Our prospective cohort analysis showed that neither the presence, type, nor bony union status of a concomitant USF has any significant effect on patient outcomes or reoperations at 1-year postoperatively. Our study confirms our hypothesis that USF of the tip and base should be left untreated.

Predictive Factors for Return to Driving following Volar Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fracture.

Background A common query by patients undergoing distal radius fracture (DRF) repair is when (s)he can resume driving postoperatively. A prospective cohort analysis was performed to assess fracture and patient factors on a patient's self-reported ability to return to driving to better inform patients and surgeons. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing DRF repair with locking volar plate were enrolled. Preoperative demographic and radiographic characteristics, and postoperative time to return to driving were collected. Data collected included age, sex, hand dominance, body mass index (BMI), level of education, concomitant ulnar fracture, fracture setting prior to surgery, and AO fracture classification. Results A total of 131 patients were enrolled (108 women, 23 men) with 36 AO type A, 22 AO type B, and 73 AO type C DRFs, with an average age of 59.5 years. Fracture severity by classification did not significantly affect time to return to driving. However, BMI, sex, and age were found to significantly affect time to return to driving. Patients aged 19 to 59 years, 60 to 75 years, and over 75 years returned to driving 13.1, 15.4, and 30.1 days following surgery, respectively ( p < 0.01). Classified by BMI, patients that were normal weight, overweight, and obese returned to driving 11.5, 13.1, and 21.0 days following surgery, respectively ( p < 0.05). Men returned to driving 8.8 days and women 17.3 days postoperatively ( p = 0.001). Conclusion Patients severity of fracture as determined by AO fracture type did not affect time to driving, while increased BMI, female sex, and increased age were found to be significant factors in patients' return to driving time after distal radius fracture repair. Level of Evidence This is a Level II, prospective cohort study.

Splinting after Distal Radius Fracture Fixation: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Postoperative Plaster Splint versus Soft Dressing.

Background The effect of postoperative dressing and splinting after distal radius fracture (DRF) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is not well understood. A prospective cohort analysis was performed to assess differences in functional and radiographic outcomes with the use of plaster splinting or soft dressing following DRF ORIF. Methods All patients undergoing DRF ORIF with locking volar plates were consecutively enrolled. Preoperative demographic and postoperative radiographic and functional outcome data were collected at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Functional data included range of motion (ROM), pain on visual analog scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Radiographic data included loss of fracture reduction. Results A total of 139 patients were enrolled (79 plaster splinting, 60 soft dressing). By the first postoperative visit (POV), there was one case of loss of reduction with plaster splinting and one case with soft dressing with no hardware failure or revision surgery in either group, and no difference in DASH, PRWE, or VAS pain scores. By the final POV, the soft dressing group showed greater ROM in extension by 9.6, flexion by 10.9, and supination by 4.8 degrees over plaster splinting. Additionally, the soft dressing group demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PRWE and DASH scores, as well as VAS pain scores as compared with plaster splinting. Conclusions Applying only soft dressing following DRF ORIF demonstrated improvements in ROM, VAS, and functional outcomes by final follow-up, with no significant differences in radiographic outcomes. No benefit of applying a plaster splint was identified.

Prospective evaluation of sleep improvement after cubital tunnel decompression surgery.

BACKGROUND: Compromised sleep is a known phenomenon with compressive neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome. However, the prevalence of sleep disturbance with cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) and the effect on sleep after ulnar nerve decompression are not well understood. We hypothesized that CuTS results in sleep disturbances and that decompression surgery would result in improvement in overall sleep quality. METHODS: Consecutive patients with electrodiagnostic-proven CuTS indicated for decompression were prospectively enrolled. Demographic data, McGowan grade, electrodiagnostic (electromyography) severity, visual analog scale pain score, the 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, and the Insomnia Severity Index scale data were collected preoperatively and at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 145 patients enrolled, with 97% available at 2 weeks and 72% available at the final 3-month follow-up. Surgical decompression procedures consisted of 102 in situ releases and 43 transpositions. The average preoperative Insomnia Severity Index score for the entire cohort was 10.7, above the threshold for a diagnosis of insomnia, which subsequently improved to 4.1 by final follow-up postoperatively, consistent with resolution of the insomnia. There was no difference in the extent of sleep improvement between in situ decompression and transposition. Similarly, electromyography severity and McGowan grade also did not appear to significantly affect the extent of sleep improvement. CONCLUSION: CuTS decompression surgery, irrespective of surgical type and preoperative severity, resulted in improvement in sleep by the 3 month postoperative visit.

Patient Satisfaction in the Preoperative Period: Preparing for Hand Surgery.

Background: The potential impact of the number and type of preoperative encounters on satisfaction rates prior to elective surgical procedures is unclear, specifically scheduling and medical clearance encounters. Methods: Questionnaires investigating satisfaction with the preoperative process were collected for 200 patients presenting for elective hand surgery. The number of telephone, surgeon, and medical clearance encounters were recorded, and satisfaction was determined for each type based on a 4-category Likert scale. All patients 18 years or older were included, while only patients providing incomplete questionnaires were excluded. Outcome data were assessed for associations between different encounter totals or types and satisfaction rates. Results: Among 200 patients, 197 completed the questionnaire and were included. Overall satisfaction with the preoperative process was 92.9%, with only 3% of patients dissatisfied. There was a significant association between satisfaction and the number of telephone and total encounters. Satisfaction fell below 90% after 4 or more telephone calls (66.6%, P = 0.005) and 5 or more total encounters (80%, P = 0.008). When considered individually, there was no significant association between satisfaction and the number of surgeon (P = 0.267) or medical office encounters (P = 0.087), or a patient's perceived health status (P = 0.14). Conclusions: Greater than 3 telephone or 4 total encounters significantly decreases patient satisfaction, while surgeon and medical office visits are not associated with satisfaction rates when considered individually. This suggests the number, not the type, of preoperative encounters impact satisfaction and highlight the importance of efficient communication between patients and providers.

Prospective Evaluation of Opioid Consumption Following Cubital Tunnel Decompression Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Managing postoperative pain is important for patients and surgeons. However, there is concern over opioid dependency. Cubital tunnel decompression is among the most common upper extremity surgeries. Our study aimed to analyze opioid use after cubital tunnel decompression to guide postoperative opioid prescribing. METHODS: We prospectively collected opioid consumption for 16 consecutive months (February 2016 to June 2017) for cubital tunnel decompression patients. Data on demographics, insurance type, surgery performed, functional questionnaires (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [QuickDASH]), and electrodiagnostics (electromyography) were collected. Opioid consumption was reported at first postoperative visits. RESULTS: One hundred patients consumed a mean of 50 morphine equivalent units (MEUs) (range, 0-300), or 7 oxycodone 5-mg pills, postoperatively. Cubital tunnel release (CuTR) patients consumed fewer than ulnar nerve transposition (UNT) patients (40.4 vs 62.5 MEUs or 5.4 vs 8.3 pills, P = .08). Patients undergoing submuscular UNT consumed more than CuTR (115.0 vs 40.4 MEUs or 15.3 vs 5.4 pills, p = 0.003) and more than subcutaneous UNT patients (37.8 MEU or 5.0 pills, p = 0.03). Medicare patients consumed less than privately insured (42.7 vs 54.1 MEUs, 5.7 vs 7.2 pills, P = .02) and less than workers' compensation patients (76.8 MEU or 10.2 pills, P = .04). Older patients consumed fewer than younger patients ( P = .03). Postoperative QuickDASH score was positively related to opioid intake ( P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Patients consumed 7 oxycodone 5-mg pills after cubital tunnel decompression. Younger, privately insured, and workers' compensation patients, and those with worse functional scores and those undergoing UNT (specifically the submuscular technique) consumed more opioids.

Changes in Medicare Reimbursement for Advanced Upper Extremity Imaging.

PURPOSE: Advanced noninvasive imaging of the upper extremity joints, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US) , has numerous applications in the evaluation of musculoskeletal pathology. Choice of modality is influenced by clinical and cost concerns, with US and CT traditionally considered less expensive than MRI. We analyzed the changes in Medicare reimbursement for these imaging modalities with the hypothesis that recent reimbursement decreases in MRI have made this modality more cost-competitive than other commonly used imaging modalities. METHODS: Using the Medicare Fee Schedule Database, we reviewed the Medicare reimbursements fee schedule for CT, US, and MRI from 2000 to 2015 at the national, regional, and state levels. Charges were identified and queried by Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for each modality. Changes in reimbursement were calculated for each of the modalities. RESULTS: Total (technical and professional) reimbursement for MRI decreased from $516.93 to $237.16 between 2007 and 2015. Adjusted for inflation, this represents a 60% decrease in reimbursement. During the same time period, total (technical and professional) reimbursement for CT decreased from $256.95 to $180.03, a 39% decrease adjusted for inflation. Total (technical and professional) reimbursement for US increased over the same time period, from $98.91 to $118.22 in 2015, in conjunction with changes in the CPT coding for US. Total (technical and professional) MRI reimbursement decreased from 5.23 times the reimbursement of US in 2007 to 2.01 times in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: In concordance with our hypothesis, these findings demonstrate that upper extremity MRI and CT reimbursements as scheduled by Medicare have declined significantly in recent years and that these modalities are approaching financial parity with wrist US. In spite of these decreases, MRI remains the most costly advanced imaging modality. Depending on each clinical scenario, the added cost may be justified by the value added by the type of information that can be garnered from each study. Cost-analysis studies evaluating the clinical application of MRI performed prior to the reimbursement decline should be evaluated with caution, and cost-benefit analyses based on these data are at risk of being out-of-date. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Analysis IV.

Economic Analysis of the Cost of Implants Used for Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: There are a number of different implant choices for surgical treatment of distal radius fractures, often determined by surgeon preference or availability. Although no one volar plate demonstrates superior outcomes, there are significant cost differences absorbed by hospitals and surgical centers. This purpose of this study is to characterize the economic implications of implant selection in the surgical management of distal radius fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review of billing records at a mid-size community surgicenter was conducted for CPT codes 25607, 25608, and 25609 between 1/1/2014 and 6/1/2014, and associated implant costs and facility reimbursements were collected. A unique stochastic simulation model was developed from derived probabilities, reimbursements, and costs, and analyzed by Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Reimbursement to the facility for distal radius ORIF cases ranged from $1,102.20 to $7,393.86, with an average of $3,824.56. Per case operating costs to the facility ranged from $1,250 to $7,270, with an average of $2,817.42. In the US, variations in implant cost 25% above or below the mean translates to annual operating profits realized by facilities ranging from a loss of $57,047,720 to profits of $55,189,729. On average, per case operating costs for distal radius fractures need to be less than $2956 for facilities to realize a per case profit. CONCLUSION: Value based purchasing is by necessity becoming integrated into clinical decision making by orthopaedic surgeons. Variations of 25% around the mean per case operating cost can vary facility operating margins by $112,237,450 annually. Arming the orthopaedic surgeon with the realities of the cost of implant selection in the operative management of distal radius fractures will lead to better value based decision making, substantial cost savings to the US hospital system, and ultimately payers and patients.

A Cost Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Performed Wide Awake versus under Sedation.

BACKGROUND: Hand surgery under local anesthesia only has been used more frequently in recent years. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative time and cost for carpal tunnel release performed under local anesthesia ("wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet," or WALANT) only to carpal tunnel release performed under intravenous sedation. METHODS: A retrospective comparison of intraoperative (operating room) surgical time and postoperative (postanesthesia care unit) time for consecutive carpal tunnel release procedures performed under both intravenous sedation and wide-awake local anesthesia was undertaken. All operations were performed by the same surgeon using the same mini-open surgical technique. A cost analysis was performed by means of standardized anesthesia billing based on base units, time, and conversion rates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of total operative time, 28 minutes in the intravenous sedation group versus 26 minutes in the wide-awake local anesthesia group. Postanesthesia care unit times were significantly longer in the intravenous sedation group (84 minutes) compared to the wide-awake local anesthesia group (7 minutes). Depending on conversion rates used, a total of $139 to $432 was saved in each case performed with wide-awake local anesthesia by not using anesthesia services. In addition, a range of $1320 to $1613 was saved for the full episode of care, including anesthesia costs, operating room time, and postanesthesia care unit time for each patient undergoing wide-awake local anesthesia carpal tunnel release. CONCLUSION: Carpal tunnel release surgery performed with the wide-awake local anesthesia technique offers significant reduction in cost for use of anesthesia and postanesthesia care unit resources.

Identifying and treating traumatic hand and wrist injuries.

Proper identification and management of traumatic hand and wrist injuries is critical to preventing loss of function, nerve damage, joint instability, persistent pain, and delay in indicated surgery. This article uses case studies to help clinicians make accurate diagnoses and treatment plans. Physical examination findings, radiograph results, and treatment plans are reviewed for four traumatic hand and wrist fractures or dislocations.

Thumb Basal Joint Arthroplasty: Prospective Comparison of Perioperative Analgesia and Opioid Consumption.

Trapeziectomy alone or in combination with a suspensionplasty technique is a common surgical treatment for symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. The authors undertook a prospective comparative study to test the hypothesis that peripheral nerve blocks would provide better pain control than local anesthesia with bupivacaine or liposomal bupivacaine regarding pain scores and opioid pill consumption. Patients who elected to undergo basal joint arthroplasty were allocated to 1 of 3 postoperative pain management groups: (1) peripheral nerve block, (2) local anesthesia with bupivacaine, or (3) local anesthesia with liposomal bupivacaine. Total opioid pill consumption and visual analog scale pain scores were reported for the first 5 postoperative days (PODs). Seventy-eight patients were enrolled, with 27, 23, and 28 patients in the peripheral nerve block, bupivacaine, and liposomal bupivacaine groups, respectively. All groups experienced an increase in opioid pill consumption and visual analog scale pain scores from POD 0 to POD 1. Postoperative visual analog scale pain scores were lowest in group 3 from POD 0 to POD 2. Average visual analog scale pain scores were highest in group 1, except for on POD 0. After POD 2, visual analog scale pain scores normalized between all groups and decreased uniformly thereafter. Total opioid consumption was lowest in group 3 (average, 11 pills) compared with group 1 (average, 17 pills) and group 2 (average, 19 pills). Overall, these findings did not support the authors' hypothesis that peripheral nerve blocks are superior in terms of postoperative pain control and opioid consumption. Although there were advantages regarding opioid consumption and pain control with liposomal bupivacaine, these were limited to the first POD. The effectiveness of each modality, as well as potential risks and costs, should be considered when determining the optimal strategy. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(3):e410-e415.].