Long-Term Toxicity and Health-Related Quality of Life After Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy or Radiation Therapy Alone for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer in the Randomized PORTEC-3 Trial.

PURPOSE: The survival results of the PORTEC-3 trial showed a significant improvement in both overall and failure-free survival with chemoradiation therapy versus pelvic radiation therapy alone. The present analysis was performed to compare long-term adverse events (AE) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the study, 660 women with high-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to receive chemoradiation therapy (2 concurrent cycles of cisplatin followed by 4 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel) or radiation therapy alone. Toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. HRQOL was measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 and CX24/OV28 subscales and compared with normative data. An as-treated analysis was performed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 74.6 months; 574 (87%) patients were evaluable for HRQOL. At 5 years, grade ≥2 AE were scored for 78 (38%) patients who had received chemoradiation therapy versus 46 (24%) who had received radiation therapy alone (P = .008). Grade 3 AE did not differ significantly between the groups (8% vs 5%, P = .18) at 5 years, and only one new late grade 4 toxicity had been reported. At 3 and 5 years, sensory neuropathy toxicity grade ≥2 persisted after chemoradiation therapy in 6% (vs 0% after radiation therapy, P < .001) and more patients reported significant tingling or numbness at HRQOL (27% vs 8%, P < .001 at 3 years; 24% vs 9%, P = .002 at 5 years). Up to 3 years, more patients who had chemoradiation therapy reported limb weakness (21% vs 5%, P < .001) and lower physical (79 vs 87, P < .001) and role functioning (78 vs 88, P < .001) scores. Both treatment groups reported similar long-term global health/quality of life scores, which were better than those of the normative population. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a long-lasting, clinically relevant, negative impact of chemoradiation therapy on toxicity and HRQOL, most importantly persistent peripheral sensory neuropathy. Physical and role functioning impairments were seen until 3 years. These long-term data are essential for patient information and shared decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer.

Multicenter, randomised, open-label, non-comparative phase 2 trial on the efficacy and safety of the combination of bevacizumab and trabectedin with or without carboplatin in women with partially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Trabectedin, in addition to its antiproliferative effect, can modify the tumour microenvironment and this could be synergistic with bevacizumab. The efficacy and safety of trabectedin and bevacizumab ± carboplatin have never been investigated. METHODS: In this phase 2 study, women progressing between 6 and 12 months since their last platinum-based therapy were randomised to Arm BT: bevacizumab, trabectedin every 21 days, or Arm BT+C: bevacizumab, trabectedin and carboplatin every 28 days, from cycles 1 to 6, then trabectedin and bevacizumab as in Arm BT. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival rate (PFS-6) and severe toxicity rate (ST-6) at 6 months, assuming a PFS-6 ≤35% for BT and ≤40% for BT+C as not of therapeutic interest and, for both arms, a ST-6 ≥ 30% as unacceptable. RESULTS: BT+C (21 patients) did not meet the safety criteria for the second stage (ST-6 45%; 95%CI: 23%-69%) but PFS-6 was 85% (95%CI: 62%-97%). BT (50 patients) had 75% PFS-6 (95%CI: 60%-87%) and 16% ST-6 (95%CI 7%-30%). CONCLUSIONS: BT compared favourably with other platinum- and non-platinum-based regimens. The combination with carboplatin needs to be assessed further in a re-modulated safer schedule to confirm its apparent strong activity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01735071 (Clinicaltrials.gov).

Changes in the management and outcome of central nervous system involvement from ovarian cancer since 1994.

OBJECTIVE: To identify differences in the management and outcome of patients with central nervous system metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: The clinical and pathologic characteristics, treatment, and outcome of 23 patients with brain metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated during 1982-1994 were compared with those of 20 patients treated during 1995-2010 at the same center. RESULTS: No differences were found in terms of primary tumor characteristics, time interval from ovarian cancer diagnosis to brain involvement diagnosis, sites of metastasis, and presence of extracranial disease. The main difference between the 2 groups was the therapeutic approach. During 1982-1994, most patients received radiotherapy only, whereas most patients during 1995-2010 underwent surgical resection followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The duration of survival during 1982-1994 was 5 months, which was significantly shorter than the duration of survival (18 months) during 1995-2010. CONCLUSION: An aggressive multimodal treatment approach might prolong the survival of patients with brain involvement from ovarian cancer.

Phase III study of valspodar (PSC 833) combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin alone in patients with stage IV or suboptimally debulked stage III epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel administered with or without the multidrug resistance modulator valspodar (PSC 833) in untreated patients with advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven hundred sixty-two patients with stage IV or suboptimally debulked stage III ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either valspodar 5 mg/kg every 6 hours for 12 doses, paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2), and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 (PC-PSC; n = 381) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 (PC; n = 381). Time to disease progression (TTP) was the primary end point. Secondary end points were overall survival time (OS), response rate (RR), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 736 days (range, 1 to 2,280 days), the median TTP was 13.2 and 13.5 months in the PC-PSC and PC groups, respectively (P = .67); the median OS was 32 and 28.9 months, respectively (P = .94). The overall RR was higher in the PC group (41.5% v 33.6%; P = .02). Central and peripheral nervous system and GI toxicities were more common in the PC-PSC group. Ataxia occurred in 53.5% and 3.2% of PC-PSC-and PC-treated patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently in the PC-PSC group. More PC-PSC-treated patients discontinued therapy because of adverse events (AEs), experienced serious AEs, and required paclitaxel dose reductions. CONCLUSION: The addition of valspodar to PC did not improve TTP or OS and was more toxic compared with PC in untreated patients with advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer.

Clindamycin-paclitaxel pharmacokinetic interaction in ovarian cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Plasma protein binding is an important factor for many drugs that can influence the tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics. alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein (AGP) is an acute-phase protein that can increase in plasma of patients with several pathological conditions including cancer. Studies performed in cultured cells indicate that paclitaxel cytotoxicity is reduced by adding AGP and the sensitivity to paclitaxel is restored by displacing its binding to AGP with clindamycin, resulting in an increased paclitaxel cell uptake. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether clindamycin modifies paclitaxel pharmacokinetics also in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with advanced ovarian cancer, previously treated with surgery and chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. A pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel was performed in the first three cycles of the consolidation therapy (paclitaxel and carboplatin) in each patient. In these cycles paclitaxel was administered alone and with two different doses (600 and 1,200 mg) of concurrent clindamycin. The sequence of the three treatments was randomly assigned in each patient in order to avoid the same order of treatments. RESULTS: Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were partly modified by the concurrent administration of clindamycin. C (max) and AUC(0-last) of paclitaxel were significantly higher when the drug was given alone than when it was coadministered with 1,200 mg clindamycin. Moreover, AGP concentrations seem to have a small but statistically significant influence on paclitaxel pharmacokinetic, since AUC(0-last) showed a positive significant correlation with AGP plasma concentration when paclitaxel was given alone. The linear relation was lost when paclitaxel was coadministered with 1,200 mg clindamycin. Toxicity was not influenced by the coadministration of clindamycin. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis that clindamycin could affect paclitaxel pharmacokinetics seems to be verified with this study. Nevertheless, changes induced by giving the combination of the two drugs are minimal and thus of questionable clinical relevance.

Differentiation of small adnexal masses based on morphologic characteristics of transvaginal sonographic imaging: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonographic examination of small adnexal masses by simple descriptive sonographic scoring. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter study, 4 teaching hospitals and 2 regional hospitals with homogeneous standard sonographic equipment and operator experience recruited 677 consecutive patients with small adnexal masses of less than 5 cm. Morphologic scoring was obtained for each mass and recorded. The management of the mass was based on local protocols. The minimal requirement was that surgery had to be performed for complex masses scoring 8 or higher, and follow-up of at least 12 months had to be performed and recorded for patients not admitted to surgery. Sonographic results were compared with pathologic reports and follow-up findings. RESULTS: Fifty-two malignant tumors (19 borderline, 15 stage I-II, 15 stage III-IV, 2 tubal carcinomas, and 1 ovarian lymphoma), 243 benign tumors at pathologic examination, and 382 masses defined as benign according to follow-up findings were observed. Malignant tumors had a significantly higher mean +/- SD morphologic score (11.2 +/- 2.7) than benign masses (6.2 +/- 2.5) (P = .001). No difference was observed in the scoring assignment of malignant masses in different centers (P = .56). With a score of 8 or higher, the likelihood ratio was 3.61 (95% confidence interval, 3.09-4.21); sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 76.9%; and positive predictive value, 25.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide evidence that descriptive morphologic scoring may overcome the subjectivity of interpretation of morphologic characteristics in small masses, and, at the same time, it can incorporate criteria to avoid simplistic description of a complex mass.