Stakeholder perspectives on continuous observation in inpatient psychiatric wards.

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Continuous observation is often used in mental health wards to support the safety of service users, where they will be constantly watched by a member of staff. Evidence suggests that continuous observations may be unhelpful and restrictive, but not enough is known about the practice or the best ways to improve it. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This evaluation integrates the perspectives of service users, informal carers and staff to explore current continuous observation experiences and inform future improvements. While previous research highlights the importance of therapeutic engagement, this study additionally emphasizes how the observation procedure could be adapted to individual needs. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Continuous observations could be more beneficial if they are therapeutic, proportional to the level of risk and co-developed with the service user, informal carer and staff. Further training about communication could support staff engagement and the observation process could be formalized to ensure regular collaborative reviews. ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Continuous observation is a frequently used tool to manage high levels of risk on psychiatric wards. However, there is little previous research on its use in practice. AIM: This qualitative service evaluation aims to explore the continuous observation experiences of service users, informal carers and staff in a local NHS Mental Health Trust, informing suggested future improvements to current practice. METHOD: Five service users, three informal carers and seven healthcare staff completed semi-structured interviews, which were thematically analysed to create four themes. RESULTS: Positive interaction and engagement in activities were critical for a therapeutic approach to observations, supporting service users and staff to minimize the unproductive behaviours that can arise. Difficulties balancing safety with privacy could suggest the importance of proportionate and tailored observation procedures for each service user. Ensuring the voices of service users and informal carers remain central to decisions regarding care could further improve the observation experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study highlights therapeutic, proportionate and co-produced observations as key characteristics to improve practice. Further training and formalization of the observation process could foster cultural changes towards more long-term approaches to risk management.

Gaining an Empathetic Insight into Parenting: Evaluating Infant Simulator Dolls for Professional Learning.

The development of an empathetic approach when working with parents and families is fundamental to both social work and children's nursing; however, opportunities to develop this are limited. RealCare Baby infant simulator dolls were used with the aim of enabling students to gain an empathetic insight into parenting. A qualitative, evaluation study involving semistructured interviews with 10 social work and 11 children's nursing students was undertaken to evaluate experiences and views of infant simulator dolls, in relation to professional learning. Using reflexive thematic analysis of interview data, six key themes were identified: (1) positive experiences, (2) challenges, (3) impact on self, (4) empathy toward parents, (5) realism and (6) learning by reflection. All themes were evident from the participants' accounts in the context of the parenting experience. In addition to the overall positive impact on students, practical and technical challenges were also identified. However, despite these difficulties, participants valued the learning experience gained from caring for a doll and many articulated how an empathetic understanding of the parenting role was enhanced. This will potentially enable social work and children's nursing students to support parents more sensitively and empathetically.

Applying Universal Principles of 'Best Interest': Practice Challenges across Transnational Jurisdictions, Cultural Norms, and Values.

This article sets out key issues in determining and upholding the best interests of children, in need of social service support, who have family networks that span outside of the UK. These issues are then analysed against whether and how child protection professionals take these into account along with an overall consideration of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child's (UNCRC) 'best interests of the child', when assessing and planning for those needs in kinship care cases. Building on these themes, the findings of an exploratory study on international kinship care cases carried out by Children and Families Across Borders (CFAB), the UK branch of the non-governmental organisation, International Social Service, as well as CFAB's associated Freedom of Information Requests to the UK government, are examined. These are then analysed in relation to legal and policy documents in England. Agency case records are analysed to identify a range of factors for children placed with 'kinship' carers across national borders, relating to the cultural relativity of the 'best interest' principle, the availability of family support in different social service structures, the understanding and application of legislation and policy in transnational contexts, and the availability of markers to track and analyse the scale of children crossing borders to join family.

Whole Life: a feasibility study of a recovery-focussed intervention in patients with stabilised schizophrenia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations].

Background: The Recovery Approach is about supporting people to live the best life they possibly can. This paper reports on a 2008-11 study of a recovery-focussed, one-to-one coaching programme called Whole Life (WL) in a group of people with stabilised schizophrenia. WL comprises 15 modules, each addressing an aspect of life that may pose challenges for someone with mental illness. It involves regular meetings with a coach, additional homework activities and lasts approximately one-year. This level of commitment requires participants to be motivated and enthusiastic. Methods: This was a non-randomised feasibility study, designed to assess acceptability and potential benefits of WL. The WL group was compared to another group of people with the same diagnosis, who received their usual treatment. This was not a strict control group. The primary outcome measure was the Social Adaptation Self-Assessment Scale. Results: Of those recruited to the WL group, 33/44 (75%) completed the full programme. WL participants showed an 11-point increase in mean SASS between baseline and Week 60. Subjective ratings showed benefits of WL at 3 and 6 months after the intervention had ceased, with most saying they felt better and none saying that they felt worse. The comparison group was more ill than the WL group at baseline and showed some improvement over the course of the study, albeit at a lower level than the WL group. However, controlling for baseline group differences meant that none of the outcome measures could reliably distinguish between WL and comparison groups. Conclusions: The study showed that WL is an acceptable and helpful intervention for motivated and enthusiastic individuals. It may have wider applicability for people with a less serious and chronic mental illness, although we do not know how it compares to other interventions. We discuss some methodological limitations of the study.

Undertaking pre-pilot work to gain an empathetic insight into participants' perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Being an empathetic researcher can be crucial in understanding participants' perspectives. However, while the need for empathy is recognised in qualitative interview research, there is less acknowledgement of its value with other methods of collecting data. Researchers can face various challenges when the instruments and approaches used to collect data are new to them. The value of researchers acting as participants when undertaking pre-pilot work are not be underestimated. AIM: To provide a reflective account of the pre-pilot work undertaken by the authors before their main study. DISCUSSION: Pre-pilot work that involves the researchers as participants can develop cultural competence, as well as empathetic insight into participants' perspectives, thus enabling them to refine and strengthen their main study. CONCLUSION: It takes time when planning research to incorporate appropriate pre-pilot work that assists personal training and learning. However, this can pay dividends in terms of the empathetic insight gained for the refinement of the proposed study. Pre-pilot work and a reflective approach can strengthen rigour, as well as assist in planning research and collecting data. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Experienced researchers may be novices at using specific tools or methods of collecting data. Pre-pilot work enables a greater understanding and deeper appreciation of participants' perspectives.

Risk assessment in mental health: staff attitudes and an estimate of time cost.

BACKGROUND: Risk assessment is a routine part of mental health services, with professionals being required to complete a risk assessment proforma (RAP) for every patient under their care. AIMS: This study was designed to investigate staff attitudes to, and beliefs about, the completion of risk assessment paperwork. METHOD: We surveyed 300 professionals across one county to examine: (i) the amount of time taken to complete RAPs; (ii) attitudes towards completing such paperwork; and (iii) beliefs about the quality and usefulness of the information recorded. RESULTS: We found considerable variation in the amount of time taken to complete RAPs. The median time was 18 minutes with doctors spending significantly less time than nurses. More favourable attitudes towards RAPs were seen in nurses than in doctors, in spite of the increased time spent completing them. Moreover, nurses also held more positive views about the value and benefit of the information recorded in RAPs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that RAP completion may account for a significant proportion of staff time. Inter-professional differences in belief and attitude were prominent and this should be an important consideration in the evolution of risk assessment procedures.