RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the clinical performance of a deep learning (DL)-enhanced two-fold accelerated PET imaging method in patients with lymphoma. METHODS: A total of 123 cases devoid of lymphoma underwent whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans to facilitate the development of an advanced SAU2Net model, which combines the advantages of U2Net and attention mechanism. This model integrated inputs from simulated 1/2-dose (0.07 mCi/kg) PET acquisition across multiple slices to generate an estimated standard dose (0.14 mCi/kg) PET scan. Additional 39 cases with confirmed lymphoma pathology were utilized to evaluate the model's clinical performance. Assessment criteria encompassed peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), a 5-point Likert scale rated by two experienced physicians, SUV features, image noise in the liver, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Diagnostic outcomes, including lesion numbers and Deauville score, were also compared. RESULTS: Images enhanced by the proposed DL method exhibited superior image quality (P < 0.001) in comparison to low-dose acquisition. Moreover, they illustrated equivalent image quality in terms of subjective image analysis and lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as compared to the standard acquisition method. A linear regression model with y = 1.017x + 0.110 ( R 2 = 1.00 ${R^2} = \;1.00$ ) can be established between the enhanced scans and the standard acquisition for lesion SUVmax. With enhancement, increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), CNR, and reduced image noise were observed, surpassing those of the standard acquisition. DL-enhanced PET images got diagnostic results essentially equavalent to standard PET images according to two experienced readers. CONCLUSION: The proposed DL method could facilitate a 50% reduction in PET imaging duration for lymphoma patients, while concurrently preserving image quality and diagnostic accuracy.
RESUMO
Background: Identifying epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) is vital for treatment decision-making. This study aimed to establish a convenient and noninvasive nomogram prediction model based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging and clinical features to predict EGFR mutation status in patients with LADC. Methods: A total of 274 patients (male 130, female 144, median age 65 years) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Imaging data from 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinical information were analyzed, with the Mann-Whitney U test, Student's t-test, and chi-square test used to compare categorical or continuous covariates as appropriate. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent variables associated with EGFR mutation status, from which the nomogram prediction model was constructed. Leave-one-out cross-validation was performed, and the discrimination ability and calibration of the nomogram were assessed by calculating the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve and the calibration curve. The clinical net benefit of the nomogram was evaluated. Results: Of the 274 patients, 143 (52.2%) had EGFR mutations. Female sex [odds ratios (OR): 2.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-5.45, P=0.008], non-smoking status (OR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.30-5.88, P=0.008), mean standardized uptake value ≤9.23 (OR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.35-4.55, P=0.004), metabolic tumor volume ≤17.72 cm3 (OR: 5.00, 95% CI: 2.38-12.50, P<0.001) and the presence of pleural retraction (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.05-3.40, P=0.034) were independent predictors for EGFR mutations in LADCs. The nomogram based on these risk factors showed good predictive efficacy, with an area under the curve of 0.805 (95% CI: 0.753-0.857), a sensitivity of 90.2%, a specificity of 59.5% and an accuracy of 73.0%. Conclusions: The nomogram prediction model incorporating sex, smoking status, mean standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume, and the presence of pleural retraction could effectively discriminate EGFR-mutant from wild-type LADCs.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the predictive performance of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) of primary lesions based on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for EGFR mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched as of January 1, 2021. Studies whose reported data could be used to construct contingency tables were included. Study characteristics were extracted, and methodological quality assessment was conducted by two separate reviewers using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated. The possible causes of heterogeneity were analysed by meta-regression. RESULTS: The 18 included studies had a total of 4024 patients. The majority of the studies showed a low to unclear risk of bias and concerns of applicability. For differentiating EGFR-mutant NSCLC from wild-type NSCLC, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 71 % and 60 % for SUVmax and 64 % and 63 % for SUVmean, respectively. The summary AUROCs of SUVmax and SUVmean were 0.69 (95 % CI, 0.65-0.73) and 0.68 (95 % CI, 0.64-0.72), respectively. The meta-regression analysis indicated that blindness to EGFR mutation test results, the number of readers and the number of PET/CT scanners were possible causes of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis implied that SUVmax and SUVmean of primary lesions from 18F-FDG PET/CT harboured moderate predictive efficacy for the EGFR mutation status of NSCLC.
