Radiographic patterns and characteristics of sagittal profiles in normal spinopelvic curvatures: An explicit depiction of the distribution of lumbar vertebral bodies and discs.

The current study aimed to investigate the sagittal morphology of the spinopelvic complex and the components of the lumbar spine in the normal population. In total, 132 adult volunteers were retrospectively evaluated and divided into four groups according to the Roussouly classification. Statistical analysis of radiological parameters, including lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), PI-LL, LL-TK, lumbar vertebral lordosis from L1 to L5 (L1L-L5L), the intervertebral angle from L1-L2 to L5-S1 (IVA1-2-IVA5-1), segmental lordosis from L1 to L5 (S1L-S5L), the proportion of L1-L5 (L1%-L5%), the proportion of the intervertebral angle from L1-L2 to L5-S1 (IVA1-2%-IVA5-1%), and proportion of segmental lordosis from L1 to L5 (S1L%-S5L%), was performed. Based on the classification, type II (n = 46) was the most common, followed by type I (n = 39), type III (n = 36), and type IV (n = 11). The quantitative values of the sagittal parameters of the four groups were obtained. Results showed a significant difference in terms of LL, PI, SS, and LL-TK. Further, L1%, L2%, L3%, IVA1-2%, IVA2-3%, S1L%, S2L%, and S3L% had an increasing trend. PI was positively correlated with LL, S1L, S2L, S3L, S4L, S1L%, and S2L%, but not with S5L%. In conclusion, pelvic parameters had a significant effect on lumbar curvature and lordosis distribution. Further, the abovementioned results were beneficial for individual surgical decision-making regarding targeted intervertebral angle, screw-insertion dimension, and rod contouring.

Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis Combined with Thoracic Spinal Stenosis Treated by Endoscopic Surgery: A Case Report.

CASE: A 48-year-old man presented to our facility with debilitating motor and sensory symptoms due to advanced T10-11 thoracic spinal stenosis secondary to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). The patient's condition was addressed with endoscopic spine surgery through a yet-to-be-reported interlaminar approach, and at the 12-month follow-up, his neurologic function was significantly improved. CONCLUSION: Select patients with symptomatic thoracic spinal stenosis secondary to DISH can be effectively managed with endoscopic spine surgery through an interlaminar approach by clinicians with extensive endoscopic spine experience.

Is Any Correlation Present Between the Severity of Syndesmophytes and Spinopelvic and Clinical Parameters in Advanced Ankylosing Spondylitis?

OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the severity of syndesmophytes and its correlation with the spinopelvic and clinical outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: The data from 41 consecutive patients with AS who had undergone pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery at our institution were reviewed. The computed tomography syndesmophyte score (CTSS), a novel method of evaluating the severity of syndesmophytes, was applied to assess the syndesmophytes of the whole, cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. The measured spinopelvic parameters included global kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. The Oswestry disability index questionnaire, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were used to evaluate the clinical outcome. The Pearson correlation test was performed to identify correlations between syndesmophyte severity and the spinopelvic and clinical parameters. RESULTS: The Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the whole CTSS (WCTSS), cervical CTSS, thoracic CTSS, and lumbar CTSS (LCTSS) correlated significantly with each other (P < 0.05). All the CTSSs correlated positively with age, disease duration, and pelvic tilt (P < 0.05). In addition, both sagittal vertical axis and lumbar lordosis were significantly related to the WCTSS, cervical CTSS, and LCTSS (P < 0.05). The Oswestry disability index correlated negatively with the WCTSS (r = -0.312; P < 0.05), thoracic CTSS (r = -0.314; P < 0.05), and LCTSS (r = -0.343; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In advanced AS, old age and a long disease duration are risk factors for the progression of syndesmophytes. The progression of syndesmophytes might contribute to spinal sagittal malalignment. With serious syndesmophytes, pelvic retroversion seems to be the major compensatory mechanism for spinal sagittal malalignment.