Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Chin Med J (Engl) ; 133(15): 1815-1823, 2020 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32649510

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial dysfunction is considered a key pathophysiologic process for the development of acute lung injury. In this study, we aimed at investigating the effects of unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced changes of vascular endothelial-cadherin (VE-cadherin) and the potential underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Male C57BL/6 J mice were randomized into three groups: vehicle, LPS, and LPS + UFH groups. Intraperitoneal injection of 30 mg/kg LPS was used to induce sepsis. Mice in the LPS + UFH group received subcutaneous injection of 8 U UFH 0.5 h before LPS injection. The lung tissue of the mice was collected for assessing lung injury by measuring the lung wet/dry (W/D) weight ratio and observing histological changes. Human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMECs) were cultured and used to analyze the effects of UFH on LPS- or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced vascular hyperpermeability, membrane expression of VE-cadherin, p120-catenin, and phosphorylated myosin light chain (p-MLC), and F-actin remodeling, and on the LPS-induced activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/serine/threonine kinase (Akt)/nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling pathway. RESULTS: In vivo, UFH pretreatment significantly attenuated LPS-induced pulmonary histopathological changes (neutrophil infiltration and erythrocyte effusion, alveolus pulmonis collapse, and thicker septum), decreased the lung W/D, and increased protein concentration (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 0.57 ±â€Š0.04 vs. 0.32 ±â€Š0.04 mg/mL, P = 0.0092), total cell count (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 9.57 ±â€Š1.23 vs. 3.65 ±â€Š0.78 × 10/mL, P = 0.0155), polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 88.05% ±â€Š2.88% vs. 22.20% ±â€Š3.92%, P = 0.0002), and TNF-α (460.33 ±â€Š23.48 vs. 189.33 ±â€Š14.19 pg/mL, P = 0.0006) in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. In vitro, UFH pre-treatment prevented the LPS-induced decrease in the membrane expression of VE-cadherin (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 0.368 ±â€Š0.044 vs. 0.716 ±â€Š0.064, P = 0.0114) and p120-catenin (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 0.208 ±â€Š0.018 vs. 0.924 ±â€Š0.092, P = 0.0016), and the LPS-induced increase in the expression of p-MLC (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 0.972 ±â€Š0.092 vs. 0.293 ±â€Š0.025, P = 0.0021). Furthermore, UFH attenuated LPS- and TNF-α-induced hyperpermeability of HPMECs (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 8.90 ±â€Š0.66 vs. 15.84 ±â€Š1.09 Ω·cm, P = 0.0056; TNF-α vs. TNF-α + UFH: 11.28 ±â€Š0.64 vs. 18.15 ±â€Š0.98 Ω·cm, P = 0.0042) and F-actin remodeling (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 56.25 ±â€Š1.51 vs. 39.70 ±â€Š1.98, P = 0.0027; TNF-α vs. TNF-α + UFH: 55.42 ±â€Š1.42 vs. 36.51 ±â€Š1.20, P = 0.0005) in vitro. Additionally, UFH decreased the phosphorylation of Akt (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 0.977 ±â€Š0.081 vs. 0.466 ±â€Š0.035, P = 0.0045) and I kappa B Kinase (IKK) (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 1.023 ±â€Š0.070 vs. 0.578 ±â€Š0.044, P = 0.0060), and the nuclear translocation of NF-κB (LPS vs. LPS + UFH: 1.003 ±â€Š0.077 vs. 0.503 ±â€Š0.065, P = 0.0078) in HPMECs, which was similar to the effect of the PI3K inhibitor, wortmannin. CONCLUSIONS: The protective effect of UFH against LPS-induced pulmonary endothelial barrier dysfunction involves VE-cadherin stabilization and PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling.


Assuntos
Heparina , NF-kappa B , Animais , Células Endoteliais , Lipopolissacarídeos/toxicidade , Pulmão , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinase , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases , Fosfatidilinositóis , Serina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...