Dried Plasma Spots and Oral Fluid as Alternative Matrices for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Busulfan: Analytical Method Development and Clinical Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Busulfan (BU) is an alkylating agent with a narrow therapeutic index and high intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability used in conditioning therapy for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Monitoring BU exposure during high-dose conditioning regimens is recommended and positively impacts outcomes. We aimed to develop, validate, and apply a ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (MS)/MS assay to measure BU concentrations in oral fluid and dried plasma spots (DPS) as alternative matrices to plasma. METHODS: We prepared plasma and oral fluid samples by protein precipitation and DPS after liquid extraction. We analyzed extracts using an LC-MS/MS system with an Acquity HSS T3 column in the positive electrospray ionization mode. The method was validated and applied to 79 paired plasma and oral fluid samples from 7 patients on BU conditioning treatment. DPS were prepared by pipetting plasma onto Whatman 903 paper. The correlation between BU in plasma, oral fluid, and DPS samples was evaluated. RESULTS: Run time was 4.0 minutes. The assay was linear at 50-5000 ng mL-1 (r > 0.99), precise (1.9%-5.3% oral fluid and 1.8%-5.9% DPS), and accurate (98.1%-108.9% oral fluid and 93%-103.1% DPS). BU was stable in DPS at 23°C for 24 hours. BU levels in oral fluid (r = 0.927) and DPS (r = 0.982) were significantly correlated with plasma. Despite the good correlation, we found a wide variation between oral fluid and plasma levels. The area under curves (AUCs) calculated with oral fluid concentrations were 79.1%-167.1% of plasma AUCs. Bland-Altman plots found a better agreement for DPS, with AUCs estimated from corrected DPS levels at 83.1%-114.1% of plasma values. CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a simple and fast ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-MS/MS assay to measure BU in oral fluid and DPS. The results do not support the use of oral fluid as a matrix for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of BU. The AUC estimated from BU measurements in DPS was comparable to that in plasma, supporting the use of DPS in BU therapeutic drug monitoring as an alternative matrix, with adequate short-term stability and logistic advantages.

Analytical and clinical validation of a dried blood spot assay for the determination of paclitaxel using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (PCT) is a chemotherapeutic drug widely used for the treatment of several types of tumors, and its use is associated with severe adverse events, mainly neurologic and hematopoietic toxicities. The relation between systemic exposure and clinical response to PCT was previously described, making paclitaxel a potential candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The use of dried blood spot (DBS) sampling could allow complex sampling schedules required for TDM of PCT. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of PCT in DBS. METHODS: PCT was extracted from one 8 mm DBS punch with a mixture of methanol and acetonitrile, followed by chromatographic separation in a Kinetex C18 (50 × 4.6 mm, 2.6 µm) column. Detection was performed in a 5500-QTRAP® mass spectrometer, with a run time of 2.3 min. RESULTS: The assay was linear in the range of 2.5 to 400 ng mL-1. Precision (CV%) and accuracy at the concentration levels of 7.5, 40 and 150 ng mL-1 were 1.69-4.9% and 106.25 to 109.92%, respectively. PCT was stable for 21 days at 25 and 45 °C. The method was applied to DBS samples obtained from 34 patients under PCT chemotherapy. The use of a simple correction factor, derived from the correlation between PCT concentrations in plasma and DBS in this set of patients, allowed unbiased estimation of PCT plasma concentrations from DBS measurements, with similar clinical decisions using either plasma or DBS measurements. CONCLUSIONS: DBS testing of PCT concentrations represents a promising alternative for the dissemination of PCT dose individualization.