Effects of food or sleep deprivation during civilian survival training on clinical chemistry variables.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical chemistry and weight changes after short-term food or sleep deprivation or multiple deprivations during civilian survival training. METHODS: Data from one baseline-controlled two-period crossover study designed to compare sleep deprivation for up to 50 hours with food deprivation for up to 66 hours (n = 12) and data from regular multiple-deprivations survival training comparing participants (n = 33) with nondeprived instructors (n = 10). RESULTS: Food deprivation was associated with decreased body weight, blood glucose, serum triglycerides, sodium, chloride, and urine pH, and there were increases in blood and urine ketones and serum free fatty acids. Sleep deprivation was associated with a minor decrease in hemoglobin and erythrocyte particle count and volume fraction and an increase in leukocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical chemistry and body weight changes associated with food deprivation were qualitatively similar to those observed in fasting obese patients but developed quicker in the survival training setting. Sleep deprivation had few effects on the clinical chemistry profile except for hematological variables. Physicians evaluating clinical chemistry data from patients subjected to short-term food or sleep deprivation should take the physiological state into account in their assessment.

Effect of probenecid and quinidine on the transport of alovudine (3'-fluorothymidine) to the rat brain studied by microdialysis.

Microdialysis was used to sample extracellular unbound concentrations of alovudine in order to study the influence of well-known transport inhibitors (probenecid and quinidine) on the transport of alovudine between the blood and the brain extracellular fluid or whole brain tissue. The AUC (area under the time versus concentration curve) ratio brain extracellular fluid/serum was 0.17+/-0.036 after a subcutaneous injection of alovudine 25 mg/kg in rats treated with probenecid 25 mg/kg subcutaneous (n=5), which was not significantly different from the control group (AUC ratio 0.24+/-0.039). Perfusion through the microdialysis probe with probenecid 100 microM (n=4) also had no effect on the brain extracellular fluid/serum AUC ratio after alovudine 25 mg/kg subcutaneous. The AUC ratio brain extracellular fluid/serum was 0.085+/-0.009 after subcutaneous injection of alovudine 25 mg/kg in rats treated with quinidine 25 mg/kg intraperitoneally (n=8), which was significantly lower than the control group. However, the whole brain tissue concentration was not significantly different between control rats (n=5) and rats treated with quinidine (n=4) 1 hr after subcutaneous injection of alovudine 25 mg/kg (brain to serum ratios being 0.11+/-0.006 and 0.10+/-0.005 respectively). Finally, the microdialysis recovery of alovudine increased with increasing concentrations (10, 50, 250, 1250 microM) of alovudine in the perfusion fluid. The recovery of alovudine was increased in quinidine-treated rats but not in those given probenecid. Thus, probenecid does not significantly influence the concentration gradient of alovudine over the blood-brain barrier in the rat after systemic or after local administration, while quinidine lowered brain extracellular fluid concentration of alovudine, but not total brain tissue concentration. The mechanism behind this phenomenon is not yet known.