Protocolo informático de manejo integral de la sepsis. Descripción de un sistema de identificación precoz / Computerised sepsis protocol management. Description of an early warning system

Introducción: Es preciso desarrollar nuevas estrategias que permitan una identificación precoz y una inmediata instauración de medidas efectivas en el abordaje de la sepsis. La unidad multidisciplinar de sepsis (UMS) desarrolló una herramienta: el Protocolo Informático de Manejo Integral de la Sepsis (PIMIS). El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la intervención de la UMS y la utilidad del PIMIS. Métodos: Se analizaron las intervenciones según fueran realizadas por consulta directamente solicitada (activación de PIMIS o consulta telefónica) o no solicitada (aislamientos microbiológicos y el Sistema Informático de Detección de Constantes Vitales [SIDCV]), los servicios, el tipo de infección, la recomendación de cambio de antibiótico y el grado de aceptación. Resultados: De las 1.581 consultas, el 65,1% se solicitaron directamente: un 84,1% por activación del PIMIS por el médico responsable y un 15,9% por contacto telefónico directo. Entre las consultas no solicitadas, el 95,2% procedían de microbiología y el 4,8% del SIDCV. Las consultas directamente solicitadas se realizaron más precozmente que las no solicitadas (5,63días vs. 8,47días; p<0,001) y la frecuencia fue mayor en los servicios médicos frente a los quirúrgicos (73,0% vs. 39,1%; p<0,001). Se recomendó un cambio de antibiótico en el 32% de las primeras consultas y se aceptó en el 78,1% de los casos. Conclusiones: La elevada proporción de consultas directamente solicitadas y aceptación de las recomendaciones demuestra que la intervención de la UMS es valorada y respetada. El PIMIS es el principal mecanismo de consulta, lo que lo convierte en una herramienta útil y conveniente para la identificación precoz y el abordaje de la sepsis (AU)

Introduction: New strategies need to be developed for the early recognition and rapid response for the management of sepsis. To achieve this purpose, the Multidisciplinary Sepsis Team (MST) developed the Computerised Sepsis Protocol Management (PIMIS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the convenience of using PIMIS, as well as the activity of the MST. Methods: An analysis was performed on the data collected from solicited MST consultations (direct activation of PIMIS by attending physician or telephone request) and unsolicited ones (by referral from the microbiology laboratory or an automatic referral via the hospital vital signs recording software [SIDCV]), as well as the hospital department, source of infection, treatment recommendation, and acceptance of this. Results: Of the 1,581 first consultations, 65.1% were solicited consultations (84.1% activation of PIMIS and 15.9% by telephone). The majority of unsolicited consultations were generated by the microbiology laboratory (95.2%), and 4.8% from the SIDCV. Referral from solicited consultations were generated sooner (5.63days vs 8.47days; P<.001) and came from clinical specialties rather than from the surgical ward (73.0% vs 39.1%; P<.001). A recommendation was made for antimicrobial prescription change in 32% of first consultations. The treating physician accepted 78.1% of recommendations. Conclusions: The high rate of solicited consultations and acceptance of recommended prescription changes suggest that a MST is seen as a helpful resource, and that PIMIS software is perceived to be useful and convenient to use, as it is the main source of referral (AU)

Computerised sepsis protocol management. Description of an early warning system. / Protocolo informático de manejo integral de la sepsis. Descripción de un sistema de identificación precoz.

INTRODUCTION: New strategies need to be developed for the early recognition and rapid response for the management of sepsis. To achieve this purpose, the Multidisciplinary Sepsis Team (MST) developed the Computerised Sepsis Protocol Management (PIMIS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the convenience of using PIMIS, as well as the activity of the MST. METHODS: An analysis was performed on the data collected from solicited MST consultations (direct activation of PIMIS by attending physician or telephone request) and unsolicited ones (by referral from the microbiology laboratory or an automatic referral via the hospital vital signs recording software [SIDCV]), as well as the hospital department, source of infection, treatment recommendation, and acceptance of this. RESULTS: Of the 1,581 first consultations, 65.1% were solicited consultations (84.1% activation of PIMIS and 15.9% by telephone). The majority of unsolicited consultations were generated by the microbiology laboratory (95.2%), and 4.8% from the SIDCV. Referral from solicited consultations were generated sooner (5.63days vs 8.47days; P<.001) and came from clinical specialties rather than from the surgical ward (73.0% vs 39.1%; P<.001). A recommendation was made for antimicrobial prescription change in 32% of first consultations. The treating physician accepted 78.1% of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of solicited consultations and acceptance of recommended prescription changes suggest that a MST is seen as a helpful resource, and that PIMIS software is perceived to be useful and convenient to use, as it is the main source of referral.