Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Angle Orthod ; 81(5): 856-64, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21469969

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the values of different measurements taken on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) are comparable with those taken on two-dimensional (2D) images from conventional lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCRs) and to examine if there are differences between the different types of CBCT software when taking those measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight patients were selected who had both an LRC and a CBCT. The 3D reconstructions of each patient in the CBCT were evaluated using two different software packages, NemoCeph 3D and InVivo5. An observer took 10 angular and 3 linear measurements on each of the three types of record on two different occasions. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability was high except for the mandibular plane and facial cone (from the LCR), the Na-Ans distance (using NemoCeph 3D), and facial cone and the Ans-Me distance (using InVivo5). No statistically significant differences were found for the angular and linear measurements between the LCRs and the CBCTs for any measurement, and the correlation levels were high for all measurements. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were found between the angular and linear measurements taken with the LCR and those taken with the CBCT. Neither were there any statistically significant differences between the angular or linear measurements using the two CBCT software packages.


Assuntos
Cefalometria/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Face/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Incisivo/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagem , Maxila/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso Nasal/diagnóstico por imagem , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Palato/diagnóstico por imagem , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sela Túrcica/diagnóstico por imagem , Software , Adulto Jovem
2.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol ; 22(3): 379-88, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17303375

RESUMO

The detection of feigned cognitive impairment remains difficult and may be even more challenging in certain population groups. Studies on the use of neuropsychological tests in ethnic groups for which they were not designed have shown variations in performance associated with cultural differences. With this background, our group studied a Spanish population by applying commonly used procedures [Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT), Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), and the b test] in a group with post-concussion syndrome (PCS) (whether litigants or not) and in a group of analog malingerers (AN). These tests appeared to function adequately in this Spanish population, who showed similar performances to results published for North Americans.


Assuntos
Simulação de Doença/diagnóstico , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/diagnóstico , Reconhecimento Psicológico/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Comparação Transcultural , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Simulação de Doença/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/psicologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...