Validation of a questionnaire for asthma case identification in pre-schools in Latin America.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We recently developed and validated a screening questionnaire for determining which school-aged children may need further investigation to diagnose and manage asthma. In the present study we sought to extend this to pre-school aged children. METHODS: Questions from the school-aged questionnaire and literature on pre-school asthma were used to inform a focus group of parents with pre-school-aged children with asthma to develop a screening questionnaire. Parents of children attending 6 randomly selected kindergartens in Trelew, Argentina (n = 639) were invited to respond to the questionnaire. A reliability test-retest was undertaken in 187 randomly selected parents who completed the same questionnaire twice within 2-5 weeks. Clinical assessment included a standardized history and physical examination, spirometry before and after a ß-agonist inhaler, and chest X-ray. Asthma was diagnosed by the pulmonologist. RESULTS: Completed surveys were returned for 620 children, 607 of whom underwent clinical evaluation. The mean age was 4.21 years (range of 3.01-5.50) and included 82.5% white and 49.4% male children. Asthma was diagnosed in 103 (17.0%) children); 72 (69.9%) of these children did not have a previous diagnosis of asthma. The specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the questionnaire were 93.2%, 86.1%, 57.8% and 98.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the utility of a screening questionnaire for identifying pre-school-aged children who may benefit from further assessment for asthma.

Validation of a school-based written questionnaire for asthma case identification in Argentina.

Recognition of asthma in community-based surveys can be problematic. We sought to develop and validate questionnaires that could identify elementary school-aged children likely to have asthma or who had poorly-controlled asthma. Questionnaires for parents (PQ) and students (SQ) to complete were developed using guidance on question wording from a focus group consisting of children with asthma and their parents. The gold standard for this study was a pulmonologist determination of asthma and this was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for each question and for combinations of questions. Questionnaires were distributed to 830 children attending elementary schools in Trelew, Argentina and 96% were returned. Test-retest reliability was determined in 221 randomly selected parents and children and very good levels of agreement were seen for individual questions. Asthma was diagnosed in 92 students. Overall, the PQ was able to detect asthma better than the SQ. Optimal diagnostic ability came by combining questions from the PQ and SQ. Not surprisingly, these questionnaires had a better NPV than PPV and can be used to determine which children require further evaluation.