Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Neurología sobre el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple y manejo holístico del paciente 2023 / Consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of multiple sclerosis and holistic patient management in 2023

El último documento de consenso del Grupo de Estudio de Enfermedades Desmielinizantes de la Sociedad Española de Neurología sobre el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple (EM) data del año 2016. Aunque muchas consideraciones continúan todavía vigentes, desde entonces se han producido cambios significativos en el manejo y tratamiento de esta enfermedad, motivados no solo por la aprobación de nuevos fármacos con diferentes mecanismos de acción, sino también por la evolución de conceptos otrora consolidados. Esto ha permitido abordar situaciones especiales como el embarazo y la vacunación desde otra perspectiva, e incluir nuevas variables en la toma de decisiones en práctica clínica, como plantear tratamiento modificador de la enfermedad (TME) de alta eficacia en fases tempranas, considerar la perspectiva del paciente y utilizar nuevas tecnologías como monitorización remota. Estos cambios han motivado la presente actualización del consenso mediante metodología Delphi, con el objetivo de reflejar el nuevo paradigma de manejo del paciente con EM basándose en la evidencia científica y la experiencia clínica de los participantes. Entre las principales conclusiones destacan como recomendaciones: iniciar TME inmunomodulador en el síndrome radiológico aislado con actividad radiológica persistente, evaluar la perspectiva del paciente y abandonar la terminología «líneas de tratamiento» en la clasificación de los TME (consenso mayor del 90%). Tras el diagnóstico de EM la elección del primer TME debería considerar la presencia/ausencia de factores de mal pronóstico (epidemiológicos, clínicos, radiológicos y biomarcadores) para la aparición de nuevos brotes o progresión de discapacidad, pudiendo plantear desde el inicio TME de alta eficacia. (AU)

The last consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Demyelinating Diseases Study Group on the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was issued in 2016. Although many of the positions taken remain valid, there have been significant changes in the management and treatment of MS, both due to the approval of new drugs with different action mechanisms and due to the evolution of previously fixed concepts. This has enabled new approaches to specific situations such as pregnancy and vaccination, and the inclusion of new variables in clinical decision-making, such as the early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT), consideration of the patient's perspective, and the use of such novel technologies as remote monitoring. In the light of these changes, this updated consensus statement, developed according to the Delphi method, seeks to reflect the new paradigm in the management of patients with MS, based on the available scientific evidence and the clinical expertise of the participants. The most significant recommendations are that immunomodulatory DMT be started in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome with persistent radiological activity, that patient perspectives be considered, and that the term “lines of therapy” no longer be used in the classification of DMTs (> 90% consensus). Following diagnosis of MS, the first DMT should be selected according to the presence/absence of factors of poor prognosis (whether epidemiological, clinical, radiological, or biomarkers) for the occurrence of new relapses or progression of disability; high-efficacy DMTs may be considered from disease onset. (AU)

Consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of multiple sclerosis and holistic patient management in 2023.

The last consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Neurology's Demyelinating Diseases Study Group on the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) was issued in 2016. Although many of the positions taken remain valid, there have been significant changes in the management and treatment of MS, both due to the approval of new drugs with different action mechanisms and due to the evolution of previously fixed concepts. This has enabled new approaches to specific situations such as pregnancy and vaccination, and the inclusion of new variables in clinical decision-making, such as the early use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT), consideration of the patient's perspective, and the use of such novel technologies as remote monitoring. In the light of these changes, this updated consensus statement, developed according to the Delphi method, seeks to reflect the new paradigm in the management of patients with MS, based on the available scientific evidence and the clinical expertise of the participants. The most significant recommendations are that immunomodulatory DMT be started in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome with persistent radiological activity, that patient perspectives be considered, and that the term "lines of therapy" no longer be used in the classification of DMTs (> 90% consensus). Following diagnosis of MS, the first DMT should be selected according to the presence/absence of factors of poor prognosis (whether epidemiological, clinical, radiological, or biomarkers) for the occurrence of new relapses or progression of disability; high-efficacy DMTs may be considered from disease onset.

Alemtuzumab treatment in real clinical practice: Experience in a multicenter cohort.

BACKGROUND: Alemtuzumab is a highly effective treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), but in recent years safety-related concerns had emerged due to description of novel serious side effects not registered in CARE-MS I and CARE-MS II phase 3 studies, nor in TOPAZ extension study. Data about alemtuzumab use in real clinical practice are limited and based mainly on retrospective studies with small sample sizes. Therefore, more information about effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab in this context is needed. METHODS: A multicenter observational prospective study to investigate effectivity and safety of alemtuzumab in a real-world setting was performed. Primary endpoints were the change in annualized relapse rate (ARR), and in disability measured by EDSS score. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative probability of confirmed 6-month disability improvement and worsening. Disability worsening and disability improvement were considered when the EDSS score was increased or decreased, respectively, in 1 point if baseline EDSS score was <5.0, or in 0.5 point if baseline EDSS score was ≥5.5, confirmed over 6 months. Other secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved NEDA-3 status (absence of clinical relapses, disability EDSS progression, and MRI disease activity as depicted by new/enlarging T2 lesions or Gadolinium enhancing T1 lesions). Adverse events also were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 195 RRMS patients (70% female) who started alemtuzumab treatment were included. Mean of follow-up was 2.38 years. Alemtuzumab significantly reduced the annualized relapse rate from baseline with risk reductions of 86%, 83.5%, and 84%, at 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up respectively (Friedman test, p-value < 0.05 for all comparisons). Alemtuzumab also significantly reduced EDSS score over one and two years after starting alemtuzumab treatment (Friedman test, p-value<0.001 for both comparisons). A high proportion of patients presented confirmed 6-month stability or disability improvement (92%, 82%, and 79%, over 1, 2 and 3 years of follow-up respectively). The proportion of patients who retained NEDA-3 status at 12, 24 and 36 months were 61%, 49%, and 42%, respectively. Baseline characteristics associated with a lower probability of achieving NEDA-3 were younger age, sex female, high ARR, elevated number of previous treatments, and switch from a second line therapy. Infusion related reactions were the most frequent adverse event observed. The most common infections were urinary tract infections (50%), and upper respiratory tract infections (19%) over the 3 years of follow- up. Secondary thyroid autoimmunity was developed in 18.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Alemtuzumab has demonstrated in real clinical practice high effectiveness in controlling multiple sclerosis activity, and no unexpected adverse events were observed.

[Plasma determination of neurofilaments as biomarkers in multiple sclerosis: conclusions of the EMotion Forum]. / Determinación plasmática de neurofilamentos como biomarcador en la esclerosis múltiple: conclusiones del foro EMotion.

INTRODUCTION: In the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) there is still a need to identify biomarkers of disease progression, and clinical and subclinical activity. Among them, determination of neurofilament light chain plasma levels (NfL-PM) has shown a possible correlation with clinical course and assessment of therapeutic response in MS patients. However, the determination of NfL-PM has to overcome several obstacles that hinder its integration into healthcare practice, such as the absence of normalised values and standardised protocols. AIM: This article has two main aims: a) to review the evidence on the usefulness of NfL in clinical practice as biomarkers of neurodegeneration and inflammation in MS, and b) to pool the conclusions from a forum of MS experts gathered to discuss the usefulness and applicability of NfL-PM determination in Spain (EMotion Forum 2020). DEVELOPMENT: NfL-PM seems particularly useful in determining subclinical activity in MS and offers the possibility of identifying populations at risk of developing MS, such as cases of radiologically isolated syndrome. Issues such as the monitoring of induction disease-modifying drugs or the assessment of suboptimal responses for the withdrawal of ineffective disease-modifying drugs should be considered. CONCLUSIONS: The experts agreed on the diagnostic and prognostic potential of NfL-PM determination and that its usefulness in MS can contribute to the general development of the technique.

TITLE: Determinación plasmática de neurofilamentos como biomarcador en la esclerosis múltiple: conclusiones del foro EMotion.Introducción. La identificación de biomarcadores de progresión de la enfermedad y de actividad clínica y subclínica continúa siendo una necesidad en el abordaje de la esclerosis múltiple (EM). Entre ellos, la determinación plasmática de niveles de los neurofilamentos de cadena ligera (NfL-PM) ha mostrado una posible correlación con la evolución clínica y la evaluación de la respuesta terapéutica en los pacientes con EM. Sin embargo, la determinación de NfL-PM afronta diversos obstáculos que dificultan su integración en la práctica asistencial, como la ausencia de valores normalizados y protocolos estandarizados. Objetivo. Este trabajo tiene un doble objetivo: a) revisar la evidencia sobre la utilidad en la práctica clínica de los NfL como biomarcadores de neurodegeneración e inflamación en la EM y b) recoger las conclusiones de un foro de expertos en EM reunidos para debatir sobre la utilidad y aplicabilidad de la determinación de NfL-PM en España (Foro EMotion 2020). Desarrollo. Los NfL-PM parecen particularmente útiles a la hora de determinar la actividad subclínica en la EM y ofrecen la posibilidad de identificar poblaciones con riesgo de desarrollo de EM, como los casos de síndrome radiológico aislado. Se deben considerar aspectos como la monitorización de fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad de inducción o la valoración de respuestas subóptimas para retirar fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad poco eficaces. Conclusiones. Los especialistas coincidieron en el potencial diagnóstico y pronóstico de la determinación de NfL-PM y en que su utilidad en la EM puede contribuir al desarrollo general de la técnica.