Recomendaciones sobre la prevención de aspiraciones de cuerpos extraños / Recommendations for the prevention of foreign body aspiration

La aspiración de un cuerpo extraño sigue siendo un problema pediátrico frecuente, con graves consecuencias, pudiendo producir tanto patología aguda como crónica. Suele afectar a niños por debajo de los 5 años, normalmente en su domicilio, que aspiran por lo común alimentos o frutos secos. Esta circunstancia puede provocar una crisis de asfixia aguda, constituyendo una urgencia médica que requiere de un diagnóstico precoz y una actitud terapéutica urgente, ya que puede producir la muerte en unos minutos. En el presente artículo, el Comité de Seguridad y Prevención de Lesiones No Intencionadas en la Infancia de la Asociación Española de Pediatría proporciona una serie de recomendaciones, tanto educativas (en la alimentación y en el juego) como legales para prevenir este tipo de lesiones

The aspiration of a foreign body remains a common paediatric problem, with serious consequences that can produce both acute and chronic disease. Aspiration usually causes a medical emergency that requires a prompt diagnosis and an urgent therapeutic approach as it may result in the death of the child or severe brain injury. It typically involves organic foreign bodies (mainly food or nuts) aspirated by children under 5 years old, and usually at home. In this statement, the Committee on Safety and Prevention of Non-Intentional Injury in Childhood of the Spanish Paediatrics Association provides a series of recommendations, both educational (while eating and playing), as well as legal, to prevent such episodes)

[Recommendations for the prevention of foreign body aspiration]. / Recomendaciones sobre la prevención de aspiraciones de cuerpos extraños.

The aspiration of a foreign body remains a common paediatric problem, with serious consequences that can produce both acute and chronic disease. Aspiration usually causes a medical emergency that requires a prompt diagnosis and an urgent therapeutic approach as it may result in the death of the child or severe brain injury. It typically involves organic foreign bodies (mainly food or nuts) aspirated by children under 5 years old, and usually at home. In this statement, the Committee on Safety and Prevention of Non-Intentional Injury in Childhood of the Spanish Paediatrics Association provides a series of recommendations, both educational (while eating and playing), as well as legal, to prevent such episodes.

Role of Intraluminal Esophageal Impedance Baseline in the Diagnosis of Esophagitis in Children.

Introduction Low values of esophageal impedance baseline (EIB) have been related to esophagitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EIB for erosive esophagitis (ErE) and histological esophagitis (HiE) in children studied for gastroesophageal reflux. Material and Methods Children who underwent esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) and upper-endoscopy with esophageal biopsies were studied retrospectively. EIB values were obtained by MII-pH. ErE was assessed by endoscopy following the Hetzel-Dent classification; HiE was defined by basal zone hyperplasia, papillary lengthening, or inflammatory infiltration. EIB was compared between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained to calculate the global diagnostic performance of EIB and to find cut-off values for sensitivity and specificity. Logistic regression was used for age adjustment. Results Fifty-one patients were studied: 11 had ErE and 23 had HiE. EIB median values were 1,159 in ErE versus 2,583 in non-ErE (U = 80, p < 0.01). The adjusted ROC curve analysis for ErE was 0.85 (95% CI = 0.74-0.96); the EIB cut-off value = 2,379 determined sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 52.6% in children < 4 years old. and sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 63.2% in children > 4 years old. EIB median values were 1,666 in HiE versus 2,669 in non-HiE (U = 80, p < 0.01). The adjusted ROC curve analysis for HiE was 0.75 (95% CI = 0.59-0.90); the EIB cut-off value = 2,296 determined sensitivity = 71.2% and specificity = 83.1% in children < 4 years old, and sensitivity = 75.1% and specificity = 80.1% in children > 4 years old. Conclusion EIB provides statistically significant diagnostic performances for ErE and HiE. It could become a useful tool, especially to discriminate between ErE and non-ErE, avoiding other invasive tests.

Diaphragmatic avulsion with chance fracture: a rare association in the seat belt syndrome.

Traumatic diaphragmatic injuries are uncommon in children. Chance fractures are typical in adults who had motor vehicle accidents but infrequent in children. The seat belt syndrome is characterized by a spectrum of injuries caused by the compression of the abdomen by the seat belt. It can affect the abdominal wall, hollow or solid organs, and the spine, but the association between diaphragmatic rupture and Chance fracture is extremely rare. We describe the case of a child who was involved in a car accident and who presented with multiple traumas; liver and lung injuries were first detected, and the patient was managed accordingly. During the hospital stay, a right diaphragmatic avulsion and a Chance fracture, which were initially missed, were diagnosed and treated successfully. The relevance of this case lies in the low incidence of the diaphragmatic rupture and the Chance fracture in children along with their exceptional association and in the diagnosis, which might be especially difficult in the acute setting.