A modified version of the unique cue theory accounts for olfactory compound processing in honeybees.

We investigated the capability of honeybees to discriminate between single odorants, binary olfactory mixtures, and ternary olfactory mixtures in olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex. In Experiment 1, three single odorants (A+, B+, and C+) and three binary mixtures of these odors (AB+, AC+, and BC+) were reinforced while the ternary compound, consisting of all three odors (ABC-), was nonreinforced. In Experiment 2, only one single odorant (A+) and one binary olfactory compound (BC+) were reinforced while the ternary compound (ABC-) consisting of the single odor and the binary compound was nonreinforced. We studied whether bees can solve these problems and whether the course of differentiation can be predicted by the unique cue theory, a modified unique cue theory, or Pearce's configural theory. Honeybees were not able to differentiate reinforced from nonreinforced stimuli in Experiment 1. However, summation to ABC observed at the beginning of training contradicts the predictions of Pearce's configural theory. In Experiment 2, differentiation between the single odorant A and the ternary compound developed more easily than between the binary compound BC and ABC. This pattern of differentiation is in line with a modified unique cue theory and Pearce's configural theory. Summation to ABC at the beginning of training, however, again was at odds with Pearce's configural theory. Thus, olfactory compound processing in honeybees can best be explained by a modified unique cue theory.

The impact of reinforcement density on response differentiation in configural discrimination problems.

Two human Pavlovian conditioning experiments investigated the impact of reinforcement density (the number of reinforced trials divided by the total number of trials) on discrimination learning. Experiment 1 used a negative patterning problem (A+, B+, AB-) and Experiment 2 used a positive patterning problem (A-, B-, AB+). In both experiments, reinforcement density varied across four levels. Response differentiation between reinforced and non-reinforced stimuli was linearly related to the decrease in reinforcement density. Responses to nonreinforced stimuli did not differ between the four groups in either experiment. In contrast to this, responses to reinforced stimuli were considerably more pronounced in conditions with lower reinforcement density. For negative patterning, this replicates and extends similar observations from other species. For positive patterning, this is a finding that has not yet been reported in other experiments. The results are in agreement with the comparator hypothesis (Miller & Matzel, 1988) and with Wagner's (1981) "standard operating procedures" (SOP) model.

Configural learning in human Pavlovian conditioning: acquisition of a biconditional discrimination.

Previous studies of conditioning have shown that non-human animals are able to master discrimination problems which cannot be solved on the basis of elemental associations. Most of these discrimination problems, however, have not yet been investigated in human Pavlovian conditioning. In a skin conductance conditioning experiment we therefore assessed whether humans can solve a biconditional discrimination. Participants underwent conditioning with an AB+, CD+, AD-, CB- design and successfully mastered this discrimination. Thus, they were able to learn about the relationship of specific configurations of stimuli with the reinforcer. The results extend previous findings of configural learning in humans.