Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos: Reanimación cardiopulmonar básica e instrumental / Safety in Dermatologic Procedures: Basic and Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

En el presente artículo de la serie «Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos» se aborda la reanimación cardiopulmonar básica (sin empleo de ningún dispositivo), instrumentalizada (usando un desfibrilador externo automático) y farmacológica (haciendo uso de adrenalina). Se plantean las recomendaciones actualizadas en 2021 del Consejo Europeo de Resucitación de forma resumida, con material gráfico que las sistematiza de forma estructurada (AU)

This article in the series on safety in dermatologic procedures covers the delivery of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (using no devices), instrumental resuscitation (using an automated external defibrillator), and pharmacological resuscitation (using adrenaline). We provide a brief overview of the updated 2021 European Resuscitation Council guidelines and offer an algorithm and visual aids to support recommended practices (AU)

[Translated article] Safety in Dermatologic Procedures: Basic and Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos: Reanimación cardiopulmonar básica e instrumental

This article in the series on safety in dermatologic procedures covers the delivery of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (using no devices), instrumental resuscitation (using an automated external defibrillator), and pharmacological resuscitation (using adrenaline). We provide a brief overview of the updated 2021 European Resuscitation Council guidelines and offer an algorithm and visual aids to support recommended practices (AU)

En el presente artículo de la serie «Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos» se aborda la reanimación cardiopulmonar básica (sin empleo de ningún dispositivo), instrumentalizada (usando un desfibrilador externo automático) y farmacológica (haciendo uso de adrenalina). Se plantean las recomendaciones actualizadas en 2021 del Consejo Europeo de Resucitación de forma resumida, con material gráfico que las sistematiza de forma estructurada (AU)

Safety in Dermatologic Procedures: Basic and Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. / Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos: Reanimación cardiopulmonar básica e instrumental.

This article in the series on safety in dermatologic procedures covers the delivery of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (using no devices), instrumental resuscitation (using an automated external defibrillator), and pharmacological resuscitation (using adrenaline). We provide a brief overview of the updated 2021 European Resuscitation Council guidelines and offer an algorithm and visual aids to support recommended practices.

Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos: anafilaxia, reacción vasovagal e hiperventilación / Safety in Dermatologic Procedures: Anaphylaxis, Vasovagal Reaction, and Hyperventilation

En el presente artículo de la serie «Seguridad en procedimientos dermatológicos» se aborda el diagnóstico, prevención, manejo y tratamiento de tres situaciones. Primeramente, se aborda la anafilaxia: una situación infrecuente, grave y potencialmente mortal, que requiere una identificación ágil para un manejo urgente coordinado por parte de médicos especialistas en anestesiología. En segundo lugar, la reacción vasovagal, que es la complicación médica más frecuente durante la cirugía dermatológica (una de cada 160 intervenciones), con una evolución habitualmente benigna autorresolutiva, pero que, en individuos muy sensibles, puede provocar una parada cardiaca por asistolia. En tercer y último lugar, el síndrome de hiperventilación aguda, que es una respuesta anómala de determinados individuos a un evento estresante, con un incremento de la ventilación que excede la demanda metabólica. En los tres casos se incluyen recomendaciones que se plasman de forma práctica y somera (AU)

This article, part of a the series on safety in dermatologic procedures, covers the diagnosis, prevention, management, and treatment of 3 situations or conditions. The first condition we address is anaphylaxis, an uncommon but severe and potentially fatal reaction that must be recognized quickly so that urgent management coordinated with an anesthesiologist can commence. The second is the vasovagal reaction, which is the most common complication in dermatologic surgery. This event, which occurs in 1 out of every 160 procedures, usually follows a benign course and resolves on its own. However, in patients susceptible to vasovagal reactions, syncope may lead to asystole and cardiac arrest. The third is acute hyperventilation syndrome, which is an anomalous anxiety-related increase in breathing rate beyond metabolic requirements. Brief practical recommendations for managing all 3 events are included (AU)

Safety in dermatologic procedures: anaphylaxis, vasovagal reaction, and hyperventilation.

This article, part of a the series on safety in dermatologic procedures, covers the diagnosis, prevention, management, and treatment of 3 situations or conditions. The first condition we address is anaphylaxis, an uncommon but severe and potentially fatal reaction that must be recognized quickly so that urgent management coordinated with an anesthesiologist can commence. The second is fainting due to a vasovagal reaction, which is the most common complication in dermatologic surgery. This event, which occurs in 1 out of every 160 procedures, usually follows a benign course and resolves on its own. However, in patients susceptible to vasovagal reactions, syncope may lead to asystole and cardiac arrest. The third is acute hyperventilation syndrome, which is an anomalous anxiety-related increase in breathing rate beyond metabolic requirements. Brief practical recommendations for managing all 3 events are included.

Análisis del valor predictivo de los criterios de aislamiento preventivo en una unidad de cuidados intensivos / Analysis of the predictive value of preventive isolation criteria in the intensive care unit

Objetivo Evaluar la precisión diagnóstica de los criterios empleados para detectar al paciente realmente portador de microrganismos multirresistentes (MMR). Diseño Estudio prospectivo, observacional de mayo de 2014 a mayo de 2015. Ámbito Unidad de cuidados intensivos polivalente. Pacientes Cohorte de pacientes ingresados de forma consecutiva que cumplían los siguientes criterios de aislamiento preventivo basados en el proyecto «Resistencia Zero»: hospitalización de más de 4 días en los últimos 3 meses («hospital»); antibioterapia durante una semana en el último mes («antibiótico»), pacientes institucionalizados o en contacto con cuidados sanitarios («institución o cuidado»); portador de MMR los últimos 6 meses («MMR previo»). Variables Variables demográficas, resultados de los cultivos obtenidos con presencia o no de MMR y tiempo de aislamiento. Se realizó un análisis multivariable con regresión logística múltiple entre cada uno de los factores de riesgo y el que el paciente fuera portador de MMR. Resultados Durante el periodo de estudio ingresaron 575 pacientes y cumplieron los criterios de aislamiento un 28%. De los 162 pacientes con criterios 51 (31%) eran portadores de MMR y de los que no cumplían criterios 29 (7%) sí que eran portadores. En el análisis multivariable la única variable asociada de forma independiente con el ser portador fue «MMR previo», con una OR 12,14 (IC 95%: 4,24–34,77). Conclusiones El único criterio que se asoció de forma independiente con la capacidad de detectar los pacientes con MMR al ingreso en la UCI fue haber presentado un «MMR previo». (AU)

Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the criteria used to detect patients carrying multiresistant microorganisms (MRMs). Design A prospective observational study was carried out from May 2014 to May 2015. Setting Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit. Patients A cohort of consecutively admitted patients meeting the following criteria for preventive isolation according to the “Zero Resistance” project: hospital length of stay>4 days in the last three months (“hospital”); antibiotherapy during one week in the last month (“antibiotic”); institutionalized patients or recurrent contact with healthcare (“institution or care”); MRM carrier in the last 6 months (“previous MRM”). Variables Demographic data, culture results and isolation time. A multivariate analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression between each of the risk factors and patient MRM carrier status. Results During the study period, 575 patients were admitted, of which 28% met the isolation criteria (162). Fifty-one (31%) were MRM carriers. Of the patients who did not meet the criteria, 29 (7%) were carriers. In the multivariate analysis, the only variable independently associated to carrier status was “previous MRM”, with OR=12.14 (95%CI 4.24-34.77). Conclusions The only criterion independently associated with the ability to detect patients with MRMs upon admission to the ICU was the existence of “previous MRM”. (AU)

[Analysis of the predictive value of preventive isolation criteria in the intensive care unit]. / Análisis del valor predictivo de los criterios de aislamiento preventivo en una unidad de cuidados intensivos.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the criteria used to detect patients carrying multiresistant microorganisms (MRMs). DESIGN: A prospective observational study was carried out from May 2014 to May 2015. SETTING: Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit. PATIENTS: A cohort of consecutively admitted patients meeting the following criteria for preventive isolation according to the "Zero Resistance" project: hospital length of stay>4 days in the last three months ("hospital"); antibiotherapy during one week in the last month ("antibiotic"); institutionalized patients or recurrent contact with healthcare ("institution or care"); MRM carrier in the last 6 months ("previous MRM"). VARIABLES: Demographic data, culture results and isolation time. A multivariate analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression between each of the risk factors and patient MRM carrier status. RESULTS: During the study period, 575 patients were admitted, of which 28% met the isolation criteria (162). Fifty-one (31%) were MRM carriers. Of the patients who did not meet the criteria, 29 (7%) were carriers. In the multivariate analysis, the only variable independently associated to carrier status was "previous MRM", with OR=12.14 (95%CI 4.24-34.77). CONCLUSIONS: The only criterion independently associated with the ability to detect patients with MRMs upon admission to the ICU was the existence of "previous MRM".

Identifying and managing patient-ventilator asynchrony: An international survey.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the main factors associated with proper recognition and management of patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA). DESIGN: An analytical cross-sectional study was carried out. SETTING: An international study conducted in 20 countries through an online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians, respiratory therapists, nurses and physiotherapists currently working in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to establish associations between all variables (profession, training in mechanical ventilation, type of training program, years of experience and ICU characteristics) and the ability of HCPs to correctly identify and manage 6 PVA. RESULTS: A total of 431 healthcare professionals answered a validated survey. The main factors associated to proper recognition of PVA were: specific training program in mechanical ventilation (MV) (OR 2.27; 95%CI 1.14-4.52; p=0.019), courses with more than 100h completed (OR 2.28; 95%CI 1.29-4.03; p=0.005), and the number of ICU beds (OR 1.037; 95%CI 1.01-1.06; p=0.005). The main factor influencing the management of PVA was the correct recognition of 6 PVAs (OR 118.98; 95%CI 35.25-401.58; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Identifying and managing PVA using ventilator waveform analysis is influenced by many factors, including specific training programs in MV, the number of ICU beds, and the number of recognized PVAs.

Encuesta nacional: espacio para mejorar / National survey: Room for improvement

No disponible