Acceptability and readiness to promote human papillomavirus vaccination at ages 9-10 years: a feasibility study among North Carolina clinics.

While 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in adolescents as young as age 9, providers typically recommend it at ages 11-12. Studies suggest that recommending HPV vaccination at 9 or 10 years of age could increase up-to-date vaccination by age 13, which could especially benefit rural populations with reduced access to primary health care and lower HPV vaccination coverage than urban areas. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the age-9 recommendation of HPV vaccination in rural clinics. We conducted in-depth interviews with providers and staff from two primary care clinics in central North Carolina to understand attitudes toward recommending HPV vaccination to 9- and 10-year-olds. All interviewees agreed that HPV vaccination was important for cancer prevention and should be recommended before the onset of sexual activity, agreeing that HPV vaccination could be initiated before age 11 to improve timeliness and completion of the vaccination series. However, opinions were mixed on whether HPV vaccination should be initiated as young as 9 years old. Two key informants recruited from two university-affiliated clinics described their experiences recommending HPV vaccination to 9- and 10-year-olds, including a modified vaccination schedule that promotes HPV vaccination during routine well-child visits, prior to pubertal onset, and alongside other recommended adolescent vaccines. Age-9 recommendation and administration of HPV vaccination is possible with minimal changes to current clinical practices and could increase the convenience and acceptability of HPV vaccination in under-vaccinated settings.

"It Has a Lot to Do With the Cumbersome Paperwork": Barriers and Facilitators of Center-Based Early Care and Education Program Participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program.

BACKGROUND: The Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) is a federally regulated feeding program that reimburses early care and education (ECE) programs for providing nutritious meals to low-income children. Participation in CACFP is voluntary and varies widely across states. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed barriers and facilitators of center-based ECE program participation in CACFP and identified potential strategies to promote the participation of eligible programs. DESIGN: This was a multimethod (eg, interviews, surveys, and document reviews) descriptive study. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Participants included stakeholders from 22 national and state agencies that work with ECE programs to promote CACFP, nutrition, and quality care; representatives of 17 sponsor organizations; and 140 center-based ECE program directors from Arizona, North Carolina, New York, and Texas. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Barriers, facilitators, and recommended strategies to promote CACFP that emerged from interviews were summarized with relevant illustrative quotes. Survey data were analyzed descriptively using frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: Key barriers to center-based ECE program participation in CACFP shared by participants included the cumbersome CACFP paperwork, difficulty meeting eligibility requirements, strict meal patterns, difficulties with meal counts, penalties for noncompliance, low reimbursements, inadequate ECE staff to assist with paperwork, and limited trainings. Facilitators to participation included supports provided by stakeholders and sponsors through outreach, technical assistance, and nutrition education. Potential strategies recommended to promote CACFP participation would require policy change (eg, streamlining paperwork, modifying eligibility requirements, and leniency toward noncompliance) and systems-level change (eg, more outreach and technical assistance) by stakeholders and sponsor organizations. CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholder agencies recognized the need to prioritize CACFP participation and highlighted ongoing efforts. Policy changes are needed at the national and state levels to address barriers and ensure consistent CACFP practices among stakeholders, sponsors, and ECE programs.

Acceptability and readiness to promote human papillomavirus vaccination at ages 9-10 years: A pilot study among rural North Carolina clinics.

While 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccination (HPV-9) is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in adolescents as young as age 9, providers typically recommend it at ages 11-12 per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations. Studies suggest that recommending HPV-9 at 9 or 10 years of age could increase up-to-date vaccination by age 13, which could benefit rural populations with reduced access to primary health care and lower HPV-9 coverage than urban areas. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of earlier recommendation of HPV-9 in rural clinics. We conducted in-depth interviews with providers and staff from two primary care clinics in central North Carolina, to understand attitudes toward recommending HPV-9 to 9- and 10-year-olds. All interviewees agreed that HPV-9 was important for cancer prevention and should be recommended before the onset of sexual activity, and agreed that HPV-9 could be initiated before age 11 to improve timeliness and completion of the vaccination series. However, opinions were mixed on whether it should be initiated as young as 9-years-old. Two key informants recruited from two urban clinics described their experiences recommending HPV-9 to 9- and 10-year-olds, including a modified vaccination schedule that promotes HPV-9 during routine well-child visits, prior to pubertal onset, and alongside other recommended adolescent vaccines. Earlier recommendation and administration of HPV-9 is possible with minimal changes to current clinical practices and could increase convenience and acceptability of HPV-9 in under-vaccinated settings.

Experiences pertaining to child nutrition and care provision among early care and education stakeholders, sponsors, and center directors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-method study.

Purpose: This study used multiple methods (interviews, survey) to assess experiences of stakeholders, sponsors, and center-based early care and education (ECE) program directors pertaining to child nutrition (e.g., provision of nutritious foods, mealtime practices, CACFP administration/use) and the provision of child-care (i.e., day-to-day ECE operations and programming) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Participants included stakeholders from 22 national and state agencies associated with the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) who also work to promote nutrition and quality child-care, representatives of 17 CACFP sponsor organizations, and 40 center-based ECE program directors who participated in interviews, as well as 100 ECE directors who completed surveys. Data were collected across four states. Thematic analyses of interviews and descriptive methods were used to analyze data collected. Results: Six main themes emerged from stakeholders, sponsors, and ECE program directors' focusing on: experiences during the temporary closure of several ECE programs; additional responsibilities and unanticipated expenses for ECE programs; difficulty in keeping up with constantly changing COVID-19 guidance; encounters during shifts from in-person to virtual training and monitoring; changes to nutrition practices at ECE; and the need to prioritize ECE funding. Conclusions: Findings highlight challenges and supports to ECE programs and could inform future efforts to enhance child-care quality and child nutrition in the U.S. during pandemic situations.

Facilitators and barriers to family child care home participation in the U.S. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP).

This paper describes facilitators, barriers, and potential strategies to promote participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) by family child care homes (FCCHs). This descriptive study occurred from January-May 2022 in Arizona and New York, two states with varying levels of CACFP participation. Stakeholders from three state-level CACFP-administering agencies, representatives of six sponsor organizations, and 23 FCCH providers (70% CACFP, 30% non-CACFP) participated in interviews. Facilitators of CACFP participation included the simple enrollment, technical assistance from sponsors, software provided by sponsors, and incentives from state agencies. Barriers included perceptions that CACFP paperwork would be burdensome, lack of access to sponsors, and challenges with meal pattern requirements. Recommended strategies to promote CACFP uptake included educating providers about CACFP, expanding outreach, and additional funding. Efforts to address state-level disparities in FCCH participation in CACFP are needed. This study provides some insight into policy and systems changes that could be beneficial.