Thermodynamic characterization of allosteric glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors.

Glycogen phosphorylase (GP) is a validated target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Here we describe highly potent GP inhibitors, AVE5688, AVE2865, and AVE9423. The first two compounds are optimized members of the acyl urea series. The latter represents a novel quinolone class of GP inhibitors, which is introduced in this study. In the enzyme assay, both inhibitor types compete with the physiological activator AMP and act synergistically with glucose. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) shows that the compounds strongly bind to nonphosphorylated, inactive GP (GPb). Binding to phosphorylated, active GP (GPa) is substantially weaker, and the thermodynamic profile reflects a coupled transition to the inactive (tense) conformation. Crystal structures confirm that the three inhibitors bind to the AMP site of tense state GP. These data provide the first direct evidence that acyl urea and quinolone compounds are allosteric inhibitors that selectively bind to and stabilize the inactive conformation of the enzyme. Furthermore, ITC reveals markedly different thermodynamic contributions to inhibitor potency that can be related to the binding modes observed in the cocrystal structures. For AVE5688, which occupies only the lower part of the bifurcated AMP site, binding to GPb (Kd = 170 nM) is exclusively enthalpic (Delta H = -9.0 kcal/mol, TDelta S = 0.3 kcal/mol). The inhibitors AVE2865 (Kd = 9 nM, Delta H = -6.8 kcal/mol, TDelta S = 4.2 kcal/mol) and AVE9423 (Kd = 24 nM, Delta H = -5.9 kcal/mol, TDelta S = 4.6 kcal/mol) fully exploit the volume of the binding pocket. Their pronounced binding entropy can be attributed to the extensive displacement of solvent molecules as well as to ionic interactions with the phosphate recognition site.

Requirements for specific binding of low affinity inhibitor fragments to the SH2 domain of (pp60)Src are identical to those for high affinity binding of full length inhibitors.

Results from a novel approach which uses protein crystallography for the screening of a low affinity inhibitor fragment library are analyzed by comparing the X-ray structures with bound fragments to the structures with the corresponding full length inhibitors. The screen for new phospho-tyrosine mimics binding to the SH2 domain of (pp60)src was initiated because of the limited cell penetration of phosphates. Fragments in our library typically had between 6 and 30 atoms and included compounds which had either millimolar activity in a Biacore assay or were suggested by the ab initio design program LUDI but had no measurable affinity. All identified fragments were located in the phospho-tyrosine pocket. The most promising fragments were successfully used to replace the phospho-tyrosine and resulted in novel nonpeptidic high affinity inhibitors. The significant diversity of successful fragments is reflected in the high flexibility of the phospho-tyrosine pocket. Comparison of the X-ray structures shows that the presence of the H-bond acceptors and not their relative position within the pharmacophore are essential for fragment binding and/or high affinity binding of full length inhibitors. The X-ray data show that the fragments are recognized by forming a complex H-bond network within the phospho-tyrosine pocket of SH2. No fragment structure was found in which this H-bond network was incomplete, and any uncompensated H-bond within the H-bond network leads to a significant decrease in the affinity of full length inhibitors. No correlation between affinity and fragment binding was found for these polar fragments and hence affinity-based screening would have overlooked some interesting starting points for inhibitor design. In contrast, we were unable to identify electron density for hydrophobic fragments, confirming that hydrophobic interactions are important for inhibitor affinity but of minor importance for ligand recognition. Our results suggest that a screening approach using protein crystallography is particularly useful to identify universal fragments for the conserved hydrophilic recognition sites found in target families such as SH2 domains, phosphatases, kinases, proteases, and esterases.

Principles governing the binding of a class of non-peptidic inhibitors to the SH2 domain of src studied by X-ray analysis.

A total of 11 structures of the (pp60)src SH2 domain with non-peptidic inhibitors based on the same two closely related inhibitor scaffolds were determined using X-ray crystallography. Surprisingly, the inhibitors that have an IC(50) value between 4 and 2700 nM bind in three different binding modes. Structure comparisons show that the inhibitors aim to maximize the interaction between the hydrophobic substituent and the hydrophobic pY+3 pocket. This is achieved either by an alternative binding mode of the phenyl phosphate or by including water molecules that mediate the interaction between the inhibitor scaffold and a rigid surface of the SH2 domain. The combination of the rigid pY+3 pocket and the rigid protein surface to which the scaffolds bind results in severe distance and angular restraints for putative scaffolds and their substituents. The X-ray data suggest that these restraints seem to be compensated in our system by including water molecules, thereby increasing the flexibility of the system.