Chemoprotection Across the Tumor Border: Cancer Cell Response to Doxorubicin Depends on Stromal Fibroblast Ratios and Interstitial Therapeutic Transport.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing evidence suggests that the tumor microenvironment reduces therapeutic delivery and may lead to chemotherapeutic resistance. At tumor borders, drug is convectively transported across a unique microenvironment composed of inverse gradients of stromal and tumor cells. These regions are particularly important to overall survival, as they are often missed through surgical intervention and contain many invading cells, often responsible for metastatic spread. An understanding of how cells in this tumor-border region respond to chemotherapy could begin to elucidate the role of transport and intercellular interactions in relation to chemoresistance. Here we examine the contribution of drug transport and stromal fibroblasts to breast cancer response to doxorubicin using in silico and in vitro models of the tumor-stroma interface. METHODS: 2D culture systems were utilized to determine the effects of modulated ratios of fibroblasts and cancer cells on overall cancer cell viability. A homogenous breast mimetic in vitro 3D collagen I-based hydrogel system, with drug delivered via pressure driven flow (0.5 µm/s), was developed to determine the effects of transport and fibroblasts on doxorubicin treatment efficacy. Using a novel layered tumor bulk-to-stroma transition in vitro 3D hydrogel model, ratios of MDA-MB-231s and fibroblasts were seeded in successive layers creating cellular gradients, yielding insight into region specific cancer cell viability at the tumor border. In silico models, utilizing concentration profiles developed in COMSOL Multiphysics, were optimized for time dependent viability prediction and confirmation of in vitro findings. RESULTS: In general, the addition of fibroblasts increased viability of cancer cells exposed to doxorubicin, indicating a protective effect of co-culture. More specifically, however, modulating ratios of cancer cells (MDA-MB-231):fibroblasts in 2D co-cultures, to mimic the tumor-stroma transition, resulted in a linear decrease in cancer cell viability from 77% (4:1) to 44% (1:4). Similar trends were seen in the breast-mimetic in vitro 3D collagen I-based homogenous hydrogel system. Our in vitro and in silico tumor border models indicate that MDA-MB-231s at the top of the gel, indicative of the tumor bulk, receive the greatest concentration of drug for the longest time, yet cellular death is lowest in this region. This trend is reversed for MDA-MB-231s alone. CONCLUSION: Together, our data indicate that fibroblasts are chemoprotective at lower density, resulting in less tumor death in regions of higher chemotherapy concentration. Additionally, chemotherapeutic agent transport properties can modulate this effect.

Interstitial flow differentially increases patient-derived glioblastoma stem cell invasion via CXCR4, CXCL12, and CD44-mediated mechanisms.

Glioblastoma (GBM) prognosis remains dismal due in part to the invasiveness of GBM cells. Interstitial fluid flow (IFF) has been shown to increase invasion of glioma cells in vitro through the CXCR4 receptor interacting with autologous, pericellular gradients of CXCL12 (autologous chemotaxis) or through the CD44 receptor interactions with the extracellular matrix (hyaluronan-mediated mechanotransduction). These mechanisms have not been examined together and thus we hypothesized that both mechanisms contribute to invasion in populations of cancer cells. Therefore, we examined IFF-stimulated CXCR4-, CXCL12-, and CD44-dependent invasion in patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). Using our 3D in vitro assay and correlative in vivo studies we demonstrated GSC lines show increased invasion with flow. This flow-stimulated invasion was reduced by blockade of CXCR4, CXCL12, and/or CD44, revealing that GSC invasion may be mediated simultaneously by both mechanisms. Characterization of CXCR4+, CXCL12+, and CD44+ populations in four GSC lines revealed different percentages of protein positive subpopulations for each line. We developed an agent-based model to identify the contributions of each subpopulation to flow-stimulated invasion and validated the model through comparisons with experimental blocking studies. Clinically relevant radiation therapy increased flow-stimulated invasion in one GSC line. Our agent-based model predicted that IFF-stimulated invasion is driven primarily by CXCR4+CXCL12+ populations, and, indeed our irradiated cells had an increase in this subpopulation. Together, these data indicate that different mechanisms govern the flow response across GSCs, but that within a single patient, there are subpopulations of GSCs that respond to flow via either CD44- or CXCR4-CXCL12 mechanisms.