Conservative Treatment of Parapneumonic Effusion in Children: Experience From a 10-Year Consecutive Case Series.

BACKGROUND: In children with parapneumonic effusion (PPE), it remains unclear when conservative treatment with antibiotics suffixes or when pleural drainage is needed. In this study we evaluate clinical features and outcomes of children with PPE. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre cohort study at 4 Dutch pediatric departments was performed, including patients 1-18 years treated for PPE between January 2010 and June 2020. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients were included (mean age 8.3 years, SD 4.8). 117 patients (86%) were treated conservatively and 19 (14%) underwent pleural drainage. Patients undergoing pleural drainage had mediastinal shift more frequently compared with conservatively treated patients (58 vs. 3%, difference 55%; 95% CI: 32%-77%). The same accounted for pleural septations/pockets (58 vs. 11%, difference 47%; 95% CI: 24%-70%), pleural thickening (47 vs. 4%, difference 43%; 95% CI: 20%-66%) and effusion size (median 5.9 vs. 2.7 cm; P = 0.032). Conservative management was successful in 27% of patients (4 of 15) with mediastinal shift, 54% of patients (13 of 24) with septations/pockets, 36% of patients (5 of 14) with pleural thickening, and 9% of patients (3 of 32) with effusions >3 cm, all radiological signs generally warranting pleural drainage. In patients treated conservatively, median duration of hospitalization was 5 days (IQR 4-112) compared with 19 days (IQR 15-24) in the drainage group ( P < 0.001), without significant difference in readmission rate (11 vs. 4%, difference 6%; 95% CI: -8%-21%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the greater amount of children with PPE could be treated conservatively with antibiotics only, especially in absence of mediastinal shift, pleural septations/pockets, pleural thickening or extensive effusions.

The Need for Routine Native Nephrectomy in the Workup for Kidney Transplantation in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Patients.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus if nor when a native nephrectomy should be performed in the workup for kidney transplantation in ADPKD patients. In our PKD Expertise Center, a restrictive approach is pursued in which nephrectomy is performed only in patients with severe complaints, i.e., in case of serious volume-related complaints, lack of space for the allograft, recurrent cyst infections, persistent cyst bleedings, or chronic refractory pain. We analyzed in a retrospective cohort study whether this approach is justified. METHODS: All ADPKD patients who received kidney transplantation between January 2000 and January 2019 were reviewed. Patients were subdivided into three groups: no nephrectomy (no-Nx), nephrectomy performed before (pre-Tx), or after kidney transplantation (post-Tx). Simultaneous nephrectomy together with transplantation were not performed in our center. RESULTS: 391 patients (54 ± 9 years, 55% male) were included. The majority of patients did not undergo a nephrectomy (n = 257, 65.7%). A nephrectomy was performed pre-Tx in 114 patients (29.2%). After Tx, nephrectomy was performed in only 30 patients (7.7%, median 4.4 years post-Tx). Surgery-related complication rates did not differ between both groups (38.3% pre-Tx vs. 27.0% post-Tx, p = 0.2), nor were there any differences in 10-year patient survival (74.4% pre-Tx vs. 80.7% post-Tx vs. 67.6% no-Nx, p = 0.4), as well as in 10-year death-censored graft survival (84.4% pre-Tx vs. 85.5% post-Tx vs. 90.0% no-Nx, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that with a restrictive nephrectomy policy in the workup for kidney transplantation, only a part of ADPKD patients need a native nephrectomy.