Need for standardization in the use of structures in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning of head and neck cancers, a GORTEC study.

BACKGROUND: Most radiotherapy structures contoured on CT scans during IMRT planning are defined by the ICRU, forming part of standard practice. Associated dose-volume constraints serve as parameters for dose computation algorithms to produce optimized dose maps. On the ground, however, physicists/dosimetrists routinely delineate auxiliary "non-standard" radiotherapy structures (nsRS). MATERIALS/METHODS: From 287 patients' data, five categories of nsRS were identified. Inter-center, inter-patient variability, and temporal trends in nsRS use were investigated. Relation of nsRS with topological complexity, plan quality, calculated quality assurance (QA) and expert QA, was investigated using machine learning classification. RESULTS: nsRS accounted for 19.2% of all structures. Average number of nsRS per patient was 8.92 ± 6.70. Variation coefficient across centers was > 70% for nsRS frequency. There was no effect of patient volume per center on averaged nsRS number between low, intermediate, and high-volume centers. No temporal trends in nsRS use were detected at the high-volume centers, except for an increase in 'forced-dose' nsRS (p = 3.08 × (10)^(-5)) at one center. Machine learning prediction accuracy including nsRS features were 0.70 ± 0.06 for topological complexity, 0.58 ± 0.05 for calculated QA and 0.72 ± 0.05 for expert QA. CONCLUSION: Use of nsRS is frequent but heterogeneous and should be standardized further in line with ICRU initiatives in IMRT planning. Use of nsRS should be documented with respect to the need for nsRS from dose computation algorithms of treatment planning systems and IMRT machines in terms of modulation capacity and plan robustness.

Assessing Interobserver Variability in the Delineation of Structures in Radiation Oncology: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: The delineation of target volumes and organs at risk is the main source of uncertainty in radiation therapy. Numerous interobserver variability (IOV) studies have been conducted, often with unclear methodology and nonstandardized reporting. We aimed to identify the parameters chosen in conducting delineation IOV studies and assess their performances and limits. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a systematic literature review to highlight major points of heterogeneity and missing data in IOV studies published between 2018 and 2021. For the main used metrics, we did in silico analyses to assess their limits in specific clinical situations. RESULTS: All disease sites were represented in the 66 studies examined. Organs at risk were studied independently of tumor site in 29% of reviewed IOV studies. In 65% of studies, statistical analyses were performed. No gold standard (GS; ie, reference) was defined in 36% of studies. A single expert was considered as the GS in 21% of studies, without testing intraobserver variability. All studies reported both absolute and relative indices, including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) in 68% and the Hausdorff distance (HD) in 42%. Limitations were shown in silico for small structures when using the DSC and dependence on irregular shapes when using the HD. Variations in DSC values were large between studies, and their thresholds were inconsistent. Most studies (51%) included 1 to 10 cases. The median number of observers or experts was 7 (range, 2-35). The intraclass correlation coefficient was reported in only 9% of cases. Investigating the feasibility of studying IOV in delineation, a minimum of 8 observers with 3 cases, or 11 observers with 2 cases, was required to demonstrate moderate reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of future IOV studies would benefit from a more standardized methodology: clear definitions of the gold standard and metrics and a justification of the tradeoffs made in the choice of the number of observers and number of delineated cases should be provided.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and systemic treatments for extracerebral oligometastases, oligorecurrence, oligopersistence and oligoprogression from lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic irradiation (SBRT) is a standard of care for inoperable stage I lung cancer and brain oligometastases from lung cancer but is controversial for extracranial oligometastases. We assessed outcomes of lung cancer patients with extracranial metastases in oligometastatic, oligorecurrent, oligopersistent and oligoprogressive settings ("oligometastatic spectrum") under strategies using SBRT +/- systemic treatments. METHODS: A retrospective multicentric study of consecutive lung cancer adult patients with 1-5 extracranial metastases treated with SBRT was conducted. RESULTS: Of 91 patients (99 metastases, median age 63, 64.8% adenocarcinomas, 19.8% molecular alterations), 11% had oligometastases, 49.5% oligorecurrence, 19.8% oligopersistence and 19.8% oligoprogression. Of 36% of patients under systemic treatments at initiation of SBRT, systemic treatment interruption was performed in 58% of them. With median follow up of 15.3 months, crude local control at irradiated metastases was 91%, while median distant progression-free survival (dPFS) and overall survival were 6.3 and 28.4 months (2-year survival 54%). Initial nodal stage and oligometastatic spectrum were prognostic factors for dPFS; age, initial primary stage and oligometastatic spectrum were prognostic factors for survival on multivariate analysis. Patients with oncogene-addicted tumors more frequently had oligoprogressive disease. Repeat ablative irradiations were preformed in 80% of patients who had oligorelapses. Worst acute toxicities consisted of 5.5% and one late toxic death occurred. CONCLUSION: The oligometastatic spectrum is a strong prognosticator in patients undergoing SBRT for extracranial metastases. Median survival was over two years but dPFS was about 6 months. Continuation of systemic therapy in oligoprogressive patients should be investigated.

Impact of suboptimal tandem implantation on local control and complications in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervix cancer.

PURPOSE: Correct tandem implantation for cervix cancer intracavitary brachytherapy may be challenging. We investigated whether suboptimal implantation can be related to patient and disease characteristics and may result in subsequent underutilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive cervix cancer patients referred for intracavitary brachytherapy after external beam radiation therapy performed in several general hospitals from 2013 to 2017 were included. RESULTS: In 172 patients having 301 procedures, 95 implantations were suboptimal (15% inadequate tandem insertions, 10% subserosal insertion, and 6% uterine perforation on postimplant CT scan). Risk factors were age, myometrium invasion, and uterine retroversion. Median followup was 21 months. Three-year local control and survival rates were 72% and 85%, respectively. Forty-seven patients (27%) failed to receive brachytherapy. Failure to perform brachytherapy was associated with poorer local control (OR = 0.34 [0.17-0.67], p = 0.001). By contrast, suboptimal implantation did not increase local failure or toxicity rates in patients undergoing brachytherapy. No peritoneal carcinomatosis occurred after uterine perforation in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal implantation was frequent. In the absence of image guidance during implantation, conversion to other treatment modalities (including external beam radiation therapy) due to insertion difficulties resulted in worse local control. With optimization, however, suboptimal brachytherapy implantation did not result in suboptimal dose coverage or poorer local control. Failure to perform a brachytherapy boost correlates with increased local failure risk in patients with cervix cancer, whereas tandem malposition does not. Real-time intraoperative ultrasound guidance may be useful to reduce uterine perforation rates and thus increase brachytherapy use.

Study of commercial detector responses in non-equilibrium small photon fields of a 1000MU/min CyberKnife system.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the detector responses in non-equilibrium small photon fields. METHODS: Five detectors (PTW 31014 ionization chamber, PTW 60016, PTW 60017 and Sun Nuclear EDGE diodes and PTW 60003 diamond detector) and one passive dosimeter (Harshaw micro-LiF) as well as a 1000MU/min CyberKnife were modeled with the PENELOPE Monte Carlo code. Field factors, [Formula: see text] were calculated and perturbations due to volume averaging effect, active material effect and coating effect were quantified for the five detectors and passive dosimeter. RESULTS: The PTW 31014 ionization chamber under-response is mainly due to the fluence perturbation caused by the presence of air as detecting material. Regarding diodes, the high density materials used in their active volume and in their coating is responsible for their over-response. Regarding the PTW 60003 diamond, its under-response for the 5mm field size is due to a large volume averaging effect whereas for largest field sizes a nearly perfect compensation between the volume averaging effect and the material effect due to the diamond density occurs. Despite its small size, a volume averaging effect was observed for the micro-LiF for the 5mm field size. CONCLUSION: Perturbations due to volume averaging effect, active material effect and coating effect were investigated and quantified for five active detectors. Since these perturbations can cause opposite effects, wrong conclusions may be drawn regarding the radiological water-equivalence of detectors. Thus, we recommend performing such a study for each novel detector available on the market.

Clinical relevance of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography of the neck and thorax in postablation (131)I scintigraphy for thyroid cancer.

CONTEXT: In patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma, postablation (131)I scintigraphy aims to detect residual neck disease and distant metastases, usually found in lungs and bones. New hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT-CT) cameras that permit functional and anatomical image fusion may improve its clinical relevance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the added value of neck and thorax SPECT-spiral CT to whole-body scan (WBS) in postablation (131)I scintigraphy. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a single-referral-center prospective study with a median follow-up of 21 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postablation (131)I WBS and neck and thorax SPECT-CT were performed in 55 consecutive patients treated in 2006. WBS and SPECT-CT data were blindly reviewed, scored negative (benign), positive (malignant), or indeterminate and were correlated to the patient outcome. RESULTS: At patient level, WBS and SPECT-CT were negative in 67 and 78% of patients, positive in 4 and 15%, and indeterminate in 29 and 7%, respectively. Overall, nine patients (16%) presented treatment failure (persistent or recurrent disease) 1-16 months after radioiodine ablation. In the 16 patients with indeterminate WBS, negative SPECT-CT ruled out suspicion of disease in nine of nine patients, and positive SPECT-CT confirmed malignant lesions in four of five patients. Positive SPECT-CT predicted treatment failure better than positive WBS (McNemar's test, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the complementary role of neck and thorax SPECT-CT to WBS in postablation (131)I scintigraphy. Because SPECT-CT allows one to confirm or to rule out residual disease in most cases where WBS remains indeterminate, we recommend its use when available.