Green radiology: How to develop sustainable radiology.

The phenomenon of global warming due to the increased emission of greenhouse gases makes it necessary to raise public awareness about the importance of promoting sustainable practices. The field of radiology is not an exception, as it consumes a large amount of energy and resources to operate equipment and generate images. Green radiology is a sustainable, innovative, and responsible approach in radiology practice that focuses on minimizing the negative environmental effects of the technologies and procedures used in radiology. Its primary goal is to reduce the carbon, water and ecological footprint in our services based on four strategic pillars: decreasing energy, water, and helium usage; properly recycling and/or disposing of waste and residues (including contrast media); minimizing the environmental impact of ionizing radiation; and promoting eco-friendly radiology practices.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, what does the interventional radiologist and vascular surgeon need from our report?

Abdominal aortic aneurysm is defined as a dilatation of the abdominal aorta greater than 3cm. Its prevalence is between 1 and 1.5 cases per 100 people, constituting an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Rare in women, its frequency increases with age and its most frequent location is between the renal arteries and the aorto-iliac bifurcation. Approximately 5% of cases will involve the visceral branches. It is a silent pathological process whose natural evolution is rupture, which often has a fatal outcome and whose diagnosis is part of the pathology that we will find in emergency radiology. The involvement of the radiologist and the preparation of an accurate diagnostic report, as soon as possible, is essential for decision-making by the team in charge of the patient's surgery.

Occupational radiation and pregnancy: reality or disinformation? A review of the literature and summary of current clinical guidelines.

Exposure to ionizing radiation is a decisive factor in women's choice of entering the field of interventional radiology. This issue explains the low percentage of women in interventional radiology and the high number of women who take leave from work when they are pregnant even though they have no problems with their pregnancy. The current guidelines and legal framework regarding pregnancy and ionizing radiation from different national institutions are not in line with the scientific evidence. They establish recommendations based on disinformation and a need to protect the fetus that has not been scientifically validated. Lack of knowledge and lack of evidence-based information could contribute to gender-based inequality at work. This article reviews the evidence from the articles and clinical guidelines in PubMed, paying special attention to publications from the last five years (2015-2020). Additionally, it reports the results of an online survey of healthcare professionals exposed to radiation in their work.

Radiación ocupacional y embarazo: realidad o desinformación. Revisión en la literatura y actualización según guías clínicas vigentes / Occupational radiation and pregnancy: reality or disinformation? A review of the literature and summary of current clinical guidelines

La exposición a radiaciones ionizantes es un factor condicionante a la hora de elegir radiología vascular intervencionista, lo que justifica el bajo porcentaje de radiólogas dedicadas a ello y el elevado número de bajas en trabajadoras embarazadas de servicios de radiodiagnóstico sin patología gestacional. Las recomendaciones y actual legislación sobre embarazo y manejo de radiaciones ionizantes de las diferentes instituciones nacionales no se ajustan a evidencias científicas, estableciendo medidas de protección basadas en desinformación y una protección injustificada al feto cuya validez no se ha demostrado científicamente. El desconocimiento y falta de información basada en evidencias podría ser una causa de esta disparidad laboral relacionada con el género de los trabajadores.Se realiza una revisión en la base de datos PubMed de los artículos y guías de práctica clínica más relevantes, con especial atención a los publicados en los últimos 5 años (2015-2020), y se describen los resultados de una encuesta online realizada a trabajadores sanitarios expuestos.(AU)

Exposure to ionizing radiation is a decisive factor in women's choice of entering the field of interventional radiology. This issue explains the low percentage of women in interventional radiology and the high number of women who take leave from work when they are pregnant even though they have no problems with their pregnancy. The current guidelines and legal framework regarding pregnancy and ionizing radiation from different national institutions are not in line with the scientific evidence. They establish recommendations based on disinformation and a need to protect the fetus that has not been scientifically validated. Lack of knowledge and lack of evidence-based information could contribute to gender-based inequality at work.This article reviews the evidence from the articles and clinical guidelines in PubMed, paying special attention to publications from the last five years (2015-2020). Additionally, it reports the results of an online survey of healthcare professionals exposed to radiation in their work.(AU)