Prevalence of visceral leishmaniasis among people with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leishmaniasis is a parasitic infection expressing different clinical phenotypes. Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is considered an opportunistic infection among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The objective of this review was to identify published data on the prevalence of Leishmania spp. infection among PWH and to define particular determinants that affect critically the epidemiological characteristics of VL-HIV coinfection and, potentially, its burden on public health. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic literature search until June 30, 2022. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to calculate the summary prevalence and respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) of leishmaniasis among PWH. Meta-regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of putative effect modifiers, such as the mean CD4 cell count, on the major findings. Thirty-four studies were eligible, yielding a summary prevalence of 6% (95%CI, 4-11%) for leishmaniasis (n = 1583) among PWH (n = 85,076). Higher prevalence rates were noted in Asia (17%, 95%CI, 9-30%) and America (9%, 95%CI, 5-17%) than in Europe (4%, 95%CI, 2-8%). Prevalence rates were significantly mediated by the age, sex, and CD4 cell count of participants. Heterogeneity remained significant in all meta-analyses (p < 0.0001). In the majority of included studies, people were coinfected with HIV and Leishmania species associated with VL, as opposed to those associated with cutaneous leishmaniasis. No sign of publication bias was shown (p = 0.06). Our summary of published studies on leishmaniasis among PWH is important to provide prevalence estimates and define potential underlying factors that could guide researchers to generate and further explore specific etiologic hypotheses.

Antitumor activity without on-target off-tumor toxicity of GD2-chimeric antigen receptor T cells in patients with neuroblastoma.

The reprogramming of a patient's immune system through genetic modification of the T cell compartment with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has led to durable remissions in chemotherapy-refractory B cell cancers. Targeting of solid cancers by CAR-T cells is dependent on their infiltration and expansion within the tumor microenvironment, and thus far, fewer clinical responses have been reported. Here, we report a phase 1 study (NCT02761915) in which we treated 12 children with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma with escalating doses of second-generation GD2-directed CAR-T cells and increasing intensity of preparative lymphodepletion. Overall, no patients had objective clinical response at the evaluation point +28 days after CAR-T cell infusion using standard radiological response criteria. However, of the six patients receiving ≥108/meter2 CAR-T cells after fludarabine/cyclophosphamide conditioning, two experienced grade 2 to 3 cytokine release syndrome, and three demonstrated regression of soft tissue and bone marrow disease. This clinical activity was achieved without on-target off-tumor toxicity. Targeting neuroblastoma with GD2 CAR-T cells appears to be a valid and safe strategy but requires further modification to promote CAR-T cell longevity.

Volumetric assessment of tumor size changes in pediatric low-grade gliomas: feasibility and comparison with linear measurements.

PURPOSE: We report a retrospective comparison between bi-dimensional RANO criteria and manual volumetric segmentation (MVS) in pediatric low-grade gliomas. METHODS: MRI FLAIR or T1 post contrast images were used for assessment of tumor response. Seventy patients were included in this single center study, for each patient two scans were assessed ("time 0" and "end of therapy") and response to therapy was evaluated for both methods. Inter-reader variability and average time for volumetric assessment were also calculated. RESULTS: Fourteen (20%) of the 70 patients had discordant results in terms of response assessment between the bi-dimensional measurements and MVS. All volumetric response assessments were in keeping with the subjective analysis of tumor (radiology report). Of the 14 patients, 6 had stable disease (SD) on MVS and progressive disease (PD) on 2D assessment, 5 patients had SD on MVS and partial response (PR) on 2D assessment, 2 patients had PD on MVS and SD on 2D assessment, and 1 patient had PR on MVS and SD on 2D analysis. The number of discordant results rises to 21(30%) if minor response is integrated in the response assessment. MVS was relatively fast and showed high inter-reader concordance. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that therapeutic response classification may change in a significant number of children by performing a volumetric tumor assessment. Furthermore, MVS is not particularly time consuming and has very good inter-reader concordance.