Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard technique for gallbladder diseases in both acute and elective surgery. Nevertheless, reports from national surveys still seem to represent some doubts regarding its diffusion. There is neither a wide consensus on its indications nor on its possible related morbidity. On the other hand, more than 25 years have passed since the introduction of LC, and we have all witnessed the exponential growth of knowledge, skill and technology that has followed it. In 1995, the EAES published its consensus statement on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in which seven main questions were answered, according to the available evidence. During the following 20 years, there have been several additional guidelines on LC, mainly focused on some particular aspect, such as emergency or concomitant biliary tract surgery. METHODS: In 2012, several Italian surgical societies decided to revisit the clinical recommendations for the role of laparoscopy in the treatment of gallbladder diseases in adults, to update and supplement the existing guidelines with recommendations that reflect what is known and what constitutes good practice concerning LC.

[Prognostic value of splenectomy and lymph-node dissection during gastric cancer resection]. / Il ruolo prognostico di splenectomia e linfoadenectoma nella chirurgia del carcinoma gastrico.

Gastric carcinoma is the second most common cause of digestive tumour-related death in Europe, North America and Asia. Today, the gold standard of treatment is still surgery, but outcomes to date are unsatisfactory. The Japanese Society for Research in Gastric Cancer (JSRGC) recommends the routine execution of splenectomy during gastrectomy. This recommendation is contested by western Authors because of increased morbidity and mortality without any real advantage in terms of survival. Patients treated for gastric cancer in our department between 1993 and 2002 were selected for this study. The 132 patients recruited were divided into two groups: a) those treated for gastric cancer without splenectomy; and b) those in whom splenectomy was performed in conjunction with gastrectomy. We analysed: the extent of lymph node dissection, the execution of the splenectomy, and the prognostic importance of factors relating to the patient, tumour and surgeon. Splenectomy was not associated with any increase in morbidity. Complications, especially of the septic type, and perioperative mortality were similar in both groups, and the same was true of survival at both 3 and 5 years. In our opinion, splenectomy should not be routinely combined with surgery for gastric cancer but could be considered for T3-T4 neoplasms or those localized in the upper two thirds of the stomach.