RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a frequent intervention with a high economic impact. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the resource use and cost of PCI in Mexico where heart disease is a leading cause of death, and a large segment of the population does not have formal healthcare coverage. METHODS: This retrospective observational study obtained resource utilization data from patient files and itemized costs from the pharmacy registry at the National Institute of Cardiology. Patients were aged >18 years, diagnosed with ACS, and treated with PCI and secondary prophylaxis with aspirin plus clopidogrel or prasugrel. Patients had a follow-up of >12 months at the institute. Statistical analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: The sample included 156 patients (mean age: 58.66 years; male: 77.9%). Patients were diagnosed with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina 64.9%, 27.2%, and 7.9%, respectively. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) total medical cost was estimated to be $145 677 ($98 326) Mexican pesos 2018. The highest category of spending was surgical materials (mean [SD]: $47 834 [$32 569], comprising 32.8% of total costs); medications and access to the operating room represented 14.2% and 11.8%, respectively. Mean (SD) hospital stay was 9.07 (6.2) days; for the 11.5% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit, the mean (SD) stay was 4.61 (2.06) days. The mean cost of standard hospitalization was $12 572, or 8.6% of spending; intensive care unit hospitalization comprised 17.7% of total costs (mean: $25 802). The cost of the intervention is subsidized up to 95% for patients with a low social economic status, with the exception of surgical materials such as stents. This results in the highest burden component of the intervention being placed on the patient and not the institute. CONCLUSION: The mean cost per patient shows that PCI is an expensive procedure in Mexico. A lack of subsidies for surgical equipment places a high economic burden on the patient and represents a barrier of access for a vulnerable population that likely increases mortality and morbidity rates in those patients unable to pay for treatment and a potential high burden of debt for those who do pay.
