Effects of the androgen receptor inhibitor enzalutamide on the pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir and tenofovir: a case report.

ABSTRACT: Enzalutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor used for the treatment of prostate cancer. Although enzalutamide causes a favorable adverse effect profile, it might cause drug-drug interactions with some antiretrovirals. No major differences on the main dolutegravir and tenofovir pharmokinetocs were observed in this case report when comparing baseline assessments with those following the introduction of enzalutamide, also when given at higher doses, in a 63-year-old male living with HIV and prostate cancer.

Comparative Population Pharmacokinetics of Darunavir in SARS-CoV-2 Patients vs. HIV Patients: The Role of Interleukin-6.

BACKGROUND: Darunavir is an anti-HIV protease inhibitor repurposed for SARS-CoV-2 treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the population pharmacokinetics of darunavir in SARS-CoV-2 patients compared with HIV patients. METHODS: Two separate models were created by means of a nonlinear mixed-effect approach. The influence of clinical covariates on each basic model was tested and the association of significant covariates with darunavir parameters was assessed at multivariate regression and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses. Monte Carlo simulation assessed the influence of covariates on the darunavir concentration versus time profile. RESULTS: A one-compartment model well-described darunavir concentrations in both groups. In SARS-CoV-2 patients (n = 30), interleukin (IL)-6 and body surface area were covariates associated with darunavir oral clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (Vd), respectively; no covariates were identified in HIV patients (n = 25). Darunavir CL/F was significantly lower in SARS-CoV-2 patients compared with HIV patients (4.1 vs. 10.3 L/h; p < 0.001). CART analysis found that an IL-6 level of 18 pg/mL may split the SARS-CoV-2 population in patients with low versus high darunavir CL/F (mean ± standard deviation 3.47 ± 1.90 vs. 8.03 ± 3.24 L/h; proportion of reduction in error = 0.46). Median (interquartile range) darunavir CL/F was significantly lower in SARS-CoV-2 patients with IL-6 levels ≥ 18 pg/mL than in SARS-CoV-2 patients with IL-6 levels < 18 pg/mL or HIV patients (2.78 [2.16-4.47] vs. 7.24 [5.88-10.38] vs. 9.75 [8.45-13.79] L/h, respectively; p < 0.0001). Increasing IL-6 levels affected darunavir concentration versus time simulated profiles. We hypothesized that increases in IL-6 levels associated with severe SARS-CoV-2 disease may downregulate the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-mediated metabolism of darunavir. CONCLUSIONS: This is a proof-of-concept of SARS-CoV-2 disease-drug interactions, and may support the need for optimal dose selection of sensitive CYP3A4 substrates in severe SARS-CoV-2 patients.

Immunological profiles of HIV-positive recipients of liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Scarce data are available about immune cell frequencies in HIV-positive recipients of liver transplant. Alterations in immune subsets can lead to persistent immune activation and disease progression or reduced HIV-specific responses. In liver transplantation, impaired immune tolerance can lead to organ rejection. METHODS: HIV-positive subjects with undetectable HIVRNA and CD4 > 100/mm3 were included. Control groups were non-transplanted HIV-positive patients with similar immunovirological parameters and healthy subjects. B cells (memory, transitional, and mature subsets), T cells (effector TH1, nonclassic TH1, TH17, TH1/17; T regulatory naïve and effector subsets and CD8+ T regulatory cells), and NK cells (CD56dim and CD56bright subsets) were analyzed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients, including 14 HIV-positive transplant recipients (HIV-LT), 14 HIV-positive controls, and 28 healthy controls were included. Median age of HIV-LT patients was 54.9 years with median time from transplant of 7.6 years. Eleven (79%) were HIV/HCV coinfected. Compared to nontransplanted patients, HIV-LT displayed significantly increased frequency of T CD8+ cells, lower percentage of T CD4+ cell, and lower number of nonclassic TH1, TH1/17 cells and naïve T CD4+ regulatory cells (Tregs). Healthy controls showed increased numbers of B cell subsets and decreased percentage of T effector subpopulations compared to HIV-LT. Compared to HIV-positive patients, healthy controls had higher B cells, NK cells, CD4+ T cells, naïve CD4+ Tregs but lower CD8+ T cells, effector Tregs, CD8+ Tregs, and all T effector cell subsets. CONCLUSIONS: Immune cell subpopulations potentially associated with HIV progression and organ rejection were detected in HIV-positive transplant recipients. We confirmed altered frequencies of B, T, and NK cell populations in HIV-positive liver transplant recipients compared to healthy controls. The imbalance among immune cell subsets deserves further studies to identify markers of transplant outcome and potential therapeutic targets.

Impact of new treatment options for hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplantation.

Liver transplant candidates and recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease greatly benefit from an effective antiviral therapy. The achievement of a sustained virological response before transplantation can prevent the recurrence of post-transplant HCV disease that occurs universally and correlates with enhanced progression to graft cirrhosis. Previous standard-of-care regimens (e.g., pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin with or without first generation protease inhibitors, boceprevir and telaprevir) displayed suboptimal results and poor tolerance in liver transplant recipients. A new class of potent direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) characterized by all-oral regimens with minimal side effects has been approved and included in the recent guidelines for the treatment of liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV disease. Association of sofosbuvir with ribavirin and/or ledipasvir is recommended in liver transplant recipients and patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Other regimens include simeprevir, daclatasvir, and combination of other DAA. Possible interactions should be monitored, especially in coinfected human immunodeficiency virus/HCV patients receiving antiretrovirals.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between everolimus and antifungal triazoles in a liver transplant patient.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of a pharmacokinetic interaction between azole antifungals (fluconazole and voriconazole) and everolimus in a patient who underwent an orthotopic liver transplant. CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-old male who received an orthotopic liver transplant experienced an iatrogenic retroperitoneal duodenal perforation on postoperative day 55. His condition was subsequently complicated by severe sepsis and acute renal failure. Intravenous fluconazole 400 mg, followed by 100 mg every 24 hours according to impaired renal function, was immediately started; to avoid further nephrotoxicity, immunosuppressant therapy was switched from cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil to oral everolimus 0.75 mg every 12 hours. Satisfactory steady-state minimum concentration (C(min)) of everolimus was achieved (approximately 5 ng/mL). On day 72 posttransplant, because of invasive aspergillosis, antifungal therapy was switched to intravenous voriconazole 400 mg every 12 hours on the first day, followed by 200 mg every 12 hours; to prevent drug toxicity, the everolimus dosage was promptly lowered to 0.25 mg every 24 hours. At that time, the everolimus C(min) averaged approximately 3 ng/mL. The concentration/dose ratio of everolimus (ie, C(min) reached at steady-state for each milligram per kilogram of drug administered) was markedly lower during fluconazole versus voriconazole cotreatment (mean +/- SD, 3.49 +/- 0.29 vs 11.05 +/- 0.81 ng/mL per mg/kg/daily; p < 0.001). Despite intensive care, the patient's condition continued to deteriorate and he died on day 84 posttransplant. DISCUSSION: Both azole antifungals were considered probable causative agents of an interaction with everolimus according to the Drug Interaction Probability Scale. The interaction is due to the inhibition of CYP3A4-mediated everolimus clearance. Of note, prompt reduction of the everolimus dosage since the first azole coadministration, coupled with intensive therapeutic drug monitoring, represented a useful strategy to prevent drug overexposure. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that during everolimus-azole cotreatment, a dose reduction of everolimus is needed to avoid overexposure. According to the different inhibitory potency of CYP3A4 activity, the reduction should be lower during fluconazole than during voriconazole cotreatment.

Drop in trough blood concentrations of tacrolimus after switching from nelfinavir to fosamprenavir in four HIV-infected liver transplant patients.

Solid organ transplantation in HIV-infected individuals requires concomitant use of immunosuppressants and antiretrovirals that may cause significant drug interactions. Here we report on a peculiar pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and protease inhibitors (PIs) which occurred in four HIV-infected liver transplant patients who had to shift PI therapy from nelfinavir to fosamprenavir as a consequence of regulatory restrictions. After the switch, tacrolimus trough blood concentrations significantly dropped in all patients (mean +/- SD 6.9 +/- 2.6 versus 3.2 +/- 2.0 ng/ml before and after the switch, respectively; P=0.01), so that a marked dosage increase was needed (0.29 +/- 0.14 versus 0.88 +/- 0.48 mg/day, 1-3 days before and 3 weeks after the switch, respectively; P=0.046) to attain the desired target (8.7 +/- 2.3 ng/ml). Consistently, marked changes of the concentration/dose ratio of tacrolimus were observed in all cases (27.2 +/- 9.7 ng/ml per mg/kg/day versus 9.7 +/- 4.0 ng/ml per mg/kg/day before and after the switch, respectively; P<0.001). Our findings suggest that fosamprenavir may be less potent than nelfinavir in inhibiting tacrolimus clearance and support the need for higher tacrolimus dosage to avoid insufficient immunosuppression in HIV-infected liver transplant patients when switching from nelfinavir to fosamprenavir or even when directly starting antiretroviral therapy with fosamprenavir.

Human granulocytic anaplasmosis in northeastern Italy.

Sporadic cases of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) have been reported in areas with a high prevalence of tick-borne diseases (TBDs) in Europe. We aimed at estimating the sero-prevalence of A. phagocytophilum and other TBDs in northeastern Italy in outpatients with a history of recent tick bite or suspected TBD. In the 1-year study, 79 patients were enrolled and 30 (38%) received a diagnosis of TBD: 24 (30%) with Lyme disease and 5 (6%) with HGE. Our findings indicate the presence of HGA in northeastern Italy; so, since co-infection with Lyme disease appeared to be frequent, physicians assessing patients after a tick bite should consider HGA in the diagnosis.