Supinator to Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer to Restore Finger Flexion in Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Injury.

PURPOSE: Restoration of pinch and grasp is a chief concern of patients with cervical spinal cord injury or peripheral nerve injury involving the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN). We hypothesize that supinator nerve-to-AIN (Sup-AIN) nerve transfer is a viable option for AIN neurotization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who received Sup-AIN. Reported outcomes included Medical Research Council strength of the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus and passive range of digit motion. Patients with <12 months of follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent Sup-AIN, eight with peripheral nerve injury, and three with spinal cord injury. Three patients were excluded because of insufficient follow-up. Average follow-up was 17 months (range: 12-25 months). Six patients had M4 recovery (75%), one patient had M3 recovery (12.5%), and one did not recover function because of severe stiffness (12.5%). We observed no complications or donor site morbidity in our patients. CONCLUSIONS: The Sup-AIN nerve transfer is an effective option to restore digital flexion in patients with peripheral nerve injury or spinal cord injury involving the AIN motor distribution. In comparison to previously described extensor carpi radialis brevis to AIN and brachialis to AIN nerve transfers, Sup-AIN offers the benefits of a more expendable donor nerve and shorter regenerative distance, respectively. The one failed Sup-AIN in our series highlights the importance of patient selection. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Nerve-Targeted Surgical Treatments for Spasticity: A Narrative Review.

Spasticity is a potentially debilitating symptom of various acquired and congenital neurologic pathologies that, without adequate treatment, may lead to long-term disability, compromise functional independence, and negatively impact mental health. Several conservative as well as non-nerve targeted surgical strategies have been developed for the treatment of spasticity, but these may be associated with significant drawbacks, such as adverse side effects to medication, device dependence on intrathecal baclofen pumps, and inadequate relief with tendon-based procedures. In these circumstances, patients may benefit from nerve-targeted surgical interventions such as (i) selective dorsal rhizotomy, (ii) hyperselective neurectomy, and (iii) nerve transfer. When selecting the appropriate surgical approach, preoperative patient characteristics, as well as the risks and benefits of nerve-targeted surgical intervention, must be carefully evaluated. Here, we review the current evidence on the efficacy of these nerve-targeted surgical approaches for treating spasticity across various congenital and acquired neurologic pathologies.

Surgical Technique: Brachioradialis to Extensor Carpi Radialis Longus and Brevis Nerve Transfers for Tetraplegia.

Improving upper extremity function in high cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) patients with tetraplegia is a challenging task owing to the limited expendable donor muscles and nerves that are available. Restoring active wrist extension for these patients is critical because it allows for tenodesis grasp. This is classically achieved with brachioradialis (BR) to extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon transfer, but outcomes are suboptimal because BR excursion is insufficient and its origin proximal to the elbow further limits the functionality of the tendon transfer, particularly in the absence of elbow extension. As an alternative approach to restore wrist extension in patients with ICSHT group 1 SCI, we present the first clinical report of the BR to extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) and BR to ECRB nerve transfers.