Alcohol-related expectancies and assaults among injured drinkers in the emergency department setting.

This study examined the extent to which alcohol-related expectancies were associated with assaults among 278 injured drinkers in the emergency department setting. Results of logistic regression analyses indicated that patients who were male, had high blood alcohol levels and who expected alcohol to make them more careless were more likely to report being assaulted. Conversely, among males, patients who expected to become more powerful and aggressive when drinking were less likely to be assaulted. These findings suggest that helping patients understand how expectancies surrounding alcohol use shape drinking and its behavioral concomitants may circumvent their risk for future assaults.

Adverse drinking consequences among alcohol abusing intravenous drug users.

BACKGROUND: Heavy alcohol use is common among out-of-treatment injection drug users (IDUs); however, the relationship between alcohol and drug use behaviors in codependent populations is not well understood. Our specific objectives were (1) to describe the psychometric properties of the Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC) in a sample of active IDUs, and (2) to compare DrInC scores of active IDUs with those reported for the alcohol treatment seeking sample on which the instrument was developed. METHODS: Interview data were collected from 187 active IDUs who scored positively (> or = 8) on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, who were recruited from a Providence, RI, needle exchange program (1998-1999). DrInC total and subscale scores for the 159 (85%) participants who met DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse/dependence were analyzed. Six-month follow-up data were used to estimate test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The DrInC total scale exhibited high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. With the exception of adverse physical consequences, reliability estimates for DrInC subscales were good to very good. These data indicate higher subscale redundancy than reported for the development sample. Active IDUs had significantly higher adverse impulse control consequences than the alcohol treatment seeking population on which the instrument was developed. CONCLUSIONS: The DrInC exhibits desirable psychometric properties for assessing adverse drinking consequences in active IDU populations. IDUs who met DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse/dependence reported overall levels of adverse drinking consequences comparable with non-IDU alcohol treatment populations but were more likely to exhibit adverse impulse control consequences.

Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for injured drinkers in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to test whether a brief motivational intervention, with or without a booster session, would improve drinking-related outcomes more than standard Emergency Department (ED) treatment. METHOD: The study population consisted of 539 (78% male) injured patients treated in the ED and discharged to the community following their treatment. Injured patients met inclusion criteria if they were assessed as hazardous or harmful drinkers by scoring eight or more on the AUDIT and/or having alcohol in their system at the time of their injury or ED visit. Patients were randomly assigned to either standard care (SC), brief intervention (BI) or brief intervention plus a booster session (BIB). At 1-year follow-up, 447 patients (83% of the sample) were re-interviewed to measure alcohol-related negative consequences, injuries and drinking. RESULTS: Patients receiving BIB, but not B1 patients, reduced alcohol-related negative consequences and alcohol-related injuries more than did those in the SC group. All three groups reduced their days of heavy drinking. Patients with histories of hazardous drinking responded to BIB, whether or not they had consumed alcohol prior to their injury. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results indicate that the effects of a booster session that is added to a brief intervention in the ED can be helpful to injured patients with a history of hazardous or harmful drinking, irrespective of whether they have consumed alcohol prior to their injury.

Cognitive-behavioral treatment for alcohol dependence: a review of evidence for its hypothesized mechanisms of action.

OBJECTIVE: This review examined support for the hypothesis that cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for alcohol dependence works through increasing cognitive and behavioral coping skills. METHOD: Ten studies were identified that examined the hypothesized mechanisms of action of CBT. These studies involved random assignment (or its near equivalent) of participants to CBT and at least one comparison condition. RESULTS: Although numerous analyses of the possible causal links have been conducted to evaluate whether CBT works through increasing coping, the results indicate little support for the hypothesized mechanisms of action of CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Research has not yet established why CBT is an effective treatment for alcohol dependence. Negative findings may reflect methodological flaws of prior studies. Alternatively, findings may indicate one or more conceptual assumptions underlying CBT require revision.

Alcohol treatment research follow-up interviews and drinking behaviors.

OBJECTIVE: This study, drawing upon data collected as part of a randomized clinical trial of alcohol treatment matching effects, investigates the relationship between research follow-up assessment interviews and subsequent drinking behaviors. METHOD: Subjects (N = 188; 143 men) participated in a day hospital substance-use disorder treatment program at either a private psychiatric hospital (n = 151) or a community hospital (n = 37) and were classified into one of three research groups: regularly scheduled follow-up interviews, missed scheduled follow-up interviews, and delayed Year-2 follow-up interviews. Complete data relevant to the present study were collected on 157 subjects. RESULTS: Study results provided support for a subject reactivity effect related to the research follow-up interview; that is, those subjects classified within the regularly scheduled follow-up interviews condition had the better drinking outcomes. Furthermore, by the end of the second follow-up year, subjects classified within the delayed Year-2 follow-up interviews condition had the poorest drinking outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There may be considerable potential for subject reactivity effects, specific to the research assessment interview, to confound study results. Therefore, the interpretation of data from alcohol treatment outcome studies that fail to control for such potential confounding effects must be viewed with caution. Researchers are advised to control for these potentially confounding effects via methodological and/or statistical mechanisms.

Alcoholism treatment and medical care costs from Project MATCH.

AIMS: This paper examines the costs of medical care prior to and following initiation of alcoholism treatment as part of a study of patient matching to treatment modality. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with pre- and post-treatment initiation. MEASUREMENTS: The total medical care costs for inpatient and outpatient treatment for patients participating over a span of 3 years post-treatment. SETTING: Three treatment sites at two of the nine Project MATCH locations (Milwaukee, WI and Providence, RI). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and seventy-nine patients. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment modalities: a 12-session cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a four-session motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or a 12-session Twelve-Step facilitation (TSF) treatment over 12 weeks. FINDINGS: Total medical care costs declined from pre- to post-treatment overall and for each modality. Matching effects independent of clinical prognosis showed that MET has potential for medical-care cost-savings. However, patients with poor prognostic characteristics (alcohol dependence, psychiatric severity and/or social network support for drinking) have better cost-savings potential with CBT and/or TSF. CONCLUSIONS: Matching variables have significant importance in increasing the potential for medical-care cost-reductions following alcoholism treatment.

Matching alcoholics to treatment. Failure to replicate finding of an earlier study.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether sociopathic alcoholics respond differentially to different types of treatment. An earlier study found that alcoholics with antisocial personality disorder had somewhat better outcomes if treated in individually focused versus relationship-focused cognitive-behavioral treatment. The present study was designed to attempt to replicate these findings. One hundred and forty-nine alcoholics (42 of whom scored high on a measure of sociopathy) were randomly assigned to receive either individually focused cognitive-behavioral treatment or a relationship-focused community reinforcement approach. Follow-up evaluations were conducted every 4 months for 2 years. Results failed to support the study hypothesis. Drinking outcomes were similar for sociopathic alcoholics in both treatment conditions. Directions for future research are identified.

Alcohol expectancies as a mediator of the relationship between injury and readiness to change drinking behavior.

There is a well-established relationship between alcohol expectancies and drinking behavior. The purpose of the present study was to extend the literature by examining the role of alcohol expectancies in determining readiness to change drinking behavior among injured emergency department patients who screened positive for hazardous drinking. Negative expectancies were found to partially mediate the relationships of alcohol-related injuries and injury aversiveness to readiness to change drinking behavior. Results suggest that negative alcohol expectancies are a potential means of increasing patients' readiness to change drinking behavior.

General and alcohol-specific social support following treatment.

Both general and alcohol-specific support have been shown, albeit inconsistently, to affect drinking behavior. The discrepant findings may be clarified by examining how they work together. In exploratory analysis of clients following private outpatient alcoholism treatment, we found that the two variables add uniquely to the explanation of the variance in proportion of days abstinent (PDA). Both contribute significantly in the short term (3 months posttreatment), but only alcohol-specific support helps to explain variance over the longer term (15 months posttreatment), and alcohol-specific support explains more of the variance in PDA than general support at both time periods. More complex relationships are operating when short-term treatment effects have diminished. Alcohol-specific support mediates the relationship between general support and PDA, and both general social support and alcohol-specific support are moderators of one another in their relationships to PDA. Knowing how different types of social support affect drinking behavior at different intervals following treatment may help treatment providers to better prepare their clients for the posttreatment social environment.

Cognitive-behavioral coping-skills therapy for alcohol dependence. Current status and future directions.

Cognitive-behavioral coping-skills training (CBST) is an alcoholism treatment approach aimed at improving the patients' cognitive and behavioral skills for changing their drinking behavior. CBST encompasses a variety of approaches that despite their core similarities differ in duration, modality, content, and treatment setting. Numerous studies and reviews have ranked CBST among the most effective approaches for treating alcoholic patients. Nevertheless, a recent analysis of nine studies failed to identify specific CBST components that could account for the treatment's effectiveness. Furthermore, a similar analysis of 26 studies suggested that CBST's superior effectiveness was limited to specific treatment contexts (i.e., when delivered as part of a comprehensive treatment program) and to specific patient subgroups (e.g., patients with less severe alcohol dependence). Several measures may help broaden CBST's focus and effectiveness, such as incorporating components of other treatment approaches.

Actual and estimated replication costs for alcohol treatment modalities: case study from Project MATCH.

OBJECTIVE: As a first step in a thorough cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized alcohol-treatment-matching trial (Project MATCH), the present study examines the relative costs of three manual-guided, individually delivered treatments and the costs of replicating them in nonresearch settings. METHOD: Costs of delivering a 12-session Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), a 4-session Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) and a 12- session Twelve-Step Facilitation (TSF) treatment over 12 weeks were assessed for three treatment sites at two of the nine Project MATCH locations (Milwaukee, WI, and Providence, RI). Research cost calculations included clinical, administrative and training/supervision variables in determining total treatment costs, average cost per contact hour and average cost per research participant. Investigators from all nine MATCH locations estimated direct clinical costs, administrative overhead costs and training/supervision costs for replicating these treatments. RESULTS: For Project MATCH, MET cost twice as much or more per patient contact hour (mean = $498) than CBT (mean = $198) and TSF (mean = $253) but was less costly per research participant (mean = $1,700) than both CBT (mean = $1,901) and TSF (mean = $1,969). For clinical replication, high end per patient costs ranged from $512 for MET to $750 for TSF to $788 for CBT: a cost savings for MET of $238 (32%) over TSF and $276 (35%) over CBT. CONCLUSIONS: As part of a randomized clinical trial, MATCH treatments are costly to produce. However, when estimates are used to project these costs to nonresearch clinical settings, the costs are greatly reduced. Whereas MET appears to be much less costly to deliver in nonresearch settings than the other two treatments, the estimated cost differentials are less than the 1:3 treatment session ratio for MET versus TSF or CBT.

An outcome evaluation of a hospital-based early intervention program.

AIM: To determine the effectiveness of the Health Care Intervention Service (HIS), an early intervention program for general hospital patients with alcohol dependence or at risk for alcohol dependence. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: HIS consists of screening, assessment and assignment to either full or risk-reduction intervention. Full intervention includes a referral to treatment. Outcomes were compared across three groups: those who received a full intervention, those who received a risk-reduction intervention, and a comparison group of similar patients from hospitals with no HIS program. Patients were screened for alcohol involvement and interviewed during their hospitalization (prior to the intervention in HIS hospitals) and again 6 months following the intervention. FINDINGS: Full intervention was effective in increasing the probability of abstinence, reducing the number of heavy drinking days, and encouraging patients to accept the referral to treatment. Risk-reduction intervention was effective in reducing alcohol consumption and consequences, but only for those patients who had some signs of dependence at the first interview. CONCLUSIONS: HIS has demonstrated its effectiveness in a "real world" bureaucratic and clinical environment.

Internal validity of Project MATCH treatments: discriminability and integrity.

Project MATCH (Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity) is a multisite collaborative project designed to evaluate patient-treatment interactions in alcoholism treatment. To evaluate whether major threats to the internal validity of the independent (treatment) variable in Project MATCH could be ruled out, we investigated several aspects of treatment integrity and discriminability. In this study, 1,726 alcohol-dependent participants at 10 sites were randomized to 3 treatments: cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT), motivational enhancement therapy (MET), and 12-step facilitation (TSF). Participants received treatment either as outpatients or as aftercare following a more intensive inpatient or day hospital treatment. For both the outpatient and aftercare arms of the study, treatments were discriminable in that therapists implemented each of the treatments according to manual guidelines and rarely used techniques associated with comparison approaches. Participants received a high level of exposure to their study treatments, and the intended contrast in treatment dose between MET and the 2 more intensive treatments (CBT and TSF) was obtained. Alcoholics Anonymous involvement was significantly higher for participants assigned to TSF versus MET or CBT, whereas the treatments did not differ in utilization of other nonstudy treatments. Nonspecific aspects of treatment such as therapist skillfulness and level of the therapeutic alliance were comparable across treatment conditions.

Network support for drinking, Alcoholics Anonymous and long-term matching effects.

AIMS: (1) To examine the matching hypothesis that Twelve Step Facilitation Therapy (TSF) is more effective than Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) for alcohol-dependent clients with networks highly supportive of drinking 3 years following treatment; (2) to test a causal chain providing the rationale for this effect. DESIGN: Outpatients were re-interviewed 3 years following treatment. ANCOVAs tested the matching hypothesis. SETTING: Outpatients from five clinical research units distributed across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred and six alcohol-dependent clients. INTERVENTION: Clients were randomly assigned to one of three 12-week, manually-guided, individual treatments: TSF, MET or Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills Therapy (CBT). MEASUREMENTS: Network support for drinking prior to treatment, Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) involvement during and following treatment, percentage of days abstinent and drinks per drinking day during months 37-39. FINDINGS: (1) The a priori matching hypothesis that TSF is more effective than MET for clients with networks supportive of drinking was supported at the 3 year follow-up; (2) AA involvement was a partial mediator of this effect; clients with networks supportive of drinking assigned to TSF were more likely to be involved in AA; AA involvement was associated with better 3-year drinking outcomes for such clients. CONCLUSIONS: (1) In the long-term TSF may be the treatment of choice for alcohol-dependent clients with networks supportive of drinking; (2) involvement in AA should be given special consideration for clients with networks supportive of drinking, irrespective of the therapy they will receive.

Analysis of alcohol use clusters among subcritically injured emergency department patients.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To cluster patients according to self-reported drinking patterns using cluster analysis; 2) to externally validate clustered groups on variables related to drinking but not used in the cluster analysis; and 3) to use the clustered patients' responses to alcohol consumption questions to develop a brief screening tool emergency physicians can use to identify patients in need of referral or intervention related to potentially hazardous alcohol consumption. METHODS: A self-report battery was administered to 95 subcritically injured patients. Patients also were saliva alcohol-tested upon arrival to the ED. Using the patients' self-reported quantity, frequency of alcohol consumption, and frequency of having > or = 6 drinks on a drinking occasion, patients were categorized into 3 groups using cluster analysis. The 3 clusters were externally validated using injury-related variables, alcohol-related consequences, and the patients' reported readiness to change drinking. A screening tool was developed using cutoff values reported by the patients' answers to drinking pattern questions. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were alcohol-negative, and 36 tested alcohol-positive (i.e., > 4 mmol/L [> 20 mg/dL]) or had elevated scores on an alcohol problem screening instrument. Three distinct drinking pattern clusters were found. Clusters were validated using discriminant function analysis and multivariate analyses of variance to confirm cluster classifications. Steady and high-intensity drinkers reported more alcohol-related negative consequences, and high-intensity drinkers indicated they would consider changing their drinking. The screening tool correctly classified 97% of the patient sample into their respective clusters. CONCLUSIONS: Using the drinking pattern questions in the clustering procedure was effective for grouping injured patients into clusters that could be differentiated on other drinking-related variables. The resulting screening tool can be used in the ED setting to screen patients for further assessment and intervention. The readiness-to-change results support the assertion that the injury event provides a "teachable moment" for subcritically injured patients whose injury may be related to their alcohol consumption.

A comparison sample validation of "your workplace": an instrument to measure perceived alcohol support and consequences from the work environment.

This paper addresses the psychometric properties of Your Workplace (YWP), an instrument developed to measure perceived influence of workplace norms and attitudes on alcohol involvement and the experience of adverse consequences. Data were collected from a large, geographically dispersed sample of aftercare and outpatients recruited for a multisite clinical trial of alcoholism treatments, Project MATCH. Administration of YWP at the baseline assessment was restricted to workforce participants. A confirmatory factor analysis addressed instrument structure. Internal consistency and concurrent association between measures of general social support, alcohol specific support, and alcohol involvement were examined. YWP scales were found to have adequate internal consistency reliability. Correlation between YWP scales and concurrent measures of alcohol involvement were among the strongest found. Identification of workplace influences on alcohol involvement allows refined assessment and fosters a comprehensive approach to treatment of alcoholism.

The therapeutic alliance and its relationship to alcoholism treatment participation and outcome.

The relationship between the therapeutic alliance and treatment participation and drinking outcomes during and after treatment was evaluated among alcoholic outpatient and aftercare clients. In the outpatient sample, ratings of the working alliance, whether provided by the client or therapist, were significant predictors of treatment participation and drinking behavior during the treatment and 12-month posttreatment periods, after a variety of other sources of variance were controlled. Ratings of the alliance by the aftercare clients did not predict treatment participation or drinking outcomes. Therapists ratings of the alliance in the aftercare sample predicted only percentage of days abstinent during treatment and follow-up. The results document the independent contribution of the therapeutic alliance to treatment participation and outcomes among alcoholic outpatients.

Interpersonal factors and post-treatment drinking and subjective wellbeing.

AIMS: A conceptual clarification of the domain of social relationships defines three aspects of social relationships (structure, function and quality), which have both alcohol-specific and general components. We analyse the correlations among post-treatment indicators of social relationships and the association between these interpersonal variables and post-treatment drinking and subjective wellbeing. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data from an alcohol treatment outcome study, in which subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions and followed for 18 months. SETTING: The outpatient treatment program is located within a private psychiatric hospital in the north-eastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed the 140 subjects who completed a social network instrument 12 months following treatment assignment. INTERVENTION: This secondary analysis combined clients from three treatment conditions, all of which were based upon social learning theory. MEASUREMENTS: Interview and questionnaire self-report data were collected by trained interviewers. FINDINGS: Indicators of social relationships are found to be relatively independent of one another. Only alcohol-specific social relationship indicators are significantly associated with drinking outcomes, and only general indicators are significantly associated with subjective wellbeing. Functional indicators, addressing social interaction content, have stronger effects on outcomes than structural or quality indicators. General and alcohol-specific support from friends have more influence than support from family; both surpass the influence of co-workers. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of the roles of social relationships during the course of treatment and recovery or relapse may help clarify how treatment personnel can utilize clients' interpersonal relationships more effectively to maximize treatment effectiveness.