Clinical and Ophthalmological Characteristics of Ocular Syphilis in a Retrospective Tertiary Hospital Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Data on ocular syphilis (OS) and its clinical presentation are currently insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of a cohort with a high OS incidence at a university hospital in Germany, focusing on the clinical presentation of OS. METHODS: This single-center cohort study retrospectively analyzed data on 90 patients with 109 episodes of syphilis between 2008 and 2018. Cases of OS were identified and additionally reevaluated through a study-specific secondary assessment by an ophthalmologist specializing in uveitis. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (26%) were diagnosed with OS, 16 (70%) of whom were with binocular involvement. Uveitis, especially that of the posterior segment, showed a high prevalence. Lumbar puncture was performed in 20 OS patients (87%), of whom 17 (85% of those with lumbar puncture/74% in total) met the 2018 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for likely neurosyphilis. Five (22%) of 23 patients had HIV infection, of whom 2 did not receive antiretroviral therapy. The preferred syphilis treatment regimens were benzylpenicillin and ceftriaxone, which yielded favorable serological, clinical, and ophthalmological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A high incidence of OS was identified, and physicians should be aware of uveitis as a manifestation of syphilis. Most patients presented with uveitis and syphilis in an early or late latent stage and showed central nervous system involvement.

[Endogenous Endophthalmitis: Epidemiology, Clinic, Therapy and Visual Outcome]. / Endogene Endophthalmitis: Ursachen, Keimspektrum, Therapie und Visusverlauf.

BACKGROUND: Endogenous endophthalmitis is a rare and severe inflammation of the eye in the context of a systemic infectious disease, which can lead to the loss of the affected eye in the worst case. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a 5-year period, 20 eyes were treated for endogenous endophthalmitis and evaluated retrospectively. Evaluation parameters were epidemiological data, causes, concomitant diseases, assessment of the pathogen spectrum, therapy and visual acuity. RESULTS: 13.2% (n = 20/152; 20 eyes of 17 patients) of all endophthalmitis cases were of endogenous origin. In 15% (n = 3/20) of the cases, bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis was present. The cause for the endophthalmitis was generalised sepsis in 9 of 17 cases, an infection of the urogenital tract in 2 of 17 cases and endocarditis and liver abscess in 1 of 17 cases, respectively. In 4 of 17 cases, no primary foci were detected. Eight of 17 patients suffered from diabetes mellitus, 6 of 17 from renal insufficiency and 2 of 17 from malignancies, pneumonia or rheumatism. Two of 17 patients had had an organ transplantation, 15 of 17 suffered from cardiovascular diseases, 3 of 17 were immunosuppressed and 2 of 17 reported drug abuse. Four of 17 infections were caused by streptococci, 3 of 17 by Candida, 2 of 17 by herpes viruses and 1 of 17 by Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus. No pathogen could be found in 5 cases. The time interval between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis and the beginning of the therapy was 4 days (min.: 1 day; max.: 39 days). This was significantly longer in comparison with other causes of endophthalmitis (p < 0.001). Median visual acuity (VA) was 2.0 logMAR (n = 19/20) at the first presentation. One month and three months after initiation of the therapy VA was 1.3 logMAR (both n = 15/20), VA was 0.1 logMAR (n = 9/20) at the one year follow-up. Retinal detachment occurred in 2 of 20 eyes and recurrence of the endophthalmitis in 1 of 20 eyes within the one year follow-up, 5 of 17 patients died. Enucleation was never necessary. CONCLUSION: Endogenous endophthalmitis is often misdiagnosed due to a severe underlying non-ophthalmological disease. Delayed presentation with consequent late initiation of therapy is an unresolved problem, because colleagues from other fields are often unexperienced in diagnosing the ocular infection. This is also a cause of the already poor visual prognosis. Ophthalmologists can usually only influence the choice of the proper therapy.

Microbial keratitis-induced endophthalmitis: incidence, symptoms, therapy, visual prognosis and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate symptoms, therapies and outcomes in rare microbial keratitis-induced endophthalmitis. METHODS: Retrospective study with 11 patients treated between 2009 and 2014. Clinical findings, corneal diseases, history of steroids and trauma, use of contact lenses, number and type of surgical interventions, determination of causative organisms and visual acuity (VA) were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of transformation from microbial keratitis to an endophthalmitis was 0.29% (n = 11/3773). In 90.9% (n = 10/11), there were pre-existent eyelid and corneal problems, in 45.5% (n = 5/11) rubeosis iridis with increased intraocular pressure and corneal decompensation, and in 18.2% (n = 2/11), ocular trauma. Specimens could be obtained in 10 of 11 samples: 33.3% of those 10 specimens were Gram-positive coagulase-negative Staphylococci (n = 3/10) or Gram-negative rods (n = 3/10) and 10.0% Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1/10). In 30% (n = 3/10), no pathogens were identifiable. 72.7% (n = 8/11) of all keratitis-induced endophthalmitis were treated with vitrectomy and 9.1% (n = 1/11) with amniotic-membrane transplantation. In 27.3% (n = 3/11) the infected eye had to be enucleated - 18.2% (n = 2/11) primarily, 9.1% (n = 1/11) secondarily. No patient suffered from sympathetic ophthalmia. The median initial VA was 2.1 logMAR (n = 11/11). At one month, median VA was 2.0 logMAR (n = 7/11), after three months 2.0 logMAR (n = 6/11), and after one year 2.05 logMAR (n = 6/11). The change in VA was not significant (p > 0.99). 36.4% (n = 4/11) of the cases resulted in blindness. CONCLUSIONS: The overall outcome is poor. Enucleation should be weighed against the risk of local and systemic spread of the infection, prolonged rehabilitation and sympathetic ophthalmia.

Head and neck giant cell arteritis: an autoimmune disease with many faces.

CONCLUSION: A high rate of infrequent presentations of giant cell arteritis were seen in the ENT department and should be anticipated as a differential diagnosis in every older patient with odynophagia with high CRP values without cause in thorough ENT examination. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical manifestation of head and neck giant cell arteritis and to derive a diagnostic pathway covering atypical cases. METHOD: Single-center, retrospective analysis of cases with GCA in the head and neck region (HN-GCA) (2002-2012) to describe the clinical presentation and to derive a diagnostic pathway covering manifestations presenting to an ENT department. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were newly diagnosed with HN-GCA in the department of otolaryngology, ophthalmology and neurology. The most frequent symptoms were loss of vision (83%) and new onset headache (63%). Eight patients (12%) presented with infrequent manifestations, predominantly in the department of otorhinolaryngology. The most common atypical presentation (50%) was odynophagia in conjunction with high CRP values misleading to an infectious cause and delaying diagnosis. A diagnostic pathway for GCA was derived based on the ACR classification criteria and the clinical findings.