Increased posterior tibial slope is an independent risk factor of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft rupture irrespective of graft choice.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure remains a commonly seen complication despite advances in technique and graft options. Recently, several studies have shown that the inclination of the tibial plateau in the sagittal plane affects the stability of the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to determine if an increased posterior slope of the tibia is associated with failure of ACL reconstruction irrespective of the graft used. METHODS: From June 2002 to August 2003, a total of 100 patients with a symptomatic ACL-deficient knee were randomised to receive either a hamstring autograft or posterior tibialis allograft. All allografts were from a single tissue bank, aseptically processed, and fresh-frozen without terminal irradiation. ACL graft failures requiring reoperation with a minimum of 10-year follow-up were identified via telephone survey. Lateral radiographs of the knee of all patients were reviewed, and the slope of the tibia was measured using a standardised technique. Two fellowship-trained orthopaedic sports medicine specialists, one board-certified general orthopaedic surgeon, and two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists measured the tibial slope in all patients. RESULTS: At a minimum of 10-year follow-up, there were four (8.3%) autograft and 13 (26.5%) allograft failures that required revision reconstruction. The overall average tibial slope of the nonfailure cohort was 9.4°. The overall average tibial slope of the failure cohort was 11.9° (P â€‹= â€‹0.0002). The average slope of the allograft failures was 11.5°compared with an average slope of 9.6° in the nonfailures (P â€‹= â€‹0.01). The average slope of the autograft failures was 13.1° compared with 9.3° in the nonfailures (P â€‹= â€‹0.011). The mean difference in tibial slope measurements was 0.665 (95% confidence interval: 0.569-0.750). The interrater reliability, as measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient, for tibial slope was 0.898 (95% confidence interval: 0.859-0.928). The Cronbach α was 0.904. CONCLUSION: In a prospective, randomised trial of ACL reconstructions using either autograft or allograft, failures were associated with a significantly increased slope of the tibia compared with the nonfailures at 10-year follow-up.

Correlation of stress radiographs to injuries associated with lateral ankle instability.

BACKGROUND: Stress radiographs have demonstrated superior efficacy in the evaluation of ankle instability. AIM: To determine if there is a degree of instability evidenced by stress radiographs that is associated with pathology concomitant with ankle ligamentous instability. METHODS: A retrospective review of 87 consecutive patients aged 18-74 who had stress radiographs performed at a single institution between 2014 and 2020 was performed. These manual radiographic stress views were then correlated with magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings. RESULTS: A statistically significant association was determined for the mean and median stress radiographic values and the presence of peroneal pathology (P = 0.008 for tendonitis and P = 0.020 for peroneal tendon tears). A significant inverse relationship was found between the presence of an osteochondral defect and increasing degrees of instability (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Although valuable in the clinical evaluation of ankle instability, stress radiographs are not an independent predictor of conditions associated with ankle instability.

Does the h-index and self-citation affect external funding of orthopedic surgery research? An analysis of fellowship directors and their subspecialties.

PURPOSE: Determine the impact of self-citation on external funding for orthopedic fellowship directors. METHODS: The San Francisco Match's website identified directors encompassing 8 subspecialties. The Scopus database identified the number of publications, citations, and h-index for each director. H-index was assessed with/without self-citation. RESULTS: Mean publications, citations, self-citation rate, and h-index for the 446 directors were 71.2, 1816, 3.86%, and 18.3, respectively. Excluding self-citations reduces mean h-index to 18.0; and h-index changed by ≤ 1 integer in 95% of directors. CONCLUSIONS: Self-citation has minimal impact among fellowship directors and should not be adjusted for when considering external funding.