Spatial and temporal organization of the E. coli PTS components.

The phosphotransferase system (PTS) controls preferential use of sugars in bacteria. It comprises of two general proteins, enzyme I (EI) and HPr, and various sugar-specific permeases. Using fluorescence microscopy, we show here that EI and HPr localize near the Escherichia coli cell poles. Polar localization of each protein occurs independently, but HPr is released from the poles in an EI- and sugar-dependent manner. Conversely, the ß-glucoside-specific permease, BglF, localizes to the cell membrane. EI, HPr and BglF control the ß-glucoside utilization (bgl) operon by modulating the activity of the BglG transcription factor; BglF inactivates BglG by membrane sequestration and phosphorylation, whereas EI and HPr activate it by an unknown mechanism in response to ß-glucosides availability. Using biochemical, genetic and imaging methodologies, we show that EI and HPr interact with BglG and affect its subcellular localization in a phosphorylation-independent manner. Upon sugar stimulation, BglG migrates from the cell periphery to the cytoplasm through the poles. Hence, the PTS components appear to control bgl operon expression by ushering BglG between the cellular compartments. Our results reinforce the notion that signal transduction in bacteria involves dynamic localization of proteins.

Modulation of transcription antitermination in the bgl operon of Escherichia coli by the PTS.

BglG, which regulates expression of the beta-glucoside utilization (bgl) operon in Escherichia coli, represents a family of RNA-binding transcriptional antiterminators that positively regulate transcription of sugar utilization genes in Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms. BglG is negatively regulated by the beta-glucoside phosphotransferase, BglF, by means of phosphorylation and physical association, and it is positively regulated by the general phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system (PTS) proteins, enzyme I (EI) and HPr. We studied the positive regulation of BglG both in vitro and in vivo. Here, we show that although EI and HPr are essential for BglG activity, this mode of activation does not require phosphorylation of BglG by HPr, as opposed to the phosphorylation-mediated activation of many BglG-like antiterminators in Gram-positive organisms. The effect of EI and HPr on BglG is not mediated by BglF. Nevertheless, the release of BglG from BglF, which is stimulated by the extracellular sugar in a sugar uptake-independent manner, is a prerequisite for BglG activation. Taken together, the results indicate that activation of BglG is a 2-stage process: a sugar-stimulated release from the membrane-bound sugar sensor followed by a phosphorylation-independent stimulatory effect exerted by the general PTS proteins.

Modulation of monomer conformation of the BglG transcriptional antiterminator from Escherichia coli.

The BglG protein positively regulates expression of the bgl operon in Escherichia coli by binding as a dimer to the bgl transcript and preventing premature termination of transcription in the presence of beta-glucosides. BglG activity is negatively controlled by BglF, the beta-glucoside phosphotransferase, which reversibly phosphorylates BglG according to beta-glucoside availability, thus modulating its dimeric state. BglG consists of an RNA-binding domain and two homologous domains, PRD1 and PRD2. Based on structural studies of a BglG homologue, the two PRDs fold similarly, and the interactions within the dimer are PRD1-PRD1 and PRD2-PRD2. We have recently shown that the affinity between PRD1 and PRD2 of BglG is high, and a fraction of the BglG monomers folds in the cell into a compact conformation, in which PRD1 and PRD2 are in close proximity. We show here that both BglG forms, the compact and noncompact, bind to the active site-containing domain of BglF, IIB(bgl), in vitro. The interaction of BglG with IIB(bgl) or BglF is mediated by PRD2. Both BglG forms are detected as phosphorylated proteins after in vitro phosphorylation with IIB(bgl) and are dephosphorylated by BglF in vitro in the presence of beta-glucosides. Nevertheless, genetic evidence indicates that the interaction of IIB(bgl) and BglF with the compact form is seemingly less favorable. Using in vivo cross-linking, we show that BglF enhances folding of BglG into a compact conformation, whereas the addition of beta-glucosides reduces the amount of this form. Based on these results we suggest a model for the modulation of BglG conformation and activity by BglF.

The BglF sensor recruits the BglG transcription regulator to the membrane and releases it on stimulation.

The Escherichia coli BglF protein is a sugar-sensor that controls the activity of the transcriptional antiterminator BglG by reversibly phosphorylating it, depending on beta-glucoside availability. BglF is a membrane-bound protein, whereas BglG is a soluble protein, and they are both present in the cell in minute amounts. How do BglF and BglG find each other to initiate signal transduction efficiently? Using bacterial two-hybrid systems and the Far-Western technique, we demonstrated unequivocally that BglG binds to BglF and to its active site-containing domain in vivo and in vitro. Measurements by surface plasmon resonance corroborated that the affinity between these proteins is high enough to enable their stable binding. To visualize the subcellular localization of BglG, we used fluorescence microscopy. In cells lacking BglF, the BglG-GFP fusion protein was evenly distributed throughout the cytoplasm. In contrast, in cells producing BglF, BglG-GFP was localized to the membrane. On addition of beta-glucoside, BglG-GFP was released from the membrane, becoming evenly distributed throughout the cell. Using mutant proteins and genetic backgrounds that impede phosphorylation of the Bgl proteins, we demonstrated that BglG-BglF binding and recruitment of BglG to the membrane sensor requires phosphorylation but does not depend on the individual phosphorylation sites of the Bgl proteins. We suggest a mechanism for rapid response to environmental changes by preassembly of signaling complexes, which contain transcription regulators recruited by their cognate sensors-kinases, under nonstimulating conditions, and release of the regulators to the cytoplasm on stimulation. This mechanism might be applicable to signaling cascades in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.