Risk of ileocolic anastomosis failure after right hemicolectomy for cancer. A comparison between different techniques.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the role of laparoscopic approach in the surgical treatment of right colon cancer has increased. Results comparing the different techniques of ileocolic anastomoses are controversial, with studies only reporting some advantages of the intracorporeal laparoscopic technique. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy for right colon cancer, focusing on anastomotic techniques (intracorporeal vs extracorporeal in the laparoscopic procedure, and manual vs mechanical in the laparotomic procedure). METHODS: This is a retrospective single center study enrolling patients with right colon cancer from January 2016 to December 2020. Primary endpoint of the study was the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). RESULTS: A total of 161 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy were enrolled: 91 were performed with laparoscopic technique, and 70 with open technique. Overall, AL occurred in 15 pts (9.3%). We observed 4 AL in intracorporeal (12.9%) and 6 in extracorporeal (10%) anastomoses, respectively. In the laparotomy group 5 patients (7.1%) developed AL, of which 3 (5.7%) and 2 (11.1%) manually and mechanically performed, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, laparoscopic hemicolectomy has a higher incidence of anastomotic leak. In the laparoscopic group, we observed the lowest rate of AL with extracorporeal mechanical anastomosis. When performed extracorporeally with open technique, hand-sewn anastomosis has better results than mechanical. KEY WORDS: Anastomosis, Cancer, Ileotransverse, Leakage, Right Colectomy.

Short course radiotherapy and delayed surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer in frail patients: is it a valid option?

OBJECTIVE: The endpoint of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and SCRT with delayed surgery (SCRT-DS) on a selected subgroup of frail patients with locally advanced middle/low rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2018, a total of 128 frail patients with locally advanced middle-low rectal adenocarcinoma underwent SCRT and subsequent restaging for eventual delayed surgery. Rates of complete pathological response, down-staging, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: 128 patients completed 5 × 5 Gy pelvic radiotherapy. 69 of these were unfit for surgery; 59 underwent surgery 8 weeks (average time: 61 days) after radiotherapy. Downstaging of T occurred in 64% and down-staging of N in 50%. The median overall survival (OS) of SCRT alone was 19.5 months. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year and 5-year OS was 48%, 22%, 14% and 0% respectively. In the surgical group, the median disease-free survival (DFS) and median OS were, respectively, 67 months (95% CI 49.8-83.1 months) and 72.1 months (95% CI 57.5-86.7 months). The 1, 2, 3, 5-year OS was 88%, 75%, 51%, 46%, respectively. Post-operative morbidity was 22%, mortality was 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients with advanced rectal cancer are often "unfit" for long-term neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A SCRT may be considered a valid option for this group of patients. Once radiotherapy is completed, patients can be re-evaluated for surgery. If feasible, SCRT and delayed surgery is the best option for frail patients.

Sporadic aggressive fibromatosis of the colon and abdominal wall in an emergency setting.

AIM: Our aim is to present an utterly unique case of sporadic aggressive fibromatosis (AF), infiltrating both the abdominal wall and the colon; and especially, to discuss the usefulness of porcine dermal meshes for the reconstruction of a large parietal gap in contaminated surgery and in an emergency setting. CASE EXPERIENCE: We report the case of a 40 years old woman affected by sporadic AF, involving both the anterior abdominal wall and the colon, with an effective intestinal stricture. The surgery consisted in removing "en bloc" the portions of the colon and abdominal wall affected by fibromatosis, with no residual tumor (R0), that left an important parietal gap. A biological prosthesis of cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen (APDC) has been used for the contextual reconstruction of the abdominal wall, sutured inlay by a double line of non absorbable stitches. No complications have been observed. After one year follow up, there is no tumour recurrence and the abdominal wall has fully consolidated. DISCUSSION: The peculiar problems arising about differential diagnosis, therapeutic indications and reconstructive surgical procedures are discussed, especially with regard to prosthetic implants in contaminated surgery and to cross-linked APDC prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Complete surgical removal is the first line treatment in sporadic AF, whenever feasible. In the reported case, an R0 resection was obtained at the cost of a wide parietal gap. According to our experience, cross-linked APDC is effective for the prosthetic reconstruction of abdominal wall in contaminated surgery and in an emergency setting. KEY WORDS: Abdominal wall, Aggressive fibromatosis, Desmoid tumor, Prosthetic devices, Reconstructive surgical procedures, desmoid tumor.

Total transverse rupture of the duodenum after blunt abdominal trauma.

AIM: Complete transverse rupture of the duodenum as an isolated lesion in blunt trauma can be considered as exceptional. The aim of this report is to discuss diagnostic procedures and surgical options in such an infrequent presentation. CASE EXPERIENCE: We report on a 37 year old man who had a total transverse rupture of the duodenum after blunt abdominal trauma. Diagnosis was suspected after contrast enhanced CT scan and confirmed at laparotomy; duodenal rupture was repaired by an end to end duodenal-duodenal anastomosis, after Kocher maneuver. The patient had fast and complete recovery. DISCUSSION: A high index of suspicion is necessary for timely diagnosis. Multi detector contrast enhanced CT scan is the gold standard for that aim. Surgical management must be tailored on an individual basis, since many techniques are available for both reconstruction and duodenum decompression. Kocher maneuver is essential for complete inspection of the pancreatic duodenal block and for appropriate reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Management of isolated duodenal rupture can be difficult. Contrast enhanced TC scans is essential for timely diagnosis. Primary repair can be achieved by an end to end duodenum anastomosis after Kocher maneuver, although alternative techniques are available for tailored solutions. Complex duodenum decompression techniques are not mandatory.