Diabetes Management in Detention Facilities: A Statement of the American Diabetes Association.

This statement provides guidance for diabetes care in detention facilities. It focuses on areas where the processes for delivery of care to people with diabetes in detention facilities may differ from those in the community, and key points are made at the end of each section. Areas of emphasis, which inform multiple aspects discussed in this statement, include 1) timely identification or diagnosis of diabetes treatment needs and continuity of care (at reception/intake, during transfers, and upon discharge), 2) nutrition and physical activity, 3) timely access to diabetes management tools (insulin, blood glucose monitoring, tracking data, current diabetes management technologies, etc.), and 4) treatment of the whole person with diabetes (self-management education, mental health support, monitoring and addressing long-term complications, specialty care, etc.).

Preadmission predictors of severe COVID-19 in patients with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To explore predictors of severe COVID-19 disease in patients with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of adults with diabetes admitted for COVID-19. Bivariate tests and multivariable Cox regression were used to identify risk factors for severe COVID-19, defined as a composite endpoint of intensive care unit admission/intubation or in-hospital death. RESULTS: In 1134 patients with diabetes admitted for COVID-19, more severe disease was associated with older age (HR 1.02, p<0.001), male sex (HR 1.28, p=0.017), Asian race (HR 1.34, p=0.029 [reference: white]), and greater obesity (moderate obesity HR 1.59, p=0.015; severe obesity HR 2.07, p=0.002 [reference: normal body mass index]). Outpatient diabetes medications were not associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Age, male sex, Asian race, and obesity were associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease in adults with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19. SUMMARY: In patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19 disease, we observed that age, male sex, Asian race, and obesity predicted severe COVID-19 outcomes of intensive care unit admission, intubation, or in-hospital death. The risk conferred by obesity increased with worsening obesity. Outpatient diabetes medications were not observed to be significant predictors of study outcomes.

Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Compared With Injected Prandial Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized 24-Week Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of Technosphere insulin (TI) and insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This open-label noninferiority trial compared the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 of prandial TI (n = 174) with that of subcutaneous aspart (n = 171), both with basal insulin, in patients with type 1 diabetes and HbA1c 7.5-10.0% (56.8-86.0 mmol/mol). RESULTS: Mean change in HbA1c in TI patients (-0.21% [-2.3 mmol/mol]) from baseline (7.94% [63.3 mmol/mol]) was noninferior to that in aspart patients (-0.40% [-4.4 mmol/mol]) from baseline (7.92% [63.1 mmol/mol]). The between-group difference was 0.19% (2.1 mmol/mol) (95% CI 0.02-0.36), satisfying the noninferiority margin of 0.4%. However, more aspart patients achieved HbA1c <7.0% (53.0 mmol/mol) (30.7% vs. 18.3%). TI patients had a small weight loss (-0.4 kg) compared with a gain (+0.9 kg) for aspart patients (P = 0.0102). TI patients had a lower hypoglycemia event rate than aspart patients (9.8 vs. 14.0 events/patient-month, P < 0.0001). Cough (generally mild) was the most frequent adverse event (31.6% with TI, 2.3% with aspart), leading to discontinuation in 5.7% of patients. Treatment group difference for mean change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s was small (40 mL) and disappeared upon TI discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 1 diabetes receiving basal insulin, HbA1c reduction with TI was noninferior to that of aspart, with less hypoglycemia and less weight gain but increased incidence of cough.

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Co-Administration of Sitagliptin with Intensively Titrated Insulin Glargine.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of sitagliptin on insulin dose in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes who titrate basal insulin to a target fasting glucose level after initiating sitagliptin. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week clinical trial in which treatment with sitagliptin 100 mg/day or placebo was administered concurrently with insulin glargine titration, targeting a fasting glucose of 4.0-5.6 mmol/L (72-100 mg/dL). The trial randomized 660 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control on insulin, with or without metformin (≥1500 mg/day) or sulfonylurea, for ≥10 weeks. Patients could remain on metformin but not sulfonylurea after randomization. RESULTS: The increase from baseline in the daily dose of insulin was less in the sitagliptin group (N = 329) compared to placebo (N = 329) (between group difference = -4.7 IU [95% confidence interval [CI] -8.3, -1.2]; p = 0.009). Patients in the sitagliptin group had lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels after 24 weeks (between-group difference of -0.4% [95% CI -0.6, -0.3; -4.9 mmol/mol (95% CI -6.6, -3.2)]; p < 0.001), and more patients in the sitagliptin group reached the HbA1c goal of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol), with a between-group difference of 17.3% (95% CI 10.4%, 24.1%; p < 0.001). Fewer patients in the sitagliptin group experienced an adverse event of hypoglycemia (between-group difference = -15.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Administration of sitagliptin prior to intensive titration of basal insulin glargine reduces the insulin dose requirement while providing superior glycemic control and less hypoglycemia, compared to an insulin-only regimen. FUNDING: Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Importance of cardiovascular disease risk management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is commonly accompanied by other cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, such as hypertension, obesity, and dyslipidemia. Furthermore, CVD is the most common cause of death in people with T2DM. It is therefore of critical importance to minimize the risk of macrovascular complications by carefully managing modifiable CVD risk factors in patients with T2DM. Therapeutic strategies should include lifestyle and pharmacological interventions targeting hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, cigarette smoking, physical inactivity, and prothrombotic factors. This article discusses the impact of modifying these CVD risk factors in the context of T2DM; the clinical evidence is summarized, and current guidelines are also discussed. The cardiovascular benefits of smoking cessation, increasing physical activity, and reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure are well established. For aspirin therapy, any cardiovascular benefits must be balanced against the associated bleeding risk, with current evidence supporting this strategy only in certain patients who are at increased CVD risk. Although overweight, obesity, and hyperglycemia are clearly associated with increased cardiovascular risk, the effect of their modification on this risk is less well defined by available clinical trial evidence. However, for glucose-lowering drugs, further evidence is expected from several ongoing cardiovascular outcome trials. Taken together, the evidence highlights the value of early intervention and targeting multiple risk factors with both lifestyle and pharmacological strategies to give the best chance of reducing macrovascular complications in the long term.

GLP-1 receptor agonists: effects on cardiovascular risk reduction.

Comorbid obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension place patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) at greatly increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease-related morbidity and mortality. An urgent need exists for effective treatment for patients with T2DM that encompasses glycemic control, weight loss, and reduction in CV risk factors. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) liraglutide and exenatide are incretin-based antidiabetes agents. This review examines CV-associated effects of liraglutide and exenatide in animal models and clinical trials with patients with T2DM. Studies support the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs in reducing hyperglycemia. Further, GLP-1 RAs represent a significant advance in T2DM treatment because they uniquely affect a broad array of CV risk factors through significant weight and systolic blood pressure reduction, improved lipid levels, and possibly, as shown in in vitro studies and animal models, through direct effects on cardiac myocytes and endothelium.

Diabetes and driving safety: science, ethics, legality and practice.

Diabetes affects over 25 million people in the United States, most of whom are over the age of 16 and many of whom are licensed to drive a motor vehicle. Safe operation of a motor vehicle requires complex interactions of cognitive and motor functions and medical conditions that affect these functions often will increase the risk of motor vehicle accidents (MVA). In the case of diabetes, hypoglycemia is the most common factor that has been shown to increase MVA rates. When people with diabetes are compared with nondiabetic controls, systematic analyses show that the relative risk of MVA is increased by between 12% and 19% (Relative Risk Ratio 1.12-1.19). In comparison, the RRR for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is 4.4 and for sleep apnea is 2.4. Epidemiologic research suggests that patients at risk for hypoglycemia-related MVAs may have some characteristics in common, including a history of severe hypoglycemia or of hypoglycemia-related driving mishaps. Experimental studies also have shown that people with a history of hypoglycemia-related driving mishaps have abnormal counter-regulatory responses to hypoglycemia and greater cognitive impairments during moderate hypoglycemia.

Coverage of prandial insulin requirements by means of an ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin.

Barriers to the use of prandial insulin regimens include inadequate synchronization of insulin action to postprandial plasma glucose excursions as well as a significant risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain. Technosphere® insulin (TI) is an inhaled ultra-rapid-acting human insulin that is quickly absorbed in the alveoli. With a time to maximum plasma drug concentration of approximately 14 min and a time to maximum effect of 35 to 40 min, TI more closely matches the postprandial insulin concentrations seen in nondiabetic individuals. Studies have shown that long-term administration of prandial TI in combination with long-acting basal insulin results in reductions in hemoglobin A1c comparable to conventional subcutaneously injected prandial insulins but with improved control of early postprandial BG. Furthermore, TI has been associated with less weight gain and a lower incidence of hypoglycemia, which may enhance patient satisfaction and acceptability of insulin therapy. This review discusses the clinical properties of TI and proposes strategies for optimal use.

Reversibility of fenofibrate therapy-induced renal function impairment in ACCORD type 2 diabetic participants.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reversibility of the elevation of serum creatinine levels in patients with diabetes after 5 years of continuous on-trial fenofibrate therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: An on-drug/off-drug ancillary study to the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid Trial to investigate posttrial changes in serum creatinine and cystatin C. Eligible participants were recruited into a prospective, nested, three-group study based on retrospective on-trial serum creatinine levels: fenofibrate case subjects (n = 321, ≥ 20% increase after 3 months of therapy); fenofibrate control subjects (n = 175, ≤ 2% increase); and placebo control subjects (n = 565). Serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured at trial end and 6-8 weeks after discontinuation of trial therapy. RESULTS At trial end, case subjects had the highest adjusted serum creatinine (± SE) mg/dL (1.11 ± 0.02) and the lowest adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (± SE) mL/min/1.73 m(2) (68.4 ± 1.0) versus control subjects (1.01 ± 0.02; 74.8 ± 1.3) and placebo subjects (0.98 ± 0.01; 77.8 ± 0.7). After 51 days off-drug, serum creatinine in case subjects was still higher (0.97 ± 0.02) and eGFR still lower (77.8 ± 1.0) than control subjects (0.90 ± 0.02; 81.8 ± 1.3) but not different from placebo subjects (0.99 ± 0.01; 76.6 ± 0.7). Changes in serum cystatin C recapitulated the serum creatinine changes. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with significant initial on-trial increases in serum creatinine (≥ 20%) returned to the same level of renal function as participants receiving placebo while participants who had ≤ 2% increase in serum creatinine had net preservation of renal function compared with the same unselected placebo reference group. The fenofibrate-associated on-trial increases in serum creatinine were reversible, and the reversal was complete after 51 days off-drug. The similarity of the cystatin C results suggests that the mechanism of this change is not specific for serum creatinine.

Prandial inhaled insulin plus basal insulin glargine versus twice daily biaspart insulin for type 2 diabetes: a multicentre randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Insulin therapy is often a delayed strategy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus because it is associated with weight gain, hypoglycaemia, and the need for subcutaneous injections. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prandial Technosphere inhaled insulin compared with twice daily biaspart insulin. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, parallel-group study, adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and poor glycaemic control despite insulin therapy, with or without oral antidiabetes drugs, were enrolled from ten countries between Feb 23, 2006, and Aug 8, 2007. Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive 52 weeks' treatment with: prandial Technosphere inhaled insulin powder plus bedtime insulin glargine; or twice daily premixed biaspart insulin (70% insulin aspart protamine suspension and 30% insulin aspart of rDNA origin). The primary endpoint was a comparison of change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to week 52 between treatment groups; the non-inferiority margin was 0.4%. Analysis was by per protocol for non-inferiority testing of the primary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00309244. FINDINGS: 334 patients were allocated to inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine, and 343 to biaspart insulin; 107 patients on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine and 85 on biaspart insulin discontinued the trial. 211 patients on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine and 237 on biaspart insulin were included in per-protocol analyses. Change in HbA(1c) with inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine (-0.68%, SE 0.077, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.53) was similar and non-inferior to that with biaspart insulin (-0.76%, 0.071, -0.90 to -0.62). The between-group difference was 0.07% (SE 0.102, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.27). Patients had significantly lower weight gain and had fewer mild-to-moderate and severe hypoglycaemic events on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine than on biaspart insulin. The safety and tolerability profile was similar for both treatments, apart from increased occurrence of cough and change in pulmonary function in the group receiving inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine. INTERPRETATION: This study is part of a large clinical development programme addressing the efficacy and tolerability of use of Technosphere inhaled insulin in a wide variety of patients. FUNDING: MannKind.

Prevalence and treatment of anemia with once-weekly epoetin alfa in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics and prevalence of anemia in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) not receiving dialysis and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly (QW) epoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in these patients. METHODS: Post hoc subset analyses were conducted for 2 studies: a prospective, multicenter survey evaluating the prevalence of anemia in patients with CKD (the Prevalence of Anemia in Early Renal Insufficiency [PAERI] study) and a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of QW epoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia associated with CKD (the Clinical Evaluation of Procrit Dosed Once Weekly in Patients With Anemia Due to Early Renal Insufficiency [POWER] study). Patients in the POWER study received epoetin alfa, 10,000 U subcutaneously QW for up to 16 weeks. Each study subset consisted of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: More than 60% of patients in both studies had diabetes. In the PAERI study, 52.4% of the patients with diabetes (N = 3,361) had a hemoglobin (Hb) level < or = 12 g/dL, and 10.5% had Hb < or = 10 g/dL. Female sex, African American race, reduced kidney function, reduced transferrin saturation, and diabetes as the cause of CKD were strongly associated with anemia. In the POWER study, the mean Hb level in the patients with diabetes (N = 816) increased from 9.1 g/dL (baseline) to 11.6 g/dL (final); the mean increase in Hb from baseline was 2.4 g/dL (P<0.0001). Epoetin alfa therapy was associated with significant quality of life improvements and was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Diabetes is prevalent in patients with CKD not receiving dialysis, and anemia is prevalent among these patients. Epoetin alfa QW is safe and effective in treating anemia in these patients.

The prevalence of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: Anemia is a complication of chronic kidney disease and may contribute to adverse clinical outcomes. Early identification and treatment of anemia may improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. No large-scale population data are available specifically for patients with chronic kidney disease regarding prevalence of anemia, subpopulations at risk, and relationships between anemia and kidney function. This study was undertaken to address these questions in patients with chronic kidney disease, and investigate the relationship between anemia and glomerular filtration rate. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Large-scale, cross-sectional, US multicenter survey; 5222 patients (mean age, 68.2 years; 46.6% male); 237 physician practices. Eligible patients: > or = 18 years of age; serum creatinine: 1.5 mg/dL-6.0 mg/dL (females), 2.0 mg/dL-6.0 mg/dL (males). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary study end point: prevalence and severity of anemia (hemoglobin < or = 12 g/dL). Data further stratified by hemoglobin (< or = 12 g/dL, < or = 10 g/dL). RESULTS: Primary etiologies of chronic kidney disease (5222 evaluable patients): diabetes (49.5%); hypertension (33.0%). Glomerular filtration rate: < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for 97.7% of evaluable patients. Mean +/- SD serum creatinine level: 2.2 mg/dL +/- 0.9 mg/dL; 2.5 mg/dL +/- 1.0 mg/dL for males, 2.0 mg/dL +/- 0.8 mg/dL for females. Mean +/- SD hemoglobin: 12.2 g/dL +/- 1.6 g/dL (47.7% had hemoglobin < or = 12 g/dL; 8.9% had hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dL). Prevalence of anemia was strongly associated with declining glomerular filtration rate. Percentage of patients with hemoglobin < or = 12 g/dL increased from 26.7% to 75.5% when glomerular filtration rate decreased from > or = 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 to < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Prevalence of hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dL increased substantially from 5.2% to 27.2% when glomerular filtration rate diminished from > or = 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 to < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. After controlling for other patient characteristics associated with increased prevalence of anemia, the prevalence odds ratio for hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dL was 0.54 (0.49-0.60) and for hemoglobin < or = 12 g/dL was 0.68 (0.65-0.72), with each 10-mL/min/1.73 m2 increase in glomerular filtration rate. Predictors of anemia: diabetes, female sex, and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Anemia was present in 47.7% of 5222 predialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. Prevalence of anemia increased as kidney function decreased. Certain subgroups are at increased risk for anemia.