The evolving experience using everolimus in clinical transplantation.

Everolimus is a derivative of sirolimus, a macrocyclic lactone, originally isolated from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. Both everolimus and sirolimus have a similar mechanism of action, exerting potent inhibition of growth factor-induced proliferation of lymphocytes, as well as other hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells of mesenchymal origin. Each agent complexes with the FK506 binding protein 12 to inhibit cyclin dependent kinase(s), collectively termed the target of rapamycin (TOR), causing G1-S phase cell cycle arrest. Safety and efficacy have been documented in large-scale, blinded, randomized, international clinical renal and cardiac transplant trials. Everolimus is more hydrophilic, exhibits a shorter elimination half-life (approximately 30 hours), and demonstrates greater relative bioavailability compared to sirolimus. However, similar to the calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus, everolimus is biotransformed by the cytochrome P450, 3A4 isozyme. Also similar to sirolimus, clinical experiences identified biologically relevant side effects including hyperlipidemia and exacerbation of cyclosporine (CsA)-associated nephrotoxicity. However, also similar to sirolimus, accumulating evidence suggests that the hyperlipidemia can be controlled and the CsA-associated renal effects appear reduced with a low incidence of acute rejection when everolimus is administered in combination with reduced CsA doses. The experience using everolimus in cardiac transplantation has also provided potentially important insights into the consequences of antiproliferative effects on vascular smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts where reduction in intimal expansion was identified by intravascular coronary ultrasound examination among those patients receiving everolimus. Therefore, available results suggest that the introduction of everolimus as the newest TOR inhibitor should enhance therapeutic options for immunosuppression after organ transplantation.

Sirolimus-based immunosuppression with reduce dose cyclosporine or tacrolimus after renal transplantation.

Sirolimus (SRL), a fermentation product of Streptomyces hygroscopicus, complexes with the FKBP12 to inhibit cyclin dependent kinase(s), collectively termed the target of rapamycin (TOR), causing G(1)-S phase cell cycle arrest. Safety and efficacy have been documented in clinical renal transplantation, but concerns were raised due to important biologically relevant side effects. Hyperlipidemia was identified, beginning with early clinical experiences, and the unexpected findings that SRL may exacerbate CsA associated nephrotoxicity was observed during the pivotal phase III studies. This report details results of our experience using SRL (target trough concentration, 10-15 ng/mL) with low dose CsA (target trough concentration, 50-100 ng/mL), seeking to determine whether this approach might provide effective immunosuppression while reducing associated nephrotoxicity. Among 121 renal transplant recipients, 62 received the SRL based regimen and 59 received MMF with all patients receiving CsA and prednisone. Similar to earlier clinical experiences, hematopoeitic abnormalities and hyperlipidemia were observed among patients who received SRL, and those abnormalities were readily controlled. However, unlike observations from the phase III SRL studies, renal function was not adversely affected. These findings support the growing body of evidence indicating that SRL based immunosuppression in combination low dose calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids is safe, efficacious, and without associated renal toxicity.

Reduced incidence of Epstein-Barr virus-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder using preemptive antiviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) has been observed with increasing frequency consequent to the availability of more effective and potent immunosuppression. Prior work suggested that a peripheral blood monitoring strategy detecting peripheral B lymphoproliferation was effective in the early diagnosis of PTLD among 7 of 179 (3.9%) consecutive transplant recipients. Each of those seven patients received at least one course of antithymocyte globulin, Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin, or OKT3 before developing PTLD. METHODS: To determine whether antiviral prophylaxis might reduce the incidence of PTLD, a subsequent group of 198 consecutive recipients received either ganciclovir or acyclovir during antilymphocyte antibody administration. When the donor or recipient were cytomegalovirus-seropositive, ganciclovir was given; acyclovir was used when both were cytomegalovirus-seronegative. Baseline and protocol posttransplant cell surface profiles were obtained using immunofluorescence and flow cytometry to detect T cells, lymphocyte activation markers, and the CD19 B cell antigen. RESULTS: Demographic factors, including the incidence of recipients more than 50 years of age, non-Caucasians, previous transplantation, and diabetes mellitus, were similar in both groups. Additionally, the number of patients receiving antilymphocyte preparations was similar. However, only one patient (0.5%) from the latter group who received preemptive antiviral therapy developed PTLD. Although elevations in CD19+ B cells preceded clinical PTLD among each of the seven earlier patients, evidence of peripheral B cell proliferation was not demonstrated for the sole patient from the latter group, which suggests a possible effect of antiviral therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic antiviral therapy may reduce the sensitivity of peripheral monitoring for B lymphoproliferation, but the dramatic reduction in PTLD incidence strongly supports its use among transplant recipients at risk.