Pharmacodynamics of unfractionated heparin during and after a hemodialysis session.

BACKGROUND: Anti-Xa activity is used as a clinical guide to anticoagulation with heparin, but heparin dosing regimens for hemodialysis were established before anti-Xa assays were developed; thus, the optimal regimen for heparin dosing was not determined. The aim is to confirm the interesting characteristics of unfractionated heparin pharmacokinetics for hemodialysis anticoagulation, provide insight into the hemorrhagic risk of hemodialysis patients, and determine the dose of unfractionated heparin and its adequate mode of administration. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of the pharmacokinetics of unfractionated heparin performed during and after a 4-hour midweek hemodialysis session. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 35 long-term hemodialysis patients at the Sainte-Marguerite Unit of the Marseille University Hospital, Marseille, France. PREDICTOR: Hemodialysis anticoagulation with continuous unfractionated heparin infusion at a dose of 50 IU/kg/session (25 IU/kg/h during the first hour, 12.5 IU/kg during the second and third hours, and stop during the last hour). OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS: Anti-Xa activity was monitored during the 10 hours after the beginning of the hemodialysis session. Levels of 0.3 to 0.7 IU/mL are considered sufficient for anticoagulation. Pharmacokinetics was determined by using a population approach (nonlinear mixed-effects modeling). The final model and corresponding parameter values (including interindividual and residual variability) were used to simulate 1,000 replicates. RESULTS: No case of clotting was recorded. A pharmacokinetic model with 1 compartment and first-order elimination best fitted the data. Terminal half-life was 54 minutes. Median anti-Xa activities were 0.55 IU/mL at peak, 0.25 IU/mL at end of the 4-hour session, and less than 0.1 IU/mL at 90 minutes after the session. We simulated a continuous infusion of the dose of 50 IU/kg for 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. Peak values were 1.1, 0.8, 0.6, and 0.5 IU/mL, respectively. Values at the end of the session were 0.12, 0.18, 0.3, and 0.5 IU/mL, respectively. Values became less than 0.1 IU/mL at 15, 60, 105, and 120 minutes after the session, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Interindividual variability in unfractionated heparin pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: Unfractionated heparin administered by means of a 3-hour continuous infusion for hemodialysis anticoagulation provided an efficient and safe effect that quickly disappeared after the end of the session.

Evaluation of new apolipoprotein C-II and apolipoprotein C-III automatized immunoturbidimetric kits.

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein C-II and apolipoprotein C-III play an important and complex role in plasma triglycerides metabolism, respectively, as inhibitor and activator of lipoprotein lipase. Thus, they appear to be suitable markers for clinical studies of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and related cardiovascular risk. Our aim was to evaluate, for routine analysis, the accuracy to quantify these apolipoprotein in human sera. METHODS: Precision (intra- and inter-run), limit of detection and quantification, linearity, common interferents (lipids, haemoglobin, bilirubin) and reference intervals were determined according to guidelines of the French Society of Clinical Biology and ISO Norm 5725 specifications. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-run CVs were respectively less than 5.0% and 7.5%. Linearities extended from 10.8 mg/L to 112.9 mg/L for apolipoprotein C-II and from 31.8 mg/L to 375.5 mg/L for apolipoprotein C-III. Haemolysis (up to 227.6 micromol/L haemoglobin) and lipemia (up to 19.3 mmol/L triglycerides) do not interfere, contrary to bilirubin, which has a positive effect above 350 micromol/L. Comparison of methods shows good agreement between immunoturbidimetric and electro-immunodiffusion methods for measuring apolipoprotein C-III in 62 samples within a wide range (n = 62, r = 0.954, y = 3.81 x -14.4). CONCLUSION: This study shows the reliability of these kits for measuring apolipoprotein C-II and apolipoprotein C-III in human sera, and their suitability for routine analysis.

Intradialytic parenteral nutrition: comparison of olive oil versus soybean oil-based lipid emulsions.

Lipid, oxidative and inflammatory parameters are frequently altered in dialysis patients and may be worsened by intravenous lipid emulsions (ILE). We assessed the efficacy and tolerance of olive as compared with standard soybean oil-based ILE during intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN). IDPN mixtures containing amino acids, glucose, and either olive oil (OO group, n 17) or soybean oil-based ILE (SO group, n 18) were administered in a 5-week randomized, double-blind study. On days 0 and 35, patients' nutritional status was assessed by BMI, normalized protein catabolic rate, predialytic creatinine, serum albumin and transthyretin; lipid metabolism by plasma LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerols, phospholipids, apo A-I, A-II, B, C-II, C-III, E and lipoprotein (a); oxidative status by alpha-tocopherol, retinol, selenium, glutathione peroxidase, malondialdehyde and advanced oxidized protein products; inflammatory status by serum C-reactive protein, orosomucoid, IL-2 and IL-6. No serious adverse event was observed. Significant changes were observed from day 0 to day 35 (P<0.05): nutritional criteria improved (albumin in OO; albumin, transthyretin and creatinine in SO); LDL-cholesterol, apo B, C-II, C-III and apo A-I/A-II ratio increased in both groups. HDL-cholesterol decreased in OO; apo E increased and lipoprotein (a) decreased in SO; alpha-tocopherol/cholesterol ratio increased in OO; malondialdehyde decreased in both groups; IL-2 increased in both groups. The between-group comparison only showed the following differences: alpha-tocopherol/cholesterol increased in OO; lipoprotein (a) decreased in SO. From these data, it was concluded that OO- and SO-based IDPNs similarly improved nutritional status and influenced plasma lipid, oxidative, inflammatory and immune parameters.

Pharmacokinetics of the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin during 48 h after bolus administration as an anticoagulant in haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The interest of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) regarding bleeding risk is controversial in renal failure patients. In haemodialysis patients, there are very few data on the pharmacokinetics of LMWH after the end of the session. The aim of the study was to evaluate the duration of anticoagulation after bolus administration of the LMWH enoxaparin at the start of haemodialysis. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin were studied during the 48 h following a single bolus injection at the start of the dialysis session in 30 chronic haemodialysis patients. Pharmacokinetics were determined using a population approach (Non Linear Mixed Effects Modelling). RESULTS: A single injection of enoxaparin at 60 U IU/kg (4000 +/- 455 IU) led to an anti-Xa activity higher than 1.2 IU/ml during the first 2 h of the session, and between 0.4 and 1.2 IU during the third and fourth hours. After the end of the session, anti-Xa activity remained higher than 0.4 IU/ml up to 10 h after injection, and higher than 0.1 IU/ml up to 24 h. The pharmacokinetic model showed that only weight improved the predicted vs observed anti-Xa activity plot. The model was used to simulate single and multiple dosing with decreased enoxaparin doses. Whatever the procedure, anti-Xa activity remained high (>0.22 +/- 0.99 UI/ml) up to 12 h after the start of the dialysis session. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that haemodialysis patients receiving the LMWH enoxaparin during dialysis are at risk of bleeding up to 10 h after the injection.