Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 51(4): 568-72, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26691423

RESUMO

There is significant variability in the serum concentrations of tacrolimus attained early post transplant due to drug interactions and genomic variation. We evaluated whether tacrolimus concentrations early post transplant correlated with incidence of acute GvHD in 120 consecutive patients allografted with a uniform reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. All patients received standard prophylaxis with oral tacrolimus and IV methotrexate. The primary variable of interest was mean weekly tacrolimus concentrations in the initial 4 weeks post transplant. In multivariate analysis, week 1 tacrolimus concentration was an independent predictor of acute grade 2-4 GvHD (hazard ratio (HR), 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.84-0.97; P<0.01). This association was driven by a lower risk of acute grade 2-4 GvHD in patients with week 1 tacrolimus concentrations >12 ng/mL (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.88; P=0.02). Week 1 tacrolimus concentrations were not associated with chronic GvHD, relapse or overall survival. Lower tacrolimus concentrations at weeks 2, 3 and 4 were not associated with a higher incidence of GvHD. In summary, we found that higher tacrolimus concentrations during the first week after allografting with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen were associated with significantly reduced risk of acute grade 2-4 GvHD without increasing risk of relapse.


Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Doenças Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Tacrolimo , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Doença Aguda , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Aloenxertos , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/sangue , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/mortalidade , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Doenças Hematológicas/sangue , Doenças Hematológicas/mortalidade , Doenças Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/farmacocinética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem , Tacrolimo/farmacocinética , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 49(4): 477-84, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24419521

RESUMO

With broadening indications, more options for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and improvement in survival, the number of long-term HCT survivors is expected to increase steadily. Infertility is a frequent problem that long-term HCT survivors and their partners face and it can negatively impact on the quality of life. The most optimal time to address fertility issues is before the onset of therapy for the underlying disease; however, fertility preservation should also be addressed before HCT in all children and patients of reproductive age, with referral to a reproductive specialist for patients interested in fertility preservation. In vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation and ovarian tissue banking are acceptable methods for fertility preservation in adult women/pubertal females. Sperm banking is the preferred method for adult men/pubertal males. Frequent barriers to fertility preservation in HCT recipients may include the perception of lack of time to preserve fertility given an urgency to move ahead with transplant, lack of patient-physician discussion because of several factors (for example, time constraints, lack of knowledge), inadequate access to reproductive specialists, and costs and lack of insurance coverage for fertility preservation. There is a need to raise awareness in the medical community about fertility preservation in HCT recipients.


Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/efeitos adversos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Transplante Homólogo
3.
Leukemia ; 28(3): 658-65, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23989431

RESUMO

The efficacy of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is uncertain. We analyzed 197 adults with Ph+ ALL in first complete remission; 67 patients receiving RIC were matched with 130 receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for age, donor type and HCT year. Over 75% received pre-HCT tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), mostly imatinib; 39% (RIC) and 49% (MAC) were minimal residual disease (MRD)(neg) pre-HCT. At a median 4.5 years follow-up, 1-year transplant-related mortality (TRM) was lower in RIC (13%) than MAC (36%; P=0.001) while the 3-year relapse rate was 49% in RIC and 28% in MAC (P=0.058). Overall survival (OS) was similar (RIC 39% (95% confidence interval (CI) 27-52) vs 35% (95% CI 27-44); P=0.62). Patients MRD(pos) pre-HCT had higher risk of relapse with RIC vs MAC (hazard ratio (HR) 1.97; P=0.026). However, patients receiving pre-HCT TKI in combination with MRD negativity pre-RIC HCT had superior OS (55%) compared with a similar MRD population after MAC (33%; P=0.0042). In multivariate analysis, RIC lowered TRM (HR 0.6; P=0.057), but absence of pre-HCT TKI (HR 1.88; P=0.018), RIC (HR 1.891; P=0.054) and pre-HCT MRD(pos) (HR 1.6; P=0.070) increased relapse risk. RIC is a valid alternative strategy for Ph+ ALL patients ineligible for MAC and MRD(neg) status is preferred pre-HCT.


Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea , Neoplasia Residual , Cromossomo Filadélfia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/cirurgia , Proteínas Tirosina Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Indução de Remissão , Taxa de Sobrevida , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Adulto , Animais , Feminino , Cobaias , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/patologia , Transplante Homólogo , Adulto Jovem
4.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 48(8): 1091-7, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23419436

RESUMO

Physician practice variation may be a barrier to informing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients about fertility preservation (FP) options. We surveyed HCT physicians in the United States to evaluate FP knowledge, practices, perceptions and barriers. Of the 1035 physicians invited, 185 completed a 29-item web-survey. Most respondents demonstrated knowledge of FP issues and discussed and felt comfortable discussing FP. However, only 55% referred patients to an infertility specialist. Most did not provide educational materials to patients and only 35% felt that available materials were relevant for HCT. Notable barriers to discussing FP included perception that patients were too ill to delay transplant (63%), patients were already infertile from prior therapy (92%) and time constraints (41%). Pediatric HCT physicians and physicians with access to an infertility specialist were more likely to discuss FP and to discuss FP even when prognosis was poor. On analyses that considered physician demographics, knowledge and perceptions as predictors of referral for FP, access to an infertility specialist and belief that patients were interested in FP were observed to be significant. We highlight variation in HCT physician perceptions and practices regarding FP. Physicians are generally interested in discussing fertility issues with their patients but lack educational materials.


Assuntos
Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Preservação da Fertilidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Infertilidade/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
5.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 47(8): 1082-6, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22080969

RESUMO

We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients undergoing first-line treatment for mantle cell lymphoma with R-HyperCVAD, with or without rituximab (R) maintenance or auto-SCT. The primary study end point was PFS; secondary end point was overall survival.Median follow up for all patients was 3.3 years. Median age was 54 years, and 95% (n=42) were stage III or IV at diagnosis. In all, 17 patients underwent consolidative auto-SCT and 12 patients received R maintenance. The overall response rate was 95%, with 91% achieving complete response (CR). Median PFS for all patients was 3.5 years. Median PFS was 2.3 years for patients treated with R-HyperCVAD alone vs 3.9 years (P=0.02) with R-HyperCVAD+ R maintenance and 4.5 years (P=0.01) with R-HyperCVAD+ auto-SCT. For patients who did not achieve CR at interim staging, PFS for R-HyperCVAD alone was 1.4 years vs not reached for R-HyperCVAD+ consolidation (either R maintenance or auto-SCT) (P=0.02). PFS for patients with CR at interim staging was 3.3 years vs not reached (P=0.04) after consolidation. Our data suggest potential improvement in PFS when R-HyperCVAD is consolidated with either R maintenance or auto-SCT. This benefit appears particularly significant in those patients who do not achieve CR at interim restaging.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/mortalidade , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Linfoma de Célula do Manto/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rituximab , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante Autólogo
6.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 41(5): 483-93, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18026156

RESUMO

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) offers the only hope for cure for many adults with acute leukemia. Unfortunately, many patients relapse and die of their disease even after transplantation. Although in some cases, allogeneic SCT is effective because the intensive conditioning therapy eradicates all malignant cells, it has long been recognized that the adoptive transfer of donor immunity plays a critically important role in the induction and maintenance of remission. Recognition of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect of allogeneic SCT has prompted attempts at remission re-induction by adoptive immunotherapy with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) in patients with relapsed disease after allogeneic SCT. In some cases, DLI-induced remissions are sustained and patients cured when no other treatment modality was effective. This review discusses the rationale, biology, complications and future applications of DLI in acute leukemia patients after allogeneic SCT.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Adulto , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Efeito Enxerto vs Leucemia , Humanos , Transfusão de Leucócitos/métodos
7.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 38(3): 211-6, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16770314

RESUMO

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 50 lymphoma patients (Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) who had an 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan after at least two cycles of salvage chemotherapy and before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) at our institution. The patients were categorized into FDG-PET negative (N = 32) and positive (N = 18) groups. The median follow-up after ASCT was 19 months (range: 3-59). In the FDG-PET-negative group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19 months (range: 2-59) with 15 (54%) patients without progression at 12 months after ASCT. The median overall survival (OS) for this group was not reached. In the FDG-PET-positive group, the median PFS was 5 months (range: 1-19) with only one (7%) patient without progression at 12 months after ASCT. The median OS was 19 months (range: 1-34). In the FDG-PET-negative group, chemotherapy-resistant patients by CT-based criteria had a comparable outcome to those with chemotherapy-sensitive disease. A positive FDG-PET scan after salvage chemotherapy and prior ASCT indicates an extremely poor chance of durable response after ASCT.


Assuntos
Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Doença de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/métodos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Doença de Hodgkin/terapia , Humanos , Linfoma não Hodgkin/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia de Salvação/métodos , Análise de Sobrevida , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 35(9): 921-6, 2005 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15765118

RESUMO

Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) harnesses the graft-versus-tumor effect while minimizing regimen-related toxicity, and can result in donor chimerism and remission. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infections are major complications after sibling NST. Toxicity of unrelated-donor (UD) NST and the most appropriate GVHD prophylaxis in this setting remain poorly defined. We describe 25 patients who received UD-NST conditioned with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. The first six patients received cyclosporine (Cs) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n=5) or methotrexate (MTX) (n=1) as GVHD prophylaxis (group 1) and all developed grade III-IV acute GVHD. The next 19 patients received the same conditioning regimen with the addition of alemtuzumab, and all received Cs/MTX post-transplant. Engraftment and donor chimerism were achieved in all but one evaluable patient. In all, 15 patients died: five of six deaths in group 1 were attributable to acute GVHD, while deaths in group 2 were due to infection or progressive disease (P=0.05). The combination of Cs/MMF is inadequate GVHD prophylaxis for UD-NST. The use of Cs, MTX, and alemtuzumab eliminated severe acute GVHD; its impact on response merits further study.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/prevenção & controle , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/terapia , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Alemtuzumab , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticorpos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/complicações , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/mortalidade , Humanos , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/complicações , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Micofenólico/administração & dosagem , Quimeras de Transplante , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Vidarabina/administração & dosagem
9.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 31(3): 145-55, 2003 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12621474

RESUMO

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) represents a spectrum of Epstein-Barr virus-related (EBV) clinical diseases, from a benign mononucleosis-like illness to a fulminant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. In the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, PTLD is an often-fatal complication occurring relatively early after transplant. Risk factors for the development of PTLD are well established, and include HLA-mismatching, T-cell depletion, and the use of antilymphocyte antibodies as conditioning or treatment of graft-versus-host disease. Early recognition of PTLD is particularly important in the SCT setting, because PTLD in these patients tends to be rapidly progressive. Familiarity with the clinical features of PTLD and a heightened level of suspicion are critical for making the diagnosis. Surveillance techniques with EBV antibody titers and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may have a role in some high-risk settings. Immune-based therapies such as monoclonal anti-B-cell antibodies, interferon-alpha, and EBV-specific donor T cells, either as treatment for PTLD or as prophylaxis in high-risk patients, represent promising new directions in the treatment of this disease.


Assuntos
Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/efeitos adversos , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Depleção Linfocítica , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/classificação , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Linfócitos T/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...