Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
3.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 2(2): 109-17, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24222819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) reducing ischaemic complications and the development of heart failure, thus potentially changing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) requirements. Little information exists about patients with ACS requiring IMV in the current era. We aimed to analyze IMV requirements and characteristics of ACS patients treated under current recommendations (including a high rate of PCI). METHODS: Baseline characteristics, indications for IMV, management and in-hospital and mid-term clinical course were analyzed prospectively in a consecutive series of patients with ACS admitted to a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: We included 1821 patients, of which 106 (5.8%) required IMV. Mean follow-up was 347 days. PCI was performed in 84% of cases. Patients with IMV had more comorbidities, worse left ventricular function and more unstable hemodynamic parameters on admission. In-hospital mortality in patients requiring IMV was 29%. These patients also had higher mid-term mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 6.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.49-9.64; p 0.001). The most common indication for IMV was cardiopulmonary arrest (CA) (65; 61%), followed by pulmonary oedema (27; 26%) and shock (14; 13.2%). Patients with CA were younger, with better hemodynamic parameters at admission, more favourable coronary anatomy and higher rates of PCI. There were no significant differences in overall mortality between the three groups. The main cause of death in CA patients was persistent vegetative state. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in patients with ACS requiring IMV remained high despite a high rate of PCI. Baseline characteristics, management and clinical course were different according to the reason for IMV. The most common cause for IMV requirement was CA.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Edema Pulmonar/terapia , Respiração Artificial/mortalidade , Choque/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Thromb Res ; 132(6): 652-8, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24112751

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The CRUSADE bleeding risk score (CBRS) accurately predicts major bleeding in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction NSTEMI patients. However, little information exists about its application in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction STEMI. We aimed to assess the ability of CBRS to predict in-hospital major bleeding in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively analyzed consecutive STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital complications and mid term mortality were recorded. Major bleeding was defined by the CRUSADE definition. Predictive ability of the CBRS was assessed by logistic regression method and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: We included 1064 patients (mean age 63years). Mean CBRS value was 24. Most of patients (740/1064 (69.6%)) were in the two lowest risk quintiles of CBRS. Incidence of in-hospital major bleeding was 33/1064 (3.1%). The rates of in-hospital bleeding across the quintiles of risk groups were 0.4% (very low risk), 2.6% (low), 4.6% (moderate), 7.2% (high), and 13.4% (very high) (p 0.001). AUC was 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.87 p 0.001). In patients with radial access angiography (n=621) AUC was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.65-0.97). Mean follow up was 344days. Patients with bleeding events had higher mortality during follow up (HR 6.91; 95% CI 3.72-12.82; p 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our patients had a significantly lower bleeding risk as compared to CRUSADE NSTEMI population. CBRS accurately predicted major in-hospital bleeding in this different clinical scenario, including patients with radial artery approach.


Assuntos
Hemorragia/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...