Itch receptor MRGPRX4 interacts with the receptor activity-modifying proteins.

Cholestatic itch is a severe and debilitating symptom in liver diseases with limited treatment options. The class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) Mas-related GPCR subtype X4 (MRGPRX4) has been identified as a receptor for bile acids, which are potential cholestatic pruritogens. An increasing number of GPCRs have been shown to interact with receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs), which can modulate different aspects of GPCR biology. Using a combination of multiplexed immunoassay and proximity ligation assay, we show that MRGPRX4 interacts with RAMPs. The interaction of MRGPRX4 with RAMP2, but not RAMP1 or 3, causes attenuation of basal and agonist-dependent signaling, which correlates with a decrease of MRGPRX4 cell surface expression as measured using a quantitative NanoBRET pulse-chase assay. Finally, we use AlphaFold Multimer to predict the structure of the MRGPRX4-RAMP2 complex. The discovery that RAMP2 regulates MRGPRX4 may have direct implications for future drug development for cholestatic itch.

Elucidating the Interactome of G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Receptor Activity-Modifying Proteins.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to interact with several other classes of integral membrane proteins that modulate their biology and pharmacology. However, the extent of these interactions and the mechanisms of their effects are not well understood. For example, one class of GPCR-interacting proteins, receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs), comprise three related and ubiquitously expressed single-transmembrane span proteins. The RAMP family was discovered more than two decades ago, and since then GPCR-RAMP interactions and their functional consequences on receptor trafficking and ligand selectivity have been documented for several secretin (class B) GPCRs, most notably the calcitonin receptor-like receptor. Recent bioinformatics and multiplexed experimental studies suggest that GPCR-RAMP interactions might be much more widespread than previously anticipated. Recently, cryo-electron microscopy has provided high-resolution structures of GPCR-RAMP-ligand complexes, and drugs have been developed that target GPCR-RAMP complexes. In this review, we provide a summary of recent advances in techniques that allow the discovery of GPCR-RAMP interactions and their functional consequences and highlight prospects for future advances. We also provide an up-to-date list of reported GPCR-RAMP interactions based on a review of the current literature. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) have emerged as modulators of many aspects of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)biology and pharmacology. The application of new methodologies to study membrane protein-protein interactions suggests that RAMPs interact with many more GPCRs than had been previously known. These findings, especially when combined with structural studies of membrane protein complexes, have significant implications for advancing GPCR-targeted drug discovery and the understanding of GPCR pharmacology, biology, and regulation.

Purinergic Receptors Crosstalk with CCR5 to Amplify Ca2+ Signaling.

Many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) signal through more than one subtype of heterotrimeric G proteins. For example, the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5), which serves as a co-receptor to facilitate cellular entry of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1), normally signals through the heterotrimeric G protein, Gi. However, CCR5 also exhibits G protein signaling bias and certain chemokine analogs can cause a switch to Gq pathways to induce Ca2+ signaling. We want to understand how much of the Ca2+ signaling from Gi-coupled receptors is due to G protein promiscuity and how much is due to transactivation and crosstalk with other receptors. We propose a possible mechanism underlying the apparent switching between different G protein signaling pathways. We show that chemokine-mediated Ca2+ flux in HEK293T cells expressing CCR5 can be primed and enhanced by ATP pretreatment. In addition, agonist-dependent lysosomal exocytosis results in the release of ATP to the extracellular milieu, which amplifies cellular signaling networks. ATP is quickly degraded via ADP and AMP to adenosine. ATP, ADP and adenosine activate different cell surface purinergic receptors. Endogenous Gq-coupled purinergic P2Y receptors amplify Ca2+ signaling and allow for Gi- and Gq-coupled receptor signaling pathways to converge. Associated secretory release of GPCR ligands, such as chemokines, opioids, and monoamines, should also lead to concomitant release of ATP with a synergistic effect on Ca2+ signaling. Our results suggest that crosstalk between ATP-activated purinergic receptors and other Gi-coupled GPCRs is an important cooperative mechanism to amplify the intracellular Ca2+ signaling response.

Multiplexed analysis of the secretin-like GPCR-RAMP interactome.

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) have been shown to modulate the functions of several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), but potential direct interactions among the three known RAMPs and hundreds of GPCRs have never been investigated. Focusing mainly on the secretin-like family of GPCRs, we engineered epitope-tagged GPCRs and RAMPs, and developed a multiplexed suspension bead array (SBA) immunoassay to detect GPCR-RAMP complexes from detergent-solubilized lysates. Using 64 antibodies raised against the native proteins and 4 antibodies targeting the epitope tags, we mapped the interactions among 23 GPCRs and 3 RAMPs. We validated nearly all previously reported secretin-like GPCR-RAMP interactions, and also found previously unidentified RAMP interactions with additional secretin-like GPCRs, chemokine receptors, and orphan receptors. The results provide a complete interactome of secretin-like GPCRs with RAMPs. The SBA strategy will be useful to search for additional GPCR-RAMP complexes and other interacting membrane protein pairs in cell lines and tissues.

High-Affinity Binding of Chemokine Analogs that Display Ligand Bias at the HIV-1 Coreceptor CCR5.

The chemokine receptor CCR5 is a drug target to prevent transmission of HIV/AIDS. We studied four analogs of the native chemokine regulated, on activation, normal T-cell-expressed, and secreted (RANTES) (CCL5) that have anti-HIV potencies of around 25 pM, which is more than four orders of magnitude higher than that of RANTES itself. It has been hypothesized that the ultrahigh potency of the analogs is due to their ability to bind populations of receptors not accessible to native chemokines. To test this hypothesis, we developed a homogeneous dual-color fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy assay for saturation- and competition-binding experiments. The fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy assay has the advantage that it does not rely on competition with radioactively labeled native chemokines used in conventional assays. We prepared site-specifically labeled fluorescent analogs using native chemical ligation of synthetic peptides, followed by bioorthogonal fluorescent labeling. We engineered a mammalian cell expression construct to provide fluorescently labeled CCR5, which was purified using a tandem immunoaffinity and size-exclusion chromatography approach to obtain monomeric fluorescent CCR5 in detergent solution. We found subnanomolar binding affinities for the two analogs 5P12-RANTES and 5P14-RANTES and about 20-fold reduced affinities for PSC-RANTES and 6P4-RANTES. Using homologous and heterologous competition experiments with unlabeled chemokine analogs, we conclude that the analogs all bind at the same binding site, whereas the native chemokines (RANTES and MIP-1α) fail to displace bound fluorescent analogs even at tens of micromolar concentrations. Our results can be rationalized with de novo structural models of the N-terminal tails of the synthetic chemokines that adopt a different binding mode as compared to the parent compound.

Receptor Structures for a Caldron of Cannabinoids.

Structures of the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) in complex with an "ultrapotent" synthetic cannabinoid and its G protein (Krishna Kumar et al., 2019) and CB2 in complex with a new rationally designed inverse agonist (Li et al., 2019) provide unique snapshots of the molecular pharmacology of cannabinoids.

Detection of Concordance between Transcriptional Levels of GPCRs and Receptor-Activity-Modifying Proteins.

A recent phylogenetic analysis showed global co-evolution of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and receptor-activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) suggesting global interactions between these two protein families. Experimental validation of these findings is challenging because in humans whereas there are only three genes encoding RAMPs, there are about 800 genes encoding GPCRs. Here, we report an experimental approach to evaluate GPCR-RAMP interactions. As a proof-of-concept experiment, we over-expressed RAMP2 in HEK293T cells and evaluated the effect on the transcriptional levels of 14 representative GPCRs that were selected based on the earlier phylogenetic analysis. We utilized a multiplexed error-correcting fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) method to detect message levels for individual GPCRs in single cells. The MERFISH results showed changes in GPCR message levels with RAMP2 over-expression in a concordant pattern that was predicted by the earlier phylogenetic analysis. These results provide additional evidence that GPCR-RAMP interactions are more widespread than previously appreciated and that these interactions have functional consequences.

G protein subtype-specific signaling bias in a series of CCR5 chemokine analogs.

Chemokines and some chemical analogs of chemokines prevent cellular HIV-1 entry when bound to the HIV-1 coreceptors C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) or C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), which are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The ideal HIV-1 entry blocker targeting the coreceptors would display ligand bias and avoid activating G protein-mediated pathways that lead to inflammation. We compared CCR5-dependent activation of second messenger pathways in a single cell line. We studied two endogenous chemokines [RANTES (also known as CCL5) and MIP-1α (also known as CCL3)] and four chemokine analogs of RANTES (5P12-, 5P14-, 6P4-, and PSC-RANTES). We found that CCR5 signaled through both Gi/o and Gq/11 IP1 accumulation and Ca2+ flux arose from Gq/11 activation, rather than from Gßγ subunit release after Gi/o activation as had been previously proposed. The 6P4- and PSC-RANTES analogs were superagonists for Gq/11 activation, whereas the 5P12- and 5P14-RANTES analogs displayed a signaling bias for Gi/o These results demonstrate that RANTES analogs elicit G protein subtype-specific signaling bias and can cause CCR5 to couple preferentially to Gq/11 rather than to Gi/o signaling pathways. We propose that G protein subtype-specific signaling bias may be a general feature of GPCRs that can couple to more than one G protein family.

GPCRs globally coevolved with receptor activity-modifying proteins, RAMPs.

Receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) are widely expressed in human tissues and, in some cases, have been shown to affect surface expression or ligand specificity of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, whether RAMP-GPCR interactions are widespread, and the nature of their functional consequences, remains largely unknown. In humans, there are three RAMPs and over 800 expressed GPCRs, making direct experimental approaches challenging. We analyzed relevant genomic data from all currently available sequenced organisms. We discovered that RAMPs and GPCRs tend to have orthologs in the same species and have correlated phylogenetic trees to the same extent, or higher than other interacting protein pairs that play key roles in cellular signaling. In addition, the resulting RAMP-GPCR interaction map suggests that RAMP1 and RAMP3 interact with the same set of GPCRs, which implies functional redundancy. We next analyzed human transcriptomes and found expression correlation for GPCRs and RAMPs. Our results suggest global coevolution of GPCRs and RAMPS and support the hypothesis that GPCRs interact globally with RAMPs in cellular signaling pathways.

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Virulence Gene Regulation.

Coordinated expression of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence genes enables the bacterium to cause hemorrhagic colitis and the complication known as hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Horizontally acquired genes and those common to E. coli contribute to the disease process, and increased virulence gene expression is correlated with more severe disease in humans. Researchers have gained considerable knowledge about how the type III secretion system, secreted effectors, adhesin molecules, and the Shiga toxins are regulated by environmental signals and multiple genetic pathways. Also emergent from the data is an understanding of how enterohemorrhagic E. coli regulates response to acid stress, the role of flagellar motility, and how passage through the human host and bovine intestinal tract causes disease and supports carriage in the cattle reservoir, respectively. Particularly exciting areas of discovery include data suggesting how expression of the myriad effectors is coordinately regulated with their cognate type III secretion system and how virulence is correlated with bacterial metabolism and gut physiology.

Ler interdomain linker is essential for anti-silencing activity in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) expresses a type III secretion system (T3SS) required for pathogenesis. Regulation of the genes encoding the T3SS is complex; two major regulators control transcription, the silencer H-NS, and the related H-NS-like protein Ler. Our laboratory is interested in understanding the molecular differences that distinguish the anti-silencer Ler from H-NS, and how Ler differentially regulates EPEC virulence genes. Here, we demonstrate that mutated Ler proteins either containing H-NS alpha-helices 1 and 2, missing from Ler, or truncated for the 11 aa C-terminal extension compared with the related H-NS protein, did not appreciably alter Ler function. In contrast, mutating the proline at position 92 of Ler, in the conserved C-terminal DNA binding motif, eliminated Ler activity. Inserting 11 H-NS-specific amino acids, 11 alanines or 6 alanines into the Ler linker severely impaired the ability of Ler to increase LEE5 transcription. To extend our analysis, we constructed six chimeric proteins containing the N terminus, linker region or C terminus of Ler in different combinations with the complementary domains of H-NS, and monitored their in vivo activities. Replacing the Ler linker domain with that of H-NS, or replacing the Ler C-terminal, DNA binding domain with that of H-NS eliminated the ability of Ler to increase transcription at the LEE5 promoter. Thus, the linker and C-terminal domains of Ler and H-NS are not functionally equivalent. Conversely, replacing the H-NS linker region with that of Ler caused increased transcription at LEE5 in a strain deleted for hns. In summary, the interdomain linker specific to Ler is necessary for anti-silencing activity in EPEC.