The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma by continuous intravenous infusion of recombinant interleukin-2.

Between March 1989 and June 1990, 133 patients were treated with interleukin 2 (rIL-2) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a multicentre open non-randomised study. The results show an objective response rate of 14% (95% confidence interval 8-21) with 4 patients achieving a complete remission. This is in keeping with the data from previous studies using rIL-2 by continuous infusion. It is of interest that 87% of objective responses occurred in hospitals that entered 5 or more patients.

A comparison of 2 modes of administration of recombinant interleukin-2: continuous intravenous infusion alone versus subcutaneous administration plus interferon alpha in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare 2 treatment modalities with recombinant Interleukin-2 (rIL-2) for patients with advanced Renal Cell carcinoma (RCC): continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) alone versus subcutaneous (s/c) rIL-2 + Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data have been collected on 425 patients with RCC, treated CIV rIL-2 alone, (225 patients), or rIL-2 by the s/c route (200 patients). Patients receiving s/c rIL-2 also received s/c IFN-alpha both drugs being administered on an outpatient basis. Patients receiving CIV rIL-2 were treated as inpatients. Patient eligibility criteria were similar on all studies, and included patients with progressive, advanced disease, but with an ambulatory performance status. RESULTS: The overall response rate for the CIV schedules was not significantly different from the s/c regimens: 15% (95% confidence limits (CL) 10-20%) vs 20% (95%CL 14-26%) with 4% CR in both approaches. Durable responses were seen in both CIV and s/c schedules and there was no evidence of a significant difference in survival in multivariate analysis. There was however an important shift in the toxicity profile. The s/c regimens do not induce a clinically detectable capillary leak syndrome, which is the dose limiting toxicity for CIV regimens. CONCLUSION: Although the introduction of CIV regimens of rIL-2 was a major step forward compared to high-dose bolus, because most patients could be treated in a normal oncology ward, the s/c schedule of rIL-2 + IFN-alpha offers the possibility of outpatient (home) therapy, with no evidence of a reduction in efficacy.

Continuous infusion of recombinant interleukin-2 with or without autologous lymphokine activated killer cells for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Data have been analysed for 327 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving a continuous infusion of recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL-2) alone (225 patients) or rIL-2 plus lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells (102) on a normal oncology ward. Eligibility criteria were uniform across protocols, all patients having advanced progressive disease, but with an ambulatory performance status. The baseline characteristics of patients receiving rIL-2 alone did not differ significantly from those receiving LAK, with the exception that the LAK treated patients had a better performance status. Despite similar treatment intensity, toxicity was more severe in the patients receiving LAK. The addition of LAK did not lead to higher response rates or to prolonged response duration, progression-free survival or survival. This review confirms the activity of rIL-2 for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and demonstrates that the addition of LAK cells does not lead to increased efficacy.

Recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) with flavone acetic acid (FAA) in advanced malignant melanoma: a phase II study.

Recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL-2) and flavone acetic acid (FAA) were used to treat 34 patients with progressing metastatic melanoma. Five patients had solely non-visceral disease and the median number of organ sites involved was two. Five doses of rIL-2 were given, the first dose intrasplenically via a femoral artery catheter with a further dose 4 h later i.v. and the other doses i.v. on alternate days. The rIL-2 dose was 11 x 10(6) Cetus units m-2; the day before rIL-2, FAA (4.8 G m-2) was given as a 6 h i.v. infusion, in order to enhance further killer cell activity. A total of three courses at 21-day intervals was planned and 74 courses in all were given. Despite the high dose of rIL-2 and the potential overlapping toxicity affecting blood pressure with the addition of FAA, side-effects were generally mild. There were only five episodes of grade 4 toxicity: one of ventricular tachycardia and four other episodes of transient biochemical or haematological disturbance. Grade 3 hypotension or hypertension occurred on 22 courses but again was transient. No patient required intensive care facilities. Five patients had tumour response, one being complete. Responses occurred in pulmonary and hepatic metastases, but mainly in non-visceral sites. Eleven patients remain alive at 6-17 months and in five there is no relapse or progression of disease. Despite the impressive results in animal tumour models, the addition of FAA to rIL-2 in the present study has not markedly improved results over rIL-2 alone.