The safety concerns regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver cancer patients rising mainly from CHB.

Aim: To analyze the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in primary liver cancer patients and to identify the risk factors for immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Methods: The study enrolled 106 patients with primary liver cancer, including 81 with hepatocellular carcinoma and 25 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. We analyzed the differences between groups in irAE occurrence, including those with and without targeted drugs and those who received interventional therapy. Results: The incidence of irAEs was 39%, with thyroid function, liver function, and skin events being the most common. There was no correlation among irAE incidence and the liver cancer type, stage, or severity; grade of Child-Pugh score; and Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer classification. However, being overweight was a significant risk factor for irAEs, correlating with high body mass index. The combination of targeted drugs and/or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy did not increase the incidence of irAEs. Conclusion: Being overweight is a potential risk factor for irAEs in primary liver cancer patients. However, there is no correlation between irAE incidence and the liver cancer type, stage, or severity or a combination of targeted drugs or transarterial chemoembolization therapy.

The 20 years transition of clinical characteristics and metabolic risk factors in primary liver cancer patients from China.

Background: The clinical characteristics of primary liver cancer (PLC) patients are changing, maybe due to hepatitis viral vaccination and lifestyle changes, etc. The linkage between these changes and outcomes among these PLCs has not yet been fully elucidated. Methods: It was identified total of 1691 PLC cases diagnosed between 2000 ~ 2020. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to determine the connections between the clinical presentations and their close risk factor(s) from PLC patients. Results: The average age of PLC patients increased gradually from 52.74 ± 0.5 years in 2000 ~ 2004 to 58.63 ± 0.44 years in 2017 ~ 2020, accompanied by an increased proportion of females from 11.11% to 22.46%, and non-viral hepatitis-related PLC was raised from 1.5% to 22.35%. 840 (49.67%) PLC patients with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) < 20ng/mL (AFP-negative). The mortality was 285 (16.85%) or 532 (31.46%) PLC patients with alanine transaminase (ALT) between 40 ~ 60 IU/L or ALT > 60 IU/L. The PLC patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes or dyslipidemia also increased from 4.29% or 11.1% in 2000 ~ 2004 to 22.34% or 46.83% in 2017 ~ 2020. The survival period of the PLC patients with normoglycemia or normolipidemic was 2.18 or 3.14 folds longer than those patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes or hyperlipidemia (P<0.05). Conclusions: It was gradually increased that age, the proportion of females, non-viral hepatitis-related causes, AFP-negative, and abnormal glucose/lipids among PLC patients. Proper control of glucose/lipids or ALT may improve the prognosis of PLCs.

A novel model based on qAnti-HBc and conventional biomarkers for identifying significant liver injury among CHB patients with ALT ≤ ULN.

BACKGROUND: Antiviral therapy is not routinely recommended for CHB patients with ALT ≤ ULN (CHB-NALT), based on current international guidelines. However, it is debatable if antiviral treatment should be offered for CHB-NALT patients, because significant liver injury is observed from liver biopsy of some CHB-NALT patients. Quantification of anti-HBc (qAnti-HBc) can predict antiviral response in CHB patients, while its role in CHB-NALT patients remains to be explored. AIM: To determine if it is reliable that the novel non-invasive model based mainly on qAnti-HBc and other conventional biomarkers for providing objective value among CHB-NALT patients with antiviral therapy, in direct comparison with liver biopsy. METHODS: 542 or 110 liver biopsied CHB-NALT patients from 2015 to 2020 or in 2021 were included in training set or validation set. Circulating IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, IL-12p70, IL-17, TNF and IFNα were determined in the training set. A non-invasive model was developed based on qAnti-HBc and other conventional biomarkers. RESULTS: Among 423/542 (78%) patients with significant liver injury in the training set, 47% were in grey-zone. Circulating IL-1ß, IL-12p70, IL-17 in the CHB-NALT patients with liver injury was significantly higher than these without liver injury in the training set (p < 0.01). No significant difference of IL-1ß, IL-12p70, IL-17 was observed between CHB-NALT patients with significant liver injury and active CHB with elevated ALT in the training set. There was inverse correlation between liver injury grades and IFNα, IL-4, or IL-2 in these patients (p < 0.05). Serum qAnti-HBc level was significantly higher with CHB-NALT patients with liver injury than these without in the training set (P < 0.01). ALT/ULN, AST, PLT and qAnti-HBc were identified as independent predictors for significant liver injury. Furthermore, our current model demonstrated a good performance in predicting significant liver injury, i.e. AUROCs of 0.95 or 0.86 in training set or validation set. The model cut-off value for anti-viral therapy at ≥1.471. CONCLUSIONS: qAnti-HBc appears to be well correlated with the hepatic damage, in direct comparison with liver biopsy from CHB-NALT patients. The novel model developed seems to be reliable for predicting liver injury in CHB-NALT patients. Such model also provides objective value for decision making of antiviral therapy.

Anti-viral effect in chronic hepatitis B patients with normal or mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Normal/mildly elevated ALT (<2 × ULN) CHB patients are potentially at risk of progression to cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to assess the outcomes of anti-viral therapy for normal/mild elevation of ALT CHB patients. METHODS: CHB patients (n = 432) who have had liver biopsied were determined. It was determined that the outcomes of anti-viral therapy in CHB patients with normal/mild elevation of ALT, in response to nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs) (n = 190) and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) (n = 30) treatment for up to 72 weeks. Non-anti-viral treated patients were used as control (n = 40). RESULTS: There was about 50% of the CHB patients showed hepatic inflammatory necrosis ≥ G2 and/or fibrosis ≥ S2 among >30-years-old. The rate of undetectable HBV DNA in NAs and PEG-IFN groups was ~50%, ~80% or ~90% at week 24, 48 or 72, respectively. HBeAg clearance rate was lower in NAs treated than that in PEG-IFN group at week 48 (6% vs 20%, P < 0.05). ALT normalization rate was increased by 1.18-fold at week 72. HBsAg decline in HBeAg+ patients treated with NAs or PEG-IFN was 0.418 or 1.217 log IU/mL (P < 0.0001) at week 48; whereas HBsAg decline was 0.176 or 0.816 log IU/mL (P < 0.001) in HBeAg- patients. HBsAg at baseline and week 24 were strong predictors of "low HBsAg at week 48". CONCLUSION: Long term anti-viral therapy inhibits HBV replication effectively in ALT<2 × ULN CHB patients. PEG-IFN therapy is recommended for HBeAg+ patients with baseline HBsAg<4.37 log IU/ml and HBeAg- patients with baseline HBsAg<2.66 log IU/ml to achieve "low HBsAg at week 48".

Combination of inflammatory score/liver function and AFP improves the diagnostic accuracy of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), routinely used for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is limited with relatively low sensitivity and high false positivity in HBV-related HCC (HBV-HCC). Thus, an alternative approach was explored to improve specificity/sensitivity for diagnosis of HBV-HCC, using the combination of AFP, inflammatory score, and liver function. METHODS: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) (n = 510) and HBV-HCC (n = 473) patients were identified retrospectively for this study. The diagnostic value of single vs combined biomarkers for HBV-HCC was analyzed, using ROC curve. RESULTS: It was observed that elderliness, male sex, cirrhosis, HBeAg+ or no-antiviral therapy, and elevation of ALT, AST, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and AFP were associated with developing HBV-HCC. However, the cut-off ALT defined by Chinese standard, but not by AASLD, was a risk factor. Interestingly, AFP of HBeAg- HBV-HCC patients without cirrhosis was significantly higher than that of the HBeAg+ patients. AUC values for AFP, ALT, AST, or NLR were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.815-0.862), 0.533 (95% CI: 0.501-0.565), 0.696 (95% CI: 0.666-0.725), or 0.684 (95% CI: 0.654-0.713) with optimal cut-off at 7.21 ng/mL, 43 IU/mL, 38 IU/mL, or 2.61, respectively. Combination of AFP with ALT, AST, and NLR improved the diagnostic performance for HBV-HCC, compared to any of the single biomarkers or any other combinations among these patients (except no-cirrhosis). CONCLUSIONS: Elderliness, male sex, elevated ALT, AST, NLR, AFP, cirrhosis, HBeAg+ , and no-antiviral treatment were independent risk factors for HBV-HCC. AASLD standard of ALT cut-off value may not be suitable for the Chinese population. Regular monitoring of HCC among HBeAg- patients with abnormal AFP may improve the management of HBV-HCC. The diagnostic performance of AFP combined with ALT, AST, and NLR for HBV-HCC was superior to single biomarker or any other combinations among these patients, and its diagnostic equation can be used as useful tool for differentiation of HBV-HCC from CHB.