Utility of the LeFort I Osteotomy in the Acute Management of Midface Trauma.

PURPOSE: Pure and isolated LeFort I, II, and III fractures are rare. Typically, they occur at different levels on each side and may be incomplete in nature, which complicates management. The LeFort I osteotomy is a well-described technique in elective management of midface deformities. However, there is minimal literature on its use in acute trauma. This study describes the use of the LeFort I osteotomy as a surgical maneuver to aid in the reduction of complex midface fractures and the re-establishment of premorbid occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive midface fractures managed at our center from 2008 to 2020. The inclusion criteria were adult patients who had a LeFort I osteotomy in the setting of acute fracture management. Primary outcomes were the long-term stability of fracture fixation and the re-establishment of stable, reproducible occlusion at follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases met the criteria for inclusion. The most common indication was contralateral LeFort I and ipsilateral incomplete or absent LeFort I (50%). Most remaining cases had a high LeFort (II or III) on the ipsilateral side and a high LeFort I on the contralateral side (41%). There was one case of nonunion requiring revision and bone grafting. In all remaining cases who presented for follow-up at an average of 1.5 years, stable, reproducible occlusion was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: In acute trauma, a LeFort I osteotomy is a safe and effective technique to re-establish premorbid occlusion when passive reduction of the maxilla cannot be achieved. This technique can be safely added to the armamentarium of any surgeon who manages acute craniofacial trauma.

Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public.

STUDY DESIGN: A two-alternative forced choice design was used to gather perceptual data regarding unicoronal synostosis (UCS). OBJECTIVE: Cranial vault remodeling aims at improving the aesthetic appearance of infants with UCS by reshaping the forehead and reducing the potential for psychosocial discrimination. People's perception of craniofacial deformity plays a role in the stigma of deformity. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between objective skull deformity in UCS patients and laypersons' perception of skull normality. METHODS: Forty layperson skull raters were recruited from the general public. Skull raters were asked to categorize 45 infant skull images as normal or abnormal. Twenty-one of the images were UCS skulls, and 24 were normal skulls. Skulls were displayed briefly on a computer to simulate a first impression scenario and generate a perceptual response. A χ 2 analysis and mixed-effects regression model were used to analyze the response data. RESULTS: Members of the general public were good at distinguishing between skull groups, χ 2 (1) = 281.97, P < .001. In addition, skull raters' responses were predicted by the severity of deformity in the UCS skulls (b = -0.10, z = -2.6, P = .010, CI: -0.18, -0.02). A skull with a deformity value of 2.8 mm (CI: 1.8, 4.1) was equally likely to be rated normal or abnormal. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate the relationship between objective skull deformity in UCS and public perception. Laypersons were good at distinguishing the difference between normal and UCS skulls, and their perceptions of normality were predicted by the degree of skull deformity.

Test-retest validation of a cranial deformity index in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis.

Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) affects many infants resulting in abnormalities affecting the forehead and orbits. As a result, the deformity caused by UCS is very noticeable and there are several surgical treatment options available to normalize the head shape. However, there is a lack of consistently used outcome measures, resulting in difficulty assessing surgical outcomes and on-going debate over optimal treatments. Current techniques to quantify deformity in UCS are cumbersome, provide limited information, or are based on subjective assessments. In this study, a cranial deformity index was developed to quantify abnormality at the frontal bones for UCS that is accessible, user-friendly, and generates objective surface distance measurements. The cranial deformity index is defined as the Euclidean distance at the point of the largest deviation between the deformed skull compared to a reference skull. In addition, the index was successfully used to quantify post-operative changes in a single case of UCS that underwent corrective surgery. The reproducibility of the index was assessed using test-retest reliability and was demonstrated to be highly reproducible (ICC = 0.93). A user-friendly measurement index that is based on open-source software may be a valuable tool for surgical teams. In addition, this information can augment the consultation experience for patients and their families.

Beare-Stevenson Syndrome With Blepharoptosis as a Complication of Front-Orbital Advancement and Remodeling.

Beare-Stevenson syndrome (BSS) is an extremely rare genetic disorder characterized by a broad range of congenital malformations including craniosynostosis, cutis gyrata, facial deformities, and abnormal genitalia. The authors report a case of a 7 month old female who developed a mechanical ptosis secondary to dermatochalasis as a complication of fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) surgery which subsequently required multiple lid surgeries to reverse ptosis. This is the first report of blepharoptosis correction in a child with BSS as a complication of FOAR.